Skip to main content
Log in

Achieving knowledge across borders: facilitating practices of triangulation, obliterating “digital junkyards”

  • Published:
Ethics and Information Technology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

International companies expanding and competing in an increasingly global context are currently discovering the necessity of sharing knowledge across geographical and disciplinary borders. Yet, especially in such contexts, sharing knowledge is inherently complex and problematic in practice. Inspired by recent contributions in science studies, this paper argues that knowledge sharing in a global context must take into account the heterogeneous and locally embedded nature of knowledge. In this perspective, knowledge cannot easily be received through advanced information technologies, but must always be achieved in practice. Empirically, this paper draws from two contrasting initiatives in a major international oil and gas company for improving its current ways of sharing knowledge between geographically distributed sites and disciplines involved in well planning and drilling. The contrasting cases reveal that while a shared database system failed to improve knowledge sharing across contexts, a flexible arrangement supporting collaboration and use of different representation of knowledge was surprisingly successful. Based on these findings the paper underscores and conceptualizes various triangulating practices conducted in order to achieve knowledge across borders. More accurately these practices are central for individuals’ and communities’ abilities to: (i) negotiate ambiguous information, (ii) filter, combine, and integrate various heterogeneous sources of information, and (iii) judge the trustworthiness of information. Concerning the design and use of information technologies this implies that new designs need to facilitate triangulating practices of users rather than just providing advanced platforms (“digital junkyards”) for sharing information.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Alavi M., Leidner D. E. (2001) Review: Knowledge Management and Knowledge Management Systems: Conceptual Foundations and Research Issues. MIS Quarterly 25(1):107–136

    Google Scholar 

  • Alder K. (1998) Making Things the Same: Representation, Tolerance and the End of the Ancien Régime in France. Social Studies of Science 28(4):499–545

    Google Scholar 

  • Alvesson M. (2004) Knowledge Work and Knowledge-intensive Firms. Oxford: Oxford University Press

    Google Scholar 

  • Berg M., Goorman E. (1999) The Contextual Nature of Medical Information. International Journal of Medical Informatics 56:51–60

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bud-Frierman L. (1994) Information Acumen. In L Bud-Frierman, (Eds.) Information Acumen: The Understanding and Use of Knowledge in Modern Business. Routledge, London, pp. 7–25

    Google Scholar 

  • Feldman M. S., March J. G. (1981) Information in Organizations and Signal and Symbol. Administrative Science Quarterly 26:171–186

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Grant R. M. (1996) Toward a Knowledge-based Theory of the Firm. Strategic Management Journal 17:109–122

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hutchins E. (1995) Cognition in the Wild. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press

    Google Scholar 

  • Jirotka M., Procter R., Hartswood M., Slack R., Simpson A., Coopmans C., Hinds C., Voss A. (2005) Collaboration and Trust in Healthcare Innovation: The eDiaMoND Case Study. Computer Supported Cooperative Work 14:369–398

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Klein H. K., Myers M. D. (1999) A Set of Principles Interpretive Field Studies in Information Systems. MIS Quarterly 23(1):67–94

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Knorr-Cetina K. (1999) Epistemic Cultures: How the Sciences Make Knowledge. Harvard University Press, Cambridge, MA

    Google Scholar 

  • Lam A. (1997) Embedded Firms, Embedded Knowledge: Problems of Collaboration and Knowledge Transfer in Global Cooperative Ventures. Organization Studies 18(6):973–996

    Google Scholar 

  • Latour B. (1987) Science in Action. Harvard University Press, Cambridge, MA

    Google Scholar 

  • Lave J., Wenger E. (1991) Situated Learning. Legitimate Peripheral Participation. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge

    Google Scholar 

  • McDermott R. (1999) Why Information Technology Inspired But Cannot Deliver Knowledge Management. California Management Review 41(4):103–117

    MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  • Nonaka I., Takeuchi H. (1998) A Theory of the Firm’s Knowledge-creating Dynamics. In Chandler Jr. A. D., Hagstrøm P., Sølvell ø. (Eds.). The Dynamic Firm. The Role of Technology, Strategy, Organization and Regions. Oxford University Press, Oxford

    Google Scholar 

  • O’Connell J. (1993) Metrology: The Creation of Universality by the Circulation of Particulars. Social Studies of Science 23:129–173

    Google Scholar 

  • Orlikowski W. U. (2002) Knowing in Practice: Enacting a Collective Capability in Distributed Organizing. Organization Science 13(3):249–273

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Orr J. (1996) Talking About Machines: An Ethnography of a Modern Job. ILR Press, Ithaca, NY

    Google Scholar 

  • Polanyi M. (1966) The Tacit Dimension. Doubleday & Company, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • K.H. Rolland, V. Hepsø and E. Monteiro. (Re)conceptualizing Common Information Spaces Across Heterogeneous Contexts: im-/mutable mobiles and imperfection, submitted manuscript (available upon request), 2006

  • Rolland K. H., Monteiro E. (2002) Balancing the Local and the Global in Infrastructural Information Systems. The Information Society 18(2):87–100

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Silverman D. (2001) Interpreting Qualitative Data: Methods for Analysing Talk, Text and Interaction. Sage, London

    Google Scholar 

  • Thompson M. P. A., Walsham G. (2004) Placing Knowledge Management in ContextJournal of Management Studies 41(5):725–747

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Timmermans S., Berg M. (1997) Standardization in Action: Achieving Local Universality through Medical Protocols. Social Studies of Science 27:273–305

    Google Scholar 

  • Tsoukas H. (1996) The Firm as a Distributed Knowledge System: A Constructivist Approach. Strategic Management Journal 17(Winter Special Issue):11–25

    Google Scholar 

  • Tsoukas H. (2005) Complex Knowledge – Studies in Organizational Epistemology. Oxford University Press, Oxford

    Google Scholar 

  • Turnbull D. (1993) The Ad Hoc Collective Work of Building Gothic Cathedrals with Templates, String, and Geometry. Science, Technology & Human Values 18(3):315–340

    Google Scholar 

  • Walsham G. (2001) Making a World of Difference: IT in a Global Context. Wiley, Chichester

    Google Scholar 

  • Zack M. H. (1999) Managing Codified Knowledge. Sloan Management Review 40(4):45–58

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Knut H. Rolland.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Rolland, K.H. Achieving knowledge across borders: facilitating practices of triangulation, obliterating “digital junkyards”. Ethics Inf Technol 8, 143–154 (2006). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10676-006-9120-4

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10676-006-9120-4

Keywords

Navigation