Abstract
Moore and Hutchin's [1] assertion that the application of classical logic as the method of diagnostic reasoning may result in three paradoxes is critically examined.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Moore, G. W., and Hutchins, G. M.: 1981, ‘Three paradoxes of medical diagnosis’,Metamedicine 2, pp. 197–215. (this issue)
Sadegh-zadeh, K.: 1977, ‘Grundlagenprobleme einer Theorie der klinischen Praxis. Teil 1: Explikation des medizinischen Diagnosebegriffs’,Metamed 1, 76–102.
Sadegh-zadeh, K.: 1981, ‘Foundations of clinical praxiology. Part 1: The relativity of medical diagnosis’,Metamedicine 2, pp. 183–196. (this issue)
Thomasma, D. C., and Pellegrino, E. D.: 1981, ‘Philosophy of medicine as the source for medical ethics’,Metamedicine 2, 5–11.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Sadegh-Zadeh, K. The three paradoxes lost a response to Moore and Hutchins. Metamedicine 2, 217–233 (1981). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00884424
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00884424