Skip to main content
Log in

The COST of explicit memory

  • Published:
Phenomenology and the Cognitive Sciences Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Within Piaget there is an implicit theory of the development of explicit memory. It rests in the dynamical trajectory underlying the development of causality, object, space and time – a complex (COST) supporting a symbolic relationship integral to the explicit. Cassirer noted the same dependency in the phenomena of aphasias, insisting that a symbolic function is being undermined in these deficits. This is particularly critical given the reassessment of Piaget’s stages as the natural bifurcations of a self-organizing dynamic system. The elements of a theoretical framework required to support explicit memory are developed, to include, (1) the complex developmental trajectory supporting the emergence of the explicit in Piaget, (2) the concrete dynamical system and the concept of a non-differentiable time contained in Bergson’s theory required to support a conscious, as opposed to an implicit remembrance, (3) the relation to current theories of amnesia, difficulties posed by certain retrograde amnesic phenomena, the role of the hippocampus and limitations of connectionist models, (4) the fact that nowhere in this overall framework does the loss of explicit memory imply or require the destruction of experience “stored in the brain.”

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Alvarez, P., & Squire, L. R. (1994). Memory consolidation and the medial temporal lobe: A simple network model. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 91, 7041–7045.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Barsalou, L. W. (1993). Flexibility, structure and linguistic vagary in concepts: Manifestations of a compositional system of perceptual symbols. In A. Collins, S. Gathercole, M. Conway, & P. Morris (Eds.) Theories of memory. New Jersey: Erlbaum.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bergson, H. (1896/1912). Matter and memory. New York: Macmillan.

    Google Scholar 

  • Block, N. (1995). On a confusion about the function of consciousness. Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 18, 227–247.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bower, G. (1996). Reactivating a reactivation theory of implicit memory. Consciousness and Cognition, 5, 22–72.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Brainerd, C. J. (1978). The stage acquisition in cognitive developmental theory. Behavioral Brain Sciences, 2, 173–213.

    Google Scholar 

  • Brown, A. S. (2002). Consolidation theory and retrograde amnesia in humans. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 9, 403–425.

    Google Scholar 

  • Burgess, N., Becker, S., King, J. A., & O’Keefe, J. (2001). Memory for events and their spatial context: model and experiments. In A. Baddeley, M. Conway, & J. Aggleton (Eds.) Episodic memory: New directions in research. New York: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cabe, P. A., & Pittenger, J. B. (2000). Human sensitivity to acoustic information from vessel filling. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 26, 313–324.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cassirer, E. (1929/1957). The philosophy of symbolic forms, vol. 3: The phenomenology of knowledge. New Haven: Yale University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cassirer, E. (1944). Group concept and perception theory. Philosophy and Phenomenological Research, 5, 1–36.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chrisley, R., & Parthmore, J. (2007). Synthetic phenomenology: Exploiting embodiment to specify the non-conceptual content of visual experience. Journal of Consciousness Studies, 14, 44–58.

    Google Scholar 

  • Copeland, B. J. (2000). Narrow versus wide mechanism: including a re-examination of Turing’s views on the mind-machine issue. Journal of Philosophy, 96(1), 5–32.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dienes, Z., & Perner, J. (1999). A theory of implicit and explicit knowledge. Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 22(5), 735–808.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Domini, F., Vuong, Q. C., & Caudek, C. (2002). Temporal integration in structure from motion. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 28(4), 816–838.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Eichenbaum, H., Otto, T., & Cohen, N. (1994). Two functional components of the hippocampal memory system. Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 17, 449–518.

    Google Scholar 

  • Feynman, R. P., & Hibbs, A. R. (1965). Quantum mechanics and path integrals. New York: MacGraw-Hill.

