Skip to main content

Abstract

In this chapter, we present supporting arguments for the claim that Order Ethics is a school of thought within ethics which is especially open to empirical evidence. With its focus on order frameworks, i.e., incentive structures, Order Ethical advice automatically raises questions on implementability, efficacy, and efficiency of such recommended institutions, all of which are empirical questions to a good extent. We illustrate our arguments by presenting a small selection of experiments from economics that we consider highly informative for Order Ethics. These experiments vary in their details but share one common theme: individual decision-making and its aggregate results are tested against the background of incentive structures. In particular, these studies provide first insights on how unregulated markets influence moral behaviour over time, how trial-and-error experiences convince subjects to migrate to more efficient institutions , and how default rules can influence fundamental choices of people. We argue that Order Ethics, for which implementability of any moral claim is an essential requirement, can largely benefit from the use of such experimental methods. Finally, we suggest the provision of self-commitment devices as one example of smart policy design that avoids paternalistic intrusions into individual liberty.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 84.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  • Ashraf, Nava, Dean Karlan, and Wesley Yin. 2006. The Quarterly Journal of Economics 121: 635–672. doi:10.1162/qjec.2006.121.2.635.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ariely, Dan, and Klaus Wertenbroch. 2002. Procrastination, deadlines, and performance: self-control by precommitment. Psychological Science 13: 219–224.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bardsley, Nicholas, Robin Cubitt, Peter Moffatt, Graham Loomes, Chris Starmer, and Robert Sugden. 2008. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Breyer, Friedrich, and Joachim Weimann. 2015. Of morals, markets and mice: Be careful drawing policy conclusions from experimental findings! European Journal of Political Economy. Available online at http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/journal/aip/01762680.

  • Dreber, Anna, David G. Rand, Drew Fudenberg, and Martin A. Nowak. 2008. Winners don’t punish. Nature 452: 348–351. doi:10.1038/nature06723.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ellison, Brenna, Jayson L. Lusk, and David Davis. 2013. Looking at the label and beyond: the effects of calorie labels, health consciousness, and demographics on caloric intake in restaurants. International Journal of Behavioral Nutrition and Physical Activity 10: 21. doi:10.1186/1479-5868-10-21.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Falk, Armin, and Nora Szech. 2013. Morals and Markets. Science 340: 707–711. doi:10.1126/science.1231566.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Frey, Ulrich J., and Hannes Rusch. 2012. An evolutionary perspective on the long-term efficiency of costly punishment. Biology and Philosophy 27: 811–831. doi:10.1007/s10539-012-9327-1.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gächter, Simon, Elke Renner, and Martin Sefton. 2008. The long-run benefits of punishment. Science 322: 1510. doi:10.1126/science.1164744.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gürerk, Özgür, Bernd Irlenbusch, and Bettina Rockenbach. 2006. The competitive advantage of sanctioning institutions. Science 312: 108–111. doi:10.1126/science.1123633.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hertwig, Ralph, and Andreas Ortmann. 2001. Experimental practices in economics: A methodological challenge for psychologists? Behavioral and Brain Sciences 24: 383–451.

    Google Scholar 

  • Johnson, Eric J., and Daniel Goldstein. 2003. Do defaults save lives? Science 302: 1338–1339.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kant, Immanuel. 2004. Die religion innerhalb der Grenzen der bloßen Vernunft. Hamburg: Meiner.

    Google Scholar 

  • Knobe, Joshua, and Shaun Nichols (eds.). 2008. Experimental philosophy. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Luetge, Christoph. 2012. Fundamentals of Order Ethics: Law, business ethics and the financial crisis. Archiv für Rechts- und Sozialphilosophie Beihefte 130: 11–21.

    Google Scholar 

  • Luetge, Christoph, and Hannes Rusch. 2013. The systematic place of morals in markets. Science 341: 714. doi:10.1126/science.341.6147.714-a.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Luetge, Christoph, Hannes Rusch, and Matthias Uhl (eds.). 2014. Experimental ethics. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.

    Google Scholar 

  • Madrian, Brigitte C., and Dennis F. Shea. 2001. The power of suggestion: Inertia in 401(k) participation and savings behavior. The Quarterly Journal of Economics 116: 1149–1187.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Oullier, Olivier. 2013. Behavioural insights are vital to policy-making. Nature 501: 462–463.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Popper, Karl R. 1966. The open society and its enemies. The spell of Plato, 5th edn, vol. 1. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rusch, Hannes. 2014. Philosophy as the behaviorist views it? In Experimental ethics, ed. Christoph Luetge, Hannes Rusch, and Matthias Uhl. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rusch, Hannes, Christoph Luetge, and Eckart Voland. 2014. Experimentelle und Evolutionäre Ethik: Eine neue Synthese in der Moralphilosophie? In Bereichsethiken im interdisziplinären Dialog, ed. Matthias Maring, 163–179. Karlsruhe, Baden: KIT Scientific Publishing.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schelling, Thomas C. 2006. Micromotives and macrobehaviour. New York: W.W Norton & Co.

    Google Scholar 

  • Smith, N.Craig, Daniel G. Goldstein, and Eric J. Johnson. 2013. Choice without awareness: Ethical and policy implications of defaults. Journal of Public Policy and Marketing 32(2): 159–172.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sneddon, Andrew. 2009. Normative ethics and the prospects of an empirical contribution to assessment of moral disagreement and moral realism. The Journal of Value Inquiry 43: 447–455. doi:10.1007/s10790-009-9164-x.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Stein, Edward. 1996. Without good reason. The rationality debate in philosophy and cognitive science. Oxford, New York: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Uhl, Matthias. 2011. Do self-committers mind other-imposed commitment? An experiment on weak paternalism. Rationality, Markets, and Morals 2: 13–34.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Hannes Rusch .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2016 Springer International Publishing Switzerland

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Rusch, H., Uhl, M. (2016). Order Ethics—An Experimental Perspective. In: Luetge, C., Mukerji, N. (eds) Order Ethics: An Ethical Framework for the Social Market Economy . Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-33151-5_5

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics