Abstract
We offer an overview of some ways of examining the connections between stance and rationality, by surveying recent work on four central topics: (a) the very idea of a stance, (b) the relations between stances and voluntarism, (c) the metaphysics and epistemology that emerge once stances are brought to center stage, and (d) the role that emotions and phenomenology play in the empirical stance.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Monton, B. (eds) (2007) Images of empiricism. Clarendon Press, Oxford
Rowbottom D.P. (2005) The empirical stance vs. the critical attitude. South African Journal of Philosophy 24(3): 200–223
Rowbottom D.P., Bueno O. (2009) Why advocate pancritical rationalism?. In: Parusniková Z., Cohen R.S. (eds) Rethinking popper, Boston Studies in the Philosophy of Science, Vol. 272. Springer, Dordrecht, pp 81–89
Teller P. (2004) What is a stance?. Philosophical Studies 121(2): 159–170
van Fraassen B.C. (2002) The empirical stance. Yale University Press, New Haven
van Fraassen B.C. (2004) Replies to discussion on the empirical stance. Philosophical Studies 121(2): 171–192
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Rowbottom, D.P., Bueno, O. Stance and rationality: a perspective. Synthese 178, 1–5 (2011). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11229-009-9526-8
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11229-009-9526-8