Skip to main content
Log in

Using Attribution Theory to Help Frame Moral Dilemmas: An Empirical Test of the President Clinton – Monica Lewinski Case

  • Published:
Teaching Business Ethics

Abstract

This study extends theapplication of attribution theory to analyzemoral dilemmas. Kelley's model of causalattribution is proposed as a pedagogical toolin helping students organize and evaluatecomplex moral dilemmas while avoiding commonperception errors. By posing three questions,students are challenged to identify patternsand context of behaviors that help arrive atthe source cause(s) of those behaviors. To testthe usefulness of Kelley's model in analyzingmoral dilemmas, the President Clinton – MonicaLewinski case is empirically tested. Resultssupport the usefulness of Kelly's model ofcausal attribution as a valid and useful toolfor students in framing complex moral dilemmasand avoiding common perception and attributionerrors.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

REFERENCES

  • Abramson, L. Y., G. L. Metalsky and L. B. Alloy: 1989, 'Hopelessness Depression: A Theory-Based Subtype of Depression', Psychological Review 96, 358-372.

    Google Scholar 

  • Einhorn, H. J. and R. M. Hogarth: 1986, 'Judging Probable Cause', Psychological Bulletin 99, 3-19.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fischhoff, B.: 1975, 'Hindsight Not Equal Foresight: The Effect of Outcome Knowledge on Judgment Under Uncertainty', Journal of Experimental Psychology 1, 288-299.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fischhoff, B.: 1977, 'Perceived Informativeness of Facts', Journal of Experimental Psychology 3, 349-358.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fischhoff, B., P. Slovic and S. Lichtenstein: 1977, 'Knowing with Certainty: The Appropriateness of Extreme Confidence', Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance 3, 552-564.

    Google Scholar 

  • Flett, G. L. and P. L. Hewitt: 1998, 'Perfectionism in Relation to Attributions for Success or Failure', Current Psychology 17, 249-252.

    Google Scholar 

  • Graham, S., B. Weiner and G. Zucker: 1997, 'An Attributional Analysis of Punishment Goals and Public Reactions to O. J. Simpson', Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin 23, 331-346.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hawkins, S. A. and R. Hastie: 1990, 'Hindsight: Biased Judgments of past Events after the Outcomes Are Known', Psychological Bulletin 107, 311-327.

    Google Scholar 

  • Heider, F.: 1958, The Psychology of Interpersonal Relations, Wiley, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hellriegel, D., J. W. Slocum and R. W. Woodman: 2001, Organizational Behavior 9/e, South-West Publishing, Cincinnati.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kelley, H. H.: 1967, 'Attribution Theory in Social Psychology', in D. Levine (ed.), Nebraska Symposium on Motivation, University of Nebraska Press, Lincoln, pp. 192-238.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kelley, H. H.: 1972, 'Causal Schemata and the Attribution Process', in E. E. Jones, D. E. Kanouse, H. H. Kelley, R. E. Nisbett, S. Valins and B. Weiner (eds.), Attribution: Perceiving the Causes of Behavior, General Learning Press, Morrison, NJ, pp. 151-174.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kelley, H. H.: 1973, 'The Process of Causal Attribution', American Psychologist 28, 107-128.

    Google Scholar 

  • Koehler, J. J.: 1996, 'The Base Rate Fallacy Reconsidered: Descriptive, Normative and Methodological Challenges', Behavioral and Brain Sciences 19, 1-19.

    Google Scholar 

  • Krull, D.: 1993, 'Does the Grist Change the Mill? The Effect of the Perceiver's Inferential Goal on the Process of Social Inference', Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin 19, 340-348.

    Google Scholar 

  • Leddo, J., R. P. Abelson and P. H. Gross: 1984, 'Conjunctive Explanations: When Two Reasons Are Better than One', Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 47, 933-943.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lee, Y. and M. E. P. Seligman: 1997, 'Are Americans More Optimistic than the Chinese?', Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin 23, 32-40.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lee, F., M. Hallahan and T. Herzog: 1996, 'Explaining Real-life Events: How Culture and Domain Shape Attributions', Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin 22, 732-741.

    Google Scholar 

  • Locksley, A. and C. Stangor: 1984, 'Why versus How Often: Causal Reasoning and the Incidence of Judgmental Bias', Journal of Experimental Social Psychology 20, 470-483.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pennington, N. and R. Hastie: 1988, 'Explanation-based Decision Making: Effects of Memory Structure on Judgment', Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory and Cognition 3, 521-533.

    Google Scholar 

  • Peterson, C. and M. E. P. Seligman: 1984, 'Causal Explanations as a Risk Factor for Depression Theory and Evidence', Psychological Review 91 347-374.

    Google Scholar 

  • Read, S. J.: 1987, 'Constructing Causal Scenarios: A Knowledge Structure Approach to Causal Reasoning', Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 52, 288-302.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ross, L.: 1977, 'The Intuitive Psychologist and His Shortcomings: Distortions in the Attribution Process', in L. Berkowitz (ed.), Advances in Experimental Social Psychology Vol. 10, Academic Press, New York, pp. 173-219.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ross, L., T. M. Amabile and J. L. Steinmetz: 1977, 'Social Roles, Social Control and Biases in Social-perception Processes', Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 35, 485-494.

    Google Scholar 

  • Shapiro, D. H., C. E. Schwartz and J. A. Astin: 1996, 'Controlling Ourselves, Controlling Our World: Psychology's Role in Understanding Positive and Negative Consequences of Seeking and Gaining Control', American Psychologist 51, 1213-1230.

    Google Scholar 

  • Shaver, K. G.: 1985, The Attribution of Blame: Causality, Responsibility and Blame Worthiness, Springer-Verlag, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Shepperd, J. A., R. M. Arkin, A. Strathman and S. M. Baker: 1994, 'Dysphoria as a Moderator of the Relationship Between Perceived Effort and Perceived Ability', Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 66, 559-569.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tetlock, P.: 1985, 'Accountability: A Social Check on the Fundamental Attribution Error', Social Psychology Quarterly 48, 227-236.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tversky, A. and D. Kahneman: 1971, 'Belief in the Law of Small Numbers', Psychological Bulletin 76, 105-110.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tversky, A. and D. Kahneman: 1983, 'Extensional versus Ontuitive Reasoning: The Conjunction Fallacy in Probability Judgment', Psychological Review 90, 293-315.

    Google Scholar 

  • Weber, J. and J. Gillespie: 1998, 'Differences in Ethical Beliefs, Intentions and Behaviors: The Role of Beliefs and Intentions in Ethics Research Revisited,” Business and Society 37, 447-467.

    Google Scholar 

  • Weiner, B.: 1974, 'An Attributional Interpretation of Expectancy-Value Theory', in B. Weiner (ed.), Cognitive Views of Human Motivation, Academic Press, San Diego, pp. 51-70.

    Google Scholar 

  • Weiner, B.: 1985, 'An Attributional Theory of Achievement Motivation and Emotion', Psychological Review 92, 548-573.

    Google Scholar 

  • Weiner, B.: 1993, 'On Sin Versus Sickness: A Theory of Perceived Responsibility and Social Motivation', American Psychologist 48, 957-965.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Ryan, J., Boscia, M. Using Attribution Theory to Help Frame Moral Dilemmas: An Empirical Test of the President Clinton – Monica Lewinski Case. Teaching Business Ethics 7, 123–137 (2003). https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1022637518414

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1022637518414

Navigation