Skip to main content
Log in

Ethics of Ambiguity and Irony: Jacques Derrida and Richard Rorty

  • Published:
Human Studies Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

This paper examines the relation or, more precisely, tension between postmodern deconstruction and ethics by elaborating upon the ethico-political dimensions of deconstructionism. It embarks on a critical assessment of postmodern discourse on ethics in view of its political implications by analyzing Jacques Derrida's and Richard Rorty's arguments with an assumption that their positions represent a certain “logic” in the postmodern discourse on ethics. Postmodern ethics is based on incredulity with regard to traditional metanarratives, and it defines ethics in terms of sensitivity or responsibility to “otherness” and difference. Its proponents believe that the negation of modern “metanarratives” opens a way to the Other which has been marginalized and suppressed both in thought and in social practice. Derrida and Rorty represent this position with their emphasis on the ethical nature of deconstruction and the need to elaborate new languages for ethics. Despite postmodern appeal to ethics of this sort, however, postmodern thinking shows its limits in dealing with most ethical-political matters in the contemporary world. The postmodern approach to ethics, being restricted within the perspective of the individual, does not provide any determinate framework for deciding how to adjudicate conflicting ethical claims or how to link the unconditional affirmation of emancipatory ideals, enlightened social criticism, and democratic accountability in determinate political terms. In the main, this paper contends that philosophical deconstruction and “responsibility to otherness” undermine each other in the public sphere.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Bauman, Z. (1991). Modernity and Ambivalence. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bernasconi, R. (1987). Deconstruction and the Possibility of Ethics. In J. Sallis (Ed.), Deconstruction and Philosophy. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bernstein, R. (1991). The New Constellation. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Best, S. and Kellner, D. (1991). Postmodern Theory: Critical Interrogations. New York: Guilford Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bloom, H., et al. (1979). Deconstruction and Criticism. New York: Seabury Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Boyne, R. and Rattansi, A. (Eds.) (1990). Postmodernism and Society. New York: St. Martin's Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Carroll, D. (1987). Paraesthetics. New York: Methuen.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cornell, D. (1992). The Philosophy of the Limit. New York: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Critchley, S. (1992). The Ethics of Deconstruction. Oxford, UK: Blackwell.

    Google Scholar 

  • De Beauvoir, S. (1991). The Ethics of Ambiguity. Trans. B. Frechtman. New York: Citadel Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Derrida, J. (1976). Of Grammatology. Trans. G.C. Spivak. Baltimore: John Hopkins University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Derrida, J. (1978). Writing and Difference. Trans. A. Bass. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Derrida, J. (1981). Positions. Trans. A. Bass. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Derrida, J. (1982). Margins of Philosophy. Trans. A. Bass. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Derrida, J. (1983). The Principle of Reason: The University in the Eyes of its Pupils. Diacritics 19.

  • Derrida, J. (1984). No Apocalypse, Not Now (Full Speed Ahead, Seven Missiles, Seven Missives). Diacritics 20.

  • Derrida, J. (1985). Racism's Last Word. Critical Inquiry 12.

  • Derrida, J. (1988). Limited Inc. Evanston, IL.: Northwestern University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Derrida, J. (1988). The Politics of Friendship. Journal of Philosophy 85.

  • Derrida, J. (1992). Force of Law: The ‘Mystical Foundation of Autonomy.’ In D. Cornell, M. Rosenfeld and D.G. Carlson (Eds.), Deconstruction and the Possibility of Justice. New York: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gasché, R. (1986). The Tain of the Mirror. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Habermas, J. (1981). Modernity Versus Postmodernity. New German Critique 22.

  • Habermas, J. (1986). The New Obscurity. Philosophy and Social Criticism 11.

  • Habermas, J. (1987). The Philosophical Discourse of Modernity. Trans. F. Lawrence. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Habermas, J. (1989). Work and Weltanschauung: The Heidegger Controversy from a German Perspective. Critical Inquiry 15. 28 HONGLIM RYU

    Google Scholar 

  • Harvey, D. (1989). The Condition of Postmodernity. Oxford, UK: Blackwell.

    Google Scholar 

  • Harvey, I. (1986). Derrida and the Economy of Différance. Bloomington, IN: Indiana University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jay, M. (1993). Force Fields. New York: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kamuf, P. (Ed.) (1991). A Derrida Reader. New York: Columbia University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kaplan, E.A. (Ed.) (1988). Postmodernism and its Discontents. London: Verso.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kearney, R. (1984). Dialogues with Contemporary Continental Thinkers. Manchester: Manchester University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lawson, H. and Appignanesi, L. (Eds.) (1989). Dismantling Truth: Reality in the Post-Modern World. New York: St. Martin's Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Levinas, E. (1969). Totality and Infinity. Trans. A. Lingis. Pittsburgh: Duquesne University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Levinas, E. (1981). Otherwise Than Being or Beyond Essence. The Hague: Martinus Nijhoff.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lyotard, J.-F. and Thébaud, J.-L. (1985). Just Gaming. Trans. W. Godzich. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Madison, G.B. (Ed.) (1993). Working through Derrida. Evanston, IL.: Northwestern University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • McCarthy, T. (1991). Ideals and Illusions. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Norris, C. (1987). Derrida. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Norris, C. (1992). Uncritical Theory. Amherst, MA: University of Massachusetts Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rabinow, P. (Ed.) (1984). The Foucault Reader. New York: Pantheon Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rawls, J. (1971). A Theory of Justice. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rorty, R. (1979). Philosophy and the Mirror of Nature. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rorty, R. (1982). Consequences of Pragmatism. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rorty, R. (1989). Contingency, Irony, and Solidarity. New York: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rorty, R. (1991a). Philosophical Papers, vol. 1: Objectivity, Relativism, and Truth. New York: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rorty, R. (1991b). Philosophical Papers, vol. 2: Essays on Heidegger and Others. New York: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ross, A. (Ed.) (1988). Universal Abandon: The Politics of Postmodernism. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sallis, J. (Ed.) (1987). Deconstruction and Philosophy. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • White, S.K. (1991). Political Theory and Postmodernism. New York: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Ryu, H. Ethics of Ambiguity and Irony: Jacques Derrida and Richard Rorty. Human Studies 24, 5–28 (2001). https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1010769718790

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1010769718790

Keywords

Navigation