Skip to main content
Log in

The Employment At-Will Doctrine: Second Level Ethical Issues and Analysis

  • Published:
Journal of Business Ethics Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

There is an ongoing debate over the ethical status of policies that give an employer the right to discharge an employee without a good reason or notice (i.e., employment at-will policies). This article moves beyond the question of whether the adoption of such a policy is unethical per se under all circumstances, focusing instead on the following question: Assuming that an at-will policy is not unethical per se in all circumstances, what are the ethical issues associated with an employer's implementation and maintenance of an employment at-will policy, and how can these issues be addressed? Three primary ethical concerns are identified and discussed, and specific propositions regarding employers' obligations are presented. The article concludes by offering practical guidance intended to assist at-will employers in meeting the identified ethical obligations.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Americans With Disabilities Act, 42 U.S.C. Section 12101 et. seq.

  • Berger, M.: 1967, 'Unjust Dismissal and the Contingent Worker: Restructuring Doctrine for Restructured Employees', Yale Law and Policy Review 16, 1-57.

    Google Scholar 

  • Blades, L. E.: 1967, 'Employment At-Will vs. Individual Freedom: On Limiting the Abusive Exercise of Employer Power', Columbia Law Review 67, 104-163.

    Google Scholar 

  • Callahan, E. S.: 1990, 'Employment At Will: The Relationship between Societal Expectations and the Law', American Business Law Journal 28, 455-484.

    Google Scholar 

  • Civil Rights Act of 1991, Pub. L. No. 102-166, 105 Stat. 1071 (codified in different sections of 42 U.S.C., 29 U.S.C., and 2 U.S.C.).

  • Des Jardins, J.: 1995, 'Fairness and the Employment At-Will Doctrine', Journal of Social Philosophy 16, 31-38.

    Google Scholar 

  • Eastman, W.: 1997, 'Overestimating Oneself and Overlooking the Law: Psychological Supports for Employment At Will', Employee Responsibilities and Rights Journal 10, 21-35.

    Google Scholar 

  • Epstein, R. A.: 1984, 'In Defense of Contract At Will', University of Chicago Law Review 51, 947-982.

    Google Scholar 

  • Estlund, C. L.: 1996, 'Wrongful Discharge Protection in an At-Will World', Texas Law Review 74, 1655-1692.

    Google Scholar 

  • Estlund, C. L.: 2002, 'How Wrong are Employees about Their Rights, and Why Does it Matter?', New York University Law Review 77, 6-35.

    Google Scholar 

  • Festinger, L.: 1957, A Theory of Cognitive Dissonance (Row, Peterson, Evanston, IL).

    Google Scholar 

  • Forbes, F. S. and I. M. Jones: 1986, 'A Comparative, Attitudinal, and Analytical Study of the Dismissal of At-Will Employees without Cause', Labor Law Journal, 157-166.

  • Gatewood, R. D. and A. B. Carroll: 1991, 'Assessment of the Ethical Performance of Organizational Members', Academy of Management Review 16(4), 667-691.

    Google Scholar 

  • Haung, W. and S. E. Rubin: 1997, 'Equal Access to Employment Opportunities for People with Mental Retardation: An Obligation of Society', Journal of Rehabilitation 63, 27-33.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hiley, D.: 1985, 'Employee Rights and the Doctrine of At-Will Employment', Business and Professonal Ethics Journal.

  • Hilgert, R. L.: 1991, 'Employers Protected by At-Will Statements', HRMagazine (March), 57-60.

  • Hunter-Harvill v. Schools of the 21st Century: 2002, 2002 Mich. App. Lexis 217.

  • Kim, P. T.: 1997, 'Bargaining with Imperfect Information: A Study of Worker Perceptions of legal Protection in an At-Will World', Cornell Law Review 89, 105-155.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kim, P. T.: 1999, 'Norms, Learning, and Law: Exploring the Influences of Workers' Knowledge', University of Illinois Law Review, 447-515.