    Google Scholar 

  • French, R. M. (1999). When coffee cups are like old elephants, or why representation modules don’t make sense. In A. Riegler, M. Peshl, & A. von Stein (Eds.) Understanding representation in the cognitive sciences. New York: Plenum.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fuster, J. M. (1980). The prefrontal cortex: Anatomy, physiology, and neuropsychology of the frontal lobe. New York: Raven.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fuster, J. M. (1985). The prefrontal cortex and temporal integration. In A. Peters, & E. G. Jones (Eds.) Cerebral cortex, 4: Association and auditory cortices (pp. 151–177). New York: Plenum.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fuster, J. M. (1994). In search of the engrammer. Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 17, 476.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gallese, V. (2007). The “conscious” dorsal stream: embodied simulation and its role in space and action conscious awareness. Psyche, 13(1), 1–20.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gelb, K., & Goldstein, K. (1918). Zur psychologie des optischen wahrnehmungs- und erkennungsvorgangs. Zeitschrift fur die gesamte Neurologie und Psychiatrie, 41, 1–142.

  • Gibson, J. J. (1950). The Perception of the Visual World. Boston: Houghton-Mifflin.

  • Gopnik, A. (1996). The post-Piaget era. Psychological Science, 7(4), 221–225.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Graf, P., & Schacter, D. L. (1985). Implicit and explicit memory for new associations in normal subjects and amnesic patients. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 11, 501–518.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gray, J. A. (1995). The contents of consciousness: A neuropsychological conjecture. Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 18, 659–722.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Grossberg, S. (1995). Neural dynamics of motion perception, recognition learning and spatial attention. In R. Port, & T. Van Gelder (Eds.) Mind as motion. Cambridge: MIT.

    Google Scholar 

  • Head, H. (1926). Aphasia and kindred disorders of speech (Vols. I and II). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Howe, M. (2001). The fate of early memories. Washington, DC: The American Psychological Association.

    Google Scholar 

  • Howe, M., & Courage, M. (1993). The emergence and early development of autobiographical memory. Psychological Review, 104(3), 499–523.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kesner, R. P. (1994). Hippocampus and memory for time. Response to Eichenbaum et al., p. 485. Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 17, 449–518.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kihlstrom, J., Dorfman, J., & Park, L. (2007). Implicit and explicit learning and memory. In M. Velmans, & S. Schneider (Eds.). A Companion to consciousness (pp. 539–535). Oxford: Blackwell.

  • Kim, N., Turvey, M., & Carrelo, C. (1993). Optimal information about the severity of upcoming contacts. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 19(1), 179–193.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kiverstein, J. (2007). Could a robot have a subjective point of view? Journal of Consciousness Studies, 14, 127–140.

    Google Scholar 

  • Klein, D. B. (1970). A history of scientific psychology. New York: Basic Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Knowlton, B. J., Ramus, S. J., & Squire, L. R. (1992). Intact artificial grammar learning in amnesias: Dissociation of abstract knowledge and memory for specific instances. Psychological Science, 3, 172–179.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kopelman, M. D., & Kapur, N. (2001). The loss of episodic memories in retrograde amnesia: single case and group studies. In A. Baddeley, M. Conway, & J. Aggleton (Eds.) Episodic memory (pp. 110–131). New York: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kubie, J. L., Sutherland, R. J., & Muller, R. U. (1999). Hippocampal lesions produce a temporally graded retrograde amnesia on a dry version of the Morris swimming task. Psychology, 27, 313–330.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kugler, P., & Turvey, M. (1987). Information, natural law, and the self-assembly of rhythmic movement. Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.

