Skip to main content
Log in

Consciousness: The transcendentalist manifesto

  • Published:
Phenomenology and the Cognitive Sciences Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Phenomenal consciousness, what it is like to have or undergo an experience, is typically understood as an empirical item – an actual or possible object of consciousness. Accordingly, the problem posed by phenomenal consciousness for materialist accounts of the mind is usually understood as an empirical problem: a problem of showing how one sort of empirical item – a conscious state – is produced or constituted by another – a neural process. The development of this problem, therefore, has usually consisted in the articulation of an intuition: no matter how much we know about the brain, this will not allow us to see how it produces or constitutes phenomenal consciousness. Developing a theme first explored by Kant, and then later by Sartre, this paper argues that the real problem posed by phenomenal consciousness is quite different. Consciousness, it will be argued, is not an empirical but a transcendental feature of the world. That is, what it is like to have an experience is not something of which we are aware in the having of that experience, but an item in virtue of which the genuine (non-phenomenal) objects of our consciousness are revealed as being the way they are. Phenomenal consciousness, that is, is not an empirical object of awareness but a transcendental condition of the possibility of there being empirical objects of awareness.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Dretske, F. 1993. Conscious experience. Mind 102: 263-283.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jackson, F. 1982. Epiphenomenal Qualia. Philosophical Quarterly 32: 127-132.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jackson, F. 1986. What Mary didn't know. Journal of Philosophy 83: 291-295.

    Google Scholar 

  • Levine, J. 1983. Materialism and qualia: the explanatory gap. Pacific Philosophical Quarterly 64: 354-361.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kant, I. 1929. The Critique of Pure Reason A edition 1781 + B edition 1787, trans Norman Kemp Smith. London: Macmillan Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Martin, M. G. F. The transparency of experience. Unpublished manuscript.

  • McGinn, C. 1991. The Problem of Consciousness. Oxford: Blackwell.

    Google Scholar 

  • Moore, G. E. 1903. The refutation of idealism. Mind 12: 433-453.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rowlands, M. 2001. The Nature of Consciousness. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sartre, J.-P. 1971. The Transcendence of the Ego, trans. F. Williams and R. Kirkpatrick. New York: Noonday Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sartre, J.-P. 1995. Being and Nothingness, trans. H. Barnes. London: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Rowlands, M. Consciousness: The transcendentalist manifesto. Phenomenology and the Cognitive Sciences 2, 205–221 (2003). https://doi.org/10.1023/B:PHEN.0000004925.72401.ce

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1023/B:PHEN.0000004925.72401.ce

Keywords

Navigation