Skip to main content
Log in

The “Ethical” Professor and the Undergraduate Student: Current Perceptions of Moral Behavior among Business School Faculty

  • Published:
Journal of Academic Ethics Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

A survey of 830 faculty members at 89 AASCB-accredited business schools throughout the United States was conducted in Fall 2002 to develop a snapshot of perceptions of ethical and unethical conduct with regard to undergraduate business instruction across a wide range of business disciplines. These behaviors fell into such categories as course content, evaluation of students, educational environment, disrespectful behavior, research and publication issues, financial and material transactions, social relationships with students, and sexual relationships with students and other faculty. Of the 55 behaviors, two were almost universally perceived to be unethical. Eight behaviors were controversial in that there was wide variance on whether the behavior was perceived to be unethical. In addition, females' ethical perceptions differed significantly from males on three behaviors; older participants differed from younger participants on seven behaviors; participants at research-oriented institutions differed from participants at teaching-oriented institutions on one behavior; and tenured, untenured tenure-track, and untenured non-tenure-track participants differed on three behaviors. The findings of this study and the detailed comments of the respondents provide a starting point for discussing more systematic means to consider ethical issues within collegiate schools of business.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

REFERENCES

  • Academy of Management (2002). Academy of Management Code of Ethical Conduct, Academy of Management Journal 45, 291–294.

    Google Scholar 

  • American Association of University Professors (AAUP) (1987). Statement on professional ethics, Academe 73.

  • Birch, M., Elliott, D. & Trankel, M.A. (1999). Black and white and shades of gray: A portrait of the ethi0cal professor, Ethics & Behavior 9, 243–261.

    Google Scholar 

  • Braxton, J. (Ed.). (1994). Special issue: Perspectives on research misconduct, Journal of Higher Education 65.

  • Dill, D. (Ed.). (1982). Special issue: Ethics and the academic profession, Journal of Higher Education 53.

  • Engle, T.J. & Smith, J.L. (1990). The ethical standards of accounting academics, Issues in Accounting Education 5, 7–29.

    Google Scholar 

  • Holtschneider, D.H. (2001). Academic ethics: A state of the field. In J. Dienhart, D. Moberg & R. Duska (Eds), The Next Phase of Business Ethics: Integrating Psychology and Ethics (pp. 483–493), Oxford, UK: JAI Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lewellyn, P.A.G. (1996). Academic perceptions: Ethics in the information systems discipline. Journal of Business Ethics 15, 559–569.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mason, J.B., Bearden, W.O. & Richardson, L.D. (1990). Perceived conduct and professional ethics among marketing faculty, Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science 18, 185–197.

    Google Scholar 

  • Robie, C., Kidwell, R.E., Jr. & Kling, J. (2002, October). The ethics of professorial book selling. Paper presented at Ninth Annual International Conference Promoting Business Ethics, Niagara Falls, NY.

  • Tabachnick, B.G., Keith-Spiegel, P. & Pope, K.S. (1991). Ethics of teaching: Beliefs and behaviors of psychologists as educators, American Psychologist 46, 506–515.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Robie, C., Kidwell, R.E. The “Ethical” Professor and the Undergraduate Student: Current Perceptions of Moral Behavior among Business School Faculty. Journal of Academic Ethics 1, 153–173 (2003). https://doi.org/10.1023/B:JAET.0000006893.06303.41

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1023/B:JAET.0000006893.06303.41

Navigation