    Google Scholar 

  • Light, L., & Kennison, R. (1996). Guessing strategies in perceptual identification: Reply to Mckoon and Ratliff. Consciousness and Cognition, 5, 512–524.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lourenco, O., & Machado, A. (1996). In defense of Piaget’s theory: A reply to 10 common criticisms. Psychological Review, 103(1), 144–164.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Markovitch, S., & Zelazo, P. (1999). The A-not-B error: Results from a logistic meta-analysis. Child Development, 70, 1297–1313.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Marr, D. (1971). Simple memory: a theory of the archicortex. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society of London, B262, 23–81.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mayes, A. R., & Roberts, N. (2001). Theories of episodic memory. In A. Baddeley, M. Conway, & J. Aggleton (Eds.) Episodic memory (pp. 86–109). New York: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • McClelland, J. L., McNaughton, B. L., & O’Reilly, R. C. (1995). Why there are complementary learning systems in the hippocampus and neocortex: Insights from the successes and failures of connectionist models of learning and memory. Psychological Review, 103(3), 419–457.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • McKoon, G., & Ratliff, R. (1996). Separating implicit from explicit retrieval processes in perceptual identificagtion. Consciousness and Cognition, 5, 500–511.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Molenaar, P., & Raijakers, M. (2000). A causal interpretation of Piaget’s theory of cognitive development: Reflections on the relationship between epigenesis and non-linear dynamics. New Ideas in Psychology, 18, 41–55.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Munakata, Y. (1998). Infant preserverative and implications for object permanence theories: A PDP model of the A-not-B task. Developmental Science, 1, 161–184.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Murre, J. M., Graham, K. S., & Hodges, J. R. (2001). Semantic dementia: relevance to connectionist models of long-term memory. Brain, 124, 647–675.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Nadel, L., & Bohbot, V. (2001). Consolidation of Memory. Hippocampus, 11, 56–59.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Nadel, L., & Moscovitch, N. (1997). Memory consolidation retrograde amnesia and the hippocampal complex. Current Opinions in Neurobiology, 7, 217–227.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nadel, L., Samsonovich, A., Ryan, L., & Moscovitch, V. (2000). Multiple trace theory of human memory: computational, neuroimaging, and neuropsychological results. Hippocampus, 10, 352–368.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Nottale, L. (1996). Scale relativity and fractal space-time: applications to quantum physics, cosmology and chaotic systems. Chaos, Solitons and Fractals, 7, 877–938.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • O’Reilly, R., & Rudy, J. (2001). Conjunctive representations in learning and memory: principles of cortical and hippocampal function. Psychological Review, 108(2), 311–345.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Piaget, J. (1927/1969). The child’s conception of time. New York: Basic Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Piaget, J. (1946). The child’s conception of movement and speed. New York: Ballentine.

    Google Scholar 

  • Piaget, J. (1952). The origins of intelligence in children. New York: International universities press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Piaget, J. (1954). The construction of reality in the child. New York: Ballentine.

    Google Scholar 

  • Piaget, J. (1968). On the development of memory and identity. Massachusetts: Clark University Press.

  • Pylyshyn, Z. (2002). Mental imagery: In search of a theory. Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 25, 157–238.

    Google Scholar 

  • Raijmakers, M. E. J., van Der Maas, H. L. J., & Molenaar, P. C. M. (1996). On the validity of simulating stagewise development by means of PDP networks: Application of catastrophe analysis and an experimental test of rule-like network performance. Cognitive Science, 20, 101–136.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rakison, D. (2007). Is consciousness in its infancy in infancy? Journal of Consciousness Studies, 14, 66–89.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ribot, H. (1881) Les maladies de la memoire. Paris.

  • Robbins, S. E. (2000). Bergson, perception and Gibson. Journal of Consciousness Studies, 7(5), 23–45.

    Google Scholar 

  • Robbins, S. E. (2002). Semantics, experience and time. Cognitive Systems Research, 3, 301–335.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Robbins, S. E. (2004a). On time, memory and dynamic form. Consciousness and Cognition, 13, 762–788.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Robbins, S. E. (2004b). Virtual action: O’Regan and Noë meet Bergson. Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 24(7), 906–907.

    Google Scholar 

  • Robbins, S. E. (2006a). On the possibility of direct memory. In V. W. Fallio (Ed.) New Developments in Consciousness Research (pp. 1–64). New York: Nova Science.

    Google Scholar 

  • Robbins, S. E. (2006b). Bergson and the holographic theory of mind. Phenomenology and the Cognitive Sciences, 5, 365–394.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Robbins, S. E. (2007). Time, form and the limits of qualia. Journal of Mind and Behavior, 28(1), 19–43.

    Google Scholar 

  • Robbins, S. E. (2008). Semantic redintegration: Ecological invariance. (Commentary on T. Rogers and J. McClelland, Precis of Semantic Cognition: A Parallel Distributed Processing Approach). Behavioral and Brain Sciences (in press).

