Abstract
A patient-physician relationship provides a milieu for a patient to achieve healing, solace, and reintegration of personhood. A patient's primary physician assumes a leadership role in that regard, coordinating and facilitating a regimen of analysis and therapy. The quality, quantity, and rapidity of technological advancements in the delivery of medical care, render any individual physician incomplete in terms of his ability to provide total care. Consequently, a succession of professional and paraprofessional personnel must be involved to maximize the care rendered. Nevertheless, a patient's primary physician must fulfill a leadership role as he coordinates consultations and interprets the data they provide, placing it in the appropriate situational context for his patient as part of a collective and mutual decision-making process. A patient's primary physician must be acknowledged to possess the power and authority to effect the care provided, as he must also accept the accountability, duty, obligation, and responsibility for the result of that care. By these means ambiguity and uncertainty are mitigated.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Davila, F.: Clinical Ethics. The Physician Decides Who Decides (Abstract).Demands, Dilemmas, Decisions: Ethics in the Clinical Setting. Society for Health and Human Values Spring Meeting, Medical College of Ohio, Toledo, Ohio, May 6–8, 1987.
Gerth, H. H., Mills, C. W.:From Max Weber: Essays in Sociology. University Press, Oxford, 1946.
Weber, M.:Theory of Social and Economic Organization. (Henderson, A. M., Parsons, T.: translator and editor), University Press, Oxford, 1947.
Sennett, R.:Authority. Vintage Books, Random House, New York, 1980.
Morrow, L.: “TheGravitas Factor.”Time: p. 94, March 14, 1988.
Szasz, T. S., Hollender, M.: The basic models of the doctor-patient relationship.Arch. Int. Med. 97:585–592, 1956.
Lain-Entralgo, P.:Doctor and Patient. World University Library, London, 1969.
Childress, J. F., Siegler, M.: Metaphors and models of doctor-patient relationships: Their implications for autonomy.Theor. Med. 5:17–30, 1984.
Siegler, M.: A right to heath care: Ambiguity, professional responsibility, and patient liberty.J. Med. Phil. 4:148–157, 1979.
Siegler, M.: Searching for moral certainty in medicine: A proposal for a new model of the doctor-patient encounter.Bull. N. Y. Acad. Med. 57:56–59, 1981.
Siegler, M.: The physician-patient accommodation: A central event in clinical medicine.Arch. Int. Med. 142: 1899–1902, 1982.
Siegler, M.: The progression of medicine. From physician paternalism to patient autonomy to bureaucratic parsimony.Arch. Int. Med. 145:713–715, 1985.
Thomasma, D. C.: The basis of medicine and religion: Respect for persons.Hosp. Prog. 60:54–57, 90, 1979.
Thomasma, D. C.: Beyond medical paternalism and patient autonomy: A model of physician conscience for the physician-patient relationship.Ann. Int. Med. 98: 243–248, 1983.
Thomasma, D. C.: Limitations of the autonomy model for the doctor-patient relationship.Pharos 46:2–5, 1983.
Thomasma, D. C.: Autonomy in the doctor-patient relationship.Theor. Med. 5:1–7, 1984.
Veatch, R. M.: Models for ethical medicine in a revolutionary age.Hastings Cen. Rep. 2:5–7, 1972.
Veatch, R. M.: Professional medical ethics: The grounding of its principles.J. Med. Phil. 4:1–19, 1979.
Veatch, R. M.: Professional ethics: New priorities for physicians?Hastings Cen. Rep. 10:16–19, 1980.
Kitto, H.O.F.:Greek Tragedy. Third Edition. Barnes & Noble, New York, 1961.
Hunter, K. M.: Limiting treatment in a social vacuum: A Greek chorus for William T.Arch. Int. Med. 145:716–719, 1985.
Rodning, C. B.: Disaster Preparedness.South Med. J. 76:229–231, 1983.
Singer, I. B.:In My Father's Court. Fawcett Crest, New York, 1962.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Rodning, C.B. Coping with ambiguity and uncertainty in patient-physician relationships: I. Leadership of a physician. J Med Hum 13, 91–101 (1992). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01149651
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01149651