Skip to main content
Log in

Coping with ambiguity and uncertainty in patient-physician relationships: I. Leadership of a physician

  • Published:
Journal of Medical Humanities Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

A patient-physician relationship provides a milieu for a patient to achieve healing, solace, and reintegration of personhood. A patient's primary physician assumes a leadership role in that regard, coordinating and facilitating a regimen of analysis and therapy. The quality, quantity, and rapidity of technological advancements in the delivery of medical care, render any individual physician incomplete in terms of his ability to provide total care. Consequently, a succession of professional and paraprofessional personnel must be involved to maximize the care rendered. Nevertheless, a patient's primary physician must fulfill a leadership role as he coordinates consultations and interprets the data they provide, placing it in the appropriate situational context for his patient as part of a collective and mutual decision-making process. A patient's primary physician must be acknowledged to possess the power and authority to effect the care provided, as he must also accept the accountability, duty, obligation, and responsibility for the result of that care. By these means ambiguity and uncertainty are mitigated.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Davila, F.: Clinical Ethics. The Physician Decides Who Decides (Abstract).Demands, Dilemmas, Decisions: Ethics in the Clinical Setting. Society for Health and Human Values Spring Meeting, Medical College of Ohio, Toledo, Ohio, May 6–8, 1987.

  2. Gerth, H. H., Mills, C. W.:From Max Weber: Essays in Sociology. University Press, Oxford, 1946.

    Google Scholar 

  3. Weber, M.:Theory of Social and Economic Organization. (Henderson, A. M., Parsons, T.: translator and editor), University Press, Oxford, 1947.

    Google Scholar 

  4. Sennett, R.:Authority. Vintage Books, Random House, New York, 1980.

    Google Scholar 

  5. Morrow, L.: “TheGravitas Factor.”Time: p. 94, March 14, 1988.

  6. Szasz, T. S., Hollender, M.: The basic models of the doctor-patient relationship.Arch. Int. Med. 97:585–592, 1956.

    Google Scholar 

  7. Lain-Entralgo, P.:Doctor and Patient. World University Library, London, 1969.

    Google Scholar 

  8. Childress, J. F., Siegler, M.: Metaphors and models of doctor-patient relationships: Their implications for autonomy.Theor. Med. 5:17–30, 1984.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Siegler, M.: A right to heath care: Ambiguity, professional responsibility, and patient liberty.J. Med. Phil. 4:148–157, 1979.

    Google Scholar 

  10. Siegler, M.: Searching for moral certainty in medicine: A proposal for a new model of the doctor-patient encounter.Bull. N. Y. Acad. Med. 57:56–59, 1981.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Siegler, M.: The physician-patient accommodation: A central event in clinical medicine.Arch. Int. Med. 142: 1899–1902, 1982.

    Google Scholar 

  12. Siegler, M.: The progression of medicine. From physician paternalism to patient autonomy to bureaucratic parsimony.Arch. Int. Med. 145:713–715, 1985.

    Google Scholar 

  13. Thomasma, D. C.: The basis of medicine and religion: Respect for persons.Hosp. Prog. 60:54–57, 90, 1979.

    Google Scholar 

  14. Thomasma, D. C.: Beyond medical paternalism and patient autonomy: A model of physician conscience for the physician-patient relationship.Ann. Int. Med. 98: 243–248, 1983.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Thomasma, D. C.: Limitations of the autonomy model for the doctor-patient relationship.Pharos 46:2–5, 1983.

    Google Scholar 

  16. Thomasma, D. C.: Autonomy in the doctor-patient relationship.Theor. Med. 5:1–7, 1984.

    Google Scholar 

  17. Veatch, R. M.: Models for ethical medicine in a revolutionary age.Hastings Cen. Rep. 2:5–7, 1972.

    Google Scholar 

  18. Veatch, R. M.: Professional medical ethics: The grounding of its principles.J. Med. Phil. 4:1–19, 1979.

    Google Scholar 

  19. Veatch, R. M.: Professional ethics: New priorities for physicians?Hastings Cen. Rep. 10:16–19, 1980.

    Google Scholar 

  20. Kitto, H.O.F.:Greek Tragedy. Third Edition. Barnes & Noble, New York, 1961.

    Google Scholar 

  21. Hunter, K. M.: Limiting treatment in a social vacuum: A Greek chorus for William T.Arch. Int. Med. 145:716–719, 1985.

    Google Scholar 

  22. Rodning, C. B.: Disaster Preparedness.South Med. J. 76:229–231, 1983.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  23. Singer, I. B.:In My Father's Court. Fawcett Crest, New York, 1962.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Rodning, C.B. Coping with ambiguity and uncertainty in patient-physician relationships: I. Leadership of a physician. J Med Hum 13, 91–101 (1992). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01149651

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01149651

Keywords

Navigation