Abstract
This paper presents a qualitative comparison of opposing views of elementary matter—the Copenhagen approach in quantum mechanics and the theory of general relativity. It discusses in detail some of their main conceptual differences, when each theory is fully exploited as a theory of matter, and it indicates why each of these theories, at its presently accepted state, is incomplete without the other. But it is then argued on logical grounds that they cannot be fused, thus indicating the need for a third revolution in contemporary physics. Toward this goal, the approach discussed is one of further generalizing the theory of general relativity in a way that incorporates the inertial manifestations of matter in covariant fashion, with quantum mechanics serving as a low-energy, linear approximation. Such a theoretical extension of general relativity will be discussed, with applications in elementary particle physics, such as the appearance of mass spectra in the microdomain, as an asymptotic feature of matter, mass doublets (electron-muon and proton-heavy proton), the explanation of pair annihilation and creation from a deterministic field theory, charge quantization, and features of pions.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
A. Einstein, Autobiographical Notes, inAlbert Einstein—Philosopher-Scientist, P. A. Schilpp, ed. (Library of Living Philosophers, Evanston, 1949).
T. S. Kuhn,The Structure of Scientific Revolutions, 2nd ed. (University of Chicago, 1970).
P. A. M. Dirac,The Principle of Quantum Mechanics, 4th ed. (Cambridge, 1958), Section 81.
G. Källen,Kongelige Danske Videnskabernes Selskab 27, No. 12 (1953); reprinted inQuantum Electrodynamics, J. Schwinger, ed. (Dover, 1958), p. 398.
R. P. Feynman and A. R. Hibbs,Quantum Mechanics and the Path Integral (McGraw-Hill, 1970), Chapter 9 and p. 260.
N. Bohr and A. Einstein, inAlbert Einstein-Philosopher-Scientist, P. A. Schilpp, (Library of Living Philosophers, Evanston, 1949), pp. 201, 666.
M. Sachs,Ann. Fond. L. de Broglie 1, 129 (1976).
C. Lanczos,The Variational Principles of Mechanics, 3rd ed. (University of Toronto, 1949).
A. Einstein and W. Mayer,Preuss. Akad. Wiss. Phys.-Math. Klass. Sitz. 1932, 522.
M. Sachs,Brit. J. Phil. Sci. 27, 225 (1976).
M. Sachs,Nuovo Cimento 53B, 398 (1968).
M. Sachs,Nuovo Cimento 7B, 247;10B, 339 (1972).
M. Sachs, A proton Mass Doublet from General Relativity,Int. Centre for Theoretical Physics, Trieste, preprint 1C/80/105 (1980);Nuovo Cimento 59A, 113 (1980).
M. Sachs,Lett. Nuovo Cimento 21, 123 (1978).
M. Sachs,Nuovo Cimento 31, 98 (1964);Found. Phys. 10, 921 (1980).
M. Sachs,Int. J. Theor. Phys. 5, 161 (1972).
M. Sachs and S. L. Schwebel,Nucl. Phys. 43, 204 (1963).
M. Sachs,Nuovo Cimento 53A, 561 (1968).
M. Sachs,Lett. Nuovo Cimento 27, 586 (1980).
H. Yu and M. Sachs,Int. J. Theor. Phys. 13, 73 (1975).
M. Sachs,Nuovo Cimento 43A, 74 (1978);Lett. Nuovo Cimento 24, 577 (1979).
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Additional information
This paper is based on a seminar given at the International Centre for Theoretical Physics, Trieste, Italy, in the summer, 1980. I thank Prof. Abdus Salam and the faculty of the Centre for their hospitality in this period.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Sachs, M. Elementary particle physics from general relativity. Found Phys 11, 329–354 (1981). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00726272
Received:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00726272