  • Lindeman, B. and P. Grossman: 1997, Employment Discrimination Law (3rd ed.). The Bureau of National Affairs, Inc., Washington, D.C.).

    Google Scholar 

  • McGowan, K. C.: 1998, 'Unequal Opportunity in At-Will Employment: The Search for a Remedy', St. John's Law Review 72, 141-183.

    Google Scholar 

  • Million, D.: 1998, 'Default Rules, Wealth Distribution, and Corporate Law Reform: Employment At-Will versus Job Security', University of Pennsylvania Law Review 146, 975-1041.

    Google Scholar 

  • Minnow, M.: 1990, Making All The Difference: Inclusion, Exclusion, and American Law (Cornell University Press, Ithaca, NY).

    Google Scholar 

  • Munson, G. M.: 1997, 'A Straitjacket for Employment At-Will: Recognizing Breach of Implied Contract Actions for Wrongful Demotion', Vanderbilt Law Review 50(6), 1578-1617.

    Google Scholar 

  • Phillips, M. J.: 1994, 'Should We Let Employees Contract Away Their Rights against Arbitrary Discharge?', Journal of Business Ethics 4, 233-244.

    Google Scholar 

  • Roehling, M. V. and D. Winters: 2000, 'Job Security Rights: The Effects of Specific Policies and Practices on the Evaluation of Employers', Employee Responsibilities and Rights Journal 12, 25-38.

    Google Scholar 

  • Roehling, M. V.: 2002, 'The “Good Cause” Norm in Employment Relations: Empirical Evidence and Policy Implications', Employee Responsibilities and Rights Journal 14, 91-104.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rowan, J. R.: 2000, 'The Moral Foundation of Employee Rights', Journal of Business Ethics 24(4), 355-361.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rousseau: 2001, 'Schema, promise, and Mutuality: Building Blocks of the Psychological Contract', Journal of Occupational and Organizational Psychology 74(4), 511-541.

    Google Scholar 

  • Runge v. Raytheon E-Systems (2001), 57 S.W.3rd, 562.

  • Schmedeman, D. A. and J. McLean Parks: 1994, 'Contract Formation and Employee Handbooks: Legal, Psychological, and Empirical Analyses', Wake Forest Law Review 29, 647-718.

    Google Scholar 

  • Stolle, D. P. and S. J. Slain: 1997, 'Standard Form Contracts and Contract Schema: A Preliminary Investigation of the Effects of Exculpatory Clauses on Consumer's Propensity to Sue', Behavioral Sciences and the Law 15, 83-94.

    Google Scholar 

  • Summers, C. W.: 1976, 'Individual Protection against Unjust Dismissal: Time for a Statute', Virginia Law Review 62, 481-530.

    Google Scholar 

  • Summers, C. W.: 2000, 'Employment At-Will in the United States: The Divine Right of Employers', University of Pennsylvania Journal of Labor and Employment Law 3, 65-85.

    Google Scholar 

  • Toussaint v. Blue Cross & Blue Shield of Michigan: 1980, 292 N.W.2d 880 (Mich. 1980).

  • Verkerke. J. H.: 1995, 'An Empirical Perspective on Indefinite Term Contracts: Resolving the Just Cause Debate', Wisconsin Law Review 4, 837-918.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wayland, R. F., J. M. Clay and P. L. Payne: 1993, Employment At Will Statements: Perceptions of Job Applicants', International Journal of Manpower 14, 22-33.

    Google Scholar 

  • Werhane, P.: 1985, Persons, Rights, and Corporations (Prentice-Hall, Englewood Cliffs, NJ).

    Google Scholar 

  • Young, D. E.: 2001, 'Racial Releases, Involuntary Separations, and Employment At-Will', Loyola of Los Angeles Law Review 34, 351-438.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Roehling, M.V. The Employment At-Will Doctrine: Second Level Ethical Issues and Analysis. Journal of Business Ethics 47, 115–124 (2003). https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1026038307858

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1026038307858

Keywords

Navigation