  • Rosenbaum, R. S., Priselac, S., Kohler, S., Black, S. E., Nadel, L., & Moscovitch, M. (2000). Studies of remote spatial memory in an amnesic patient with extensive bilateral hippocampal lesions. Nature Neuroscience, 3, 1044–1048.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rovee-Collier, C., Hayne, H., & Colombo, M. (2000). The development of implicit and explicit memory. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schacter, D. L. (1987). Implicit memory: history and current status. Journal of Experimental Psycholgoy: Learning, Memory and Cognition, 13, 501–518.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Scoville, W. B., & Milner, B. (1957). Loss of recent memory after bi-lateral hippocampal lesions. Journal of Neurology, Neurosurgery and Psychiatry, 20, 11–21.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Searle, J. R. (2000). Consciousness, free action and the brain. Journal of Consciousness Studies, 7, 3–22.

    Google Scholar 

  • Shallice, T., Fletcher, P., Frith, C. D., Grasby, P. M., Frackowiak, R. S., & Dolan, R. J. (1994). Brain regions associated with acquisition and retrieval of verbal episodic memory. Nature, 368, 633–635.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Squire, L. R. (1987). Memory and brain. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Squire, L. R., Clark, R. E., & Knowlton, B. J. (2000). Retrograde Amnesia. Hippocampus, 11, 61–78.

    Google Scholar 

  • Squire, L. R., & Knowlton, B. (1995). Leaning about categories in the absence of memory. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences USA, 92, 12470–12474.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Thelen, E., Schoner, G., Scheler, C., & Smith, L. (2001). The dynamics of embodiment: A field theory of infant perseverative reaching. Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 24, 1–86.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tulving, E. (2001a). Episodic memory and common sense: how far apart. In A. Baddeley, M. Conway, & J. Aggleton (Eds.) Episodic memory: New directions in research (pp. 269–288). New York: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tulving, E. (2001b). The origin of autonoesis in episodic memory. In H. L. Roediger III, J. Nairne, I. Neath, & A. Surprenant (Eds.) The nature of remembering: Essays in Honor Robert G. Crowder. Washington, DC: American Psyhcological Association.

    Google Scholar 

  • Turvey, M., & Carello, C. (1995). Dynamic touch. In W. Epstein, & S. Rogers (Eds.) Perception of space and motion. San Diego: Academic.

    Google Scholar 

  • Van deer Maas, H. L. J., & Molenaar, P. C. M. (1992). Stagewise cognitive development: an application of catastrophe theory. Psychological Review, 99, 395–417.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Van der Linden, M., & Coyette, F. (1995). Acquisition of word processing knowledge in an amnesic patient: implications for theory and rehabilitation. In R. Campbell, & M. M. A. Conway (Eds.) Broken memories. Oxford, UK: Blackwell.

    Google Scholar 

  • Viskontas, I. V., McAndrews, M. P., & Moskovitch, M. (2000). Remote episodic memory deficits in patients with unilateral temporal lobe epilepsy and excisions. Journal of Neuroscience, 20(15), 5853–5857.

    Google Scholar 

  • Warrington, E. K., & Sanders, H. I. (1971). The fate of old memories. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 23, 432–442.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Warrington, E. K., & Weiskrantz, L. (1973). An analysis of short-term and long-term memory defects in man. In J. A. Deutsch (Ed.) The physiological basis of memory. New York: Academic.

    Google Scholar 

  • Warrington, E. K., & Weiskrantz, L. (1982). Amnesia: A disconnexion syndrome? Neuropsychogica, 20, 233–248.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Weiskrantz, L. (1997). Consciousness lost and found. New York: Oxford.

    Google Scholar 

  • Winocur, G., & Weiskrantz, L. (1976). An investigation of paired-associate learning in amnesiac patients. Neuropsychologia, 14, 97–110.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wood, F., Ebert, V., & Kinsbourne, M. (1982). The episodic-semantic memory distinction in memory and amnesia: Clinical and experimental observations. In L. Cermak (Ed.) Human memory and amnesia. Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.

    Google Scholar 

  • Yasue, K., Jibu, M., & Pribram, K. H. (1991). A theory of non-local cortical processing in the brain. In K. H. Pribram (Ed.)Brain and perception. New Jersey: Erlbaum.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgement

I would like to thank the anonymous reviewers for their valuable suggestions and the dedication of their invaluable time.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Stephen E. Robbins.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Robbins, S.E. The COST of explicit memory. Phenom Cogn Sci 8, 33–66 (2009). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11097-008-9088-0

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11097-008-9088-0

Keywords

Navigation