Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Advance Directives Outside the USA: Are They the Best Solution Everywhere?

  • Published:
Theoretical Medicine Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

This article evaluates the potential role of advance directives outside of their original North American context. In order to do this, the article first analyses the historical process which has promoted advance directives in recent years. Next, it brings to light certain presuppositions which have given them force: atomistic individualism, contractualism, consumerism and entrepreneurialism, pluralism, proceduralism, and “American moralism.” The article next studies certain European cultural peculiarities which could affect advance directives: the importance of virtue versus rights, stoicism versus consumerist utilitarianism, rationalism versus empiricism, statism versus citizens' initiative, and justice versus autonomy.

The article concludes by recognising that autonomy has a transcultural value, although it must be balanced with other principles. Advance Directives can have a function in certain cases. But it does not seem adequate to delegate to advance directives more and more medical decisions, and to make them more binding everyday. It is indispensable to develop other decision-making criteria.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

REFERENCES

  1. Faden RR and Beauchamp TL. A History and Theory of Informed Consent. New York: Oxford University Press, 1986.

    Google Scholar 

  2. Emanuel EJ, Emanuel LL. Living wills: Past, present, and future. The Journal of Clinical Ethics 1990; 1: 9–19.

    Google Scholar 

  3. Kutner L. Due process of euthanasia: The living will, a proposal. Indiana Law Journal 1969; 44: 539–554.

    Google Scholar 

  4. Emanuel EJ, Weinberg DS, Gonin R, et al. How is the patient self-determination act working? An early assessment. American Journal of Medicine 1993; 95: 619–628.

    Google Scholar 

  5. See e.g.: Rubin SM, Strull WM, F ialkow MF, et al. Increasing the completion of the durable power of attorney for health care. JAMA 1994; 271: 209–212.

  6. Emanuel LL, Emanuel EJ. The medical directive: a new comprehensive advance care document. 1989; 261: 3288–3293.

    Google Scholar 

  7. Lambert P, Gibson JMC, Nathanson P. The values history: An innovation in surrogate medical decision-making. Law, Medicine & Health Care 1990; 18: 202–212.

    Google Scholar 

  8. Emanuel L. Structured advance planning. Is it finally time for physician action and reimbursement? JAMA 1995; 274: 501–503.

    Google Scholar 

  9. Stelter KL, Elliott BA, and Bruno CA. Living will completion in older adults. Archives of Internal Medicine 1992; 152: 954–959.

    Google Scholar 

  10. Teno JM, Nelson HL, Lynn J. Advance care planning priorities for ethical and empirical research. Hastings Center Report 1994; 24: (Nov-Dec) (Special Supplement) S32–6.

    Google Scholar 

  11. Sugarman J, Powe NR, Brillantes DA, Smith MK. The cost of ethics legislation: A look at the patient self-determination act. Kennedy Institute of Ethics Journal 1993; 3: 387–399.

    Google Scholar 

  12. Eisendrath SJ, and Jonsen AR. The living will: Help or hindrance? JAMA 1983; 249: 2054–2058.

    Google Scholar 

  13. Wolf SM, Boyle Ph, Callahan D, et al. Sources of concern about the patient self-determination act. New England Journal of Medicine 1991; 325: 1666–1671.

    Google Scholar 

  14. Schneiderman LJ, Kronick R, Kaplan RM, Anderson JP, Langer RD. Effects of offering advance directives on medical treatments and costs. Annals of Internal Medicine 1992; 117: 599–606.

    Google Scholar 

  15. Teno JM, Lynn J, Phillips RS, et al. Do formal advance directives affect resuscitation decision and the use of resources for seriously ill patients? The Journal of Clinical Ethics 1994; 5: 23–30.

    Google Scholar 

  16. MacIntyre A. A Short History of Ethics. New York: Macmillan, 1966.

    Google Scholar 

  17. MacIntyre A. Whose Justice? Which Rationality. Notre Dame, Indiana: University of Notre Dame Press, 1988.

    Google Scholar 

  18. De Craemer W, A cross-cultural perspective on personhood. Milbank Memorial Fund Quarterly 1983; 61: 19–34.

    Google Scholar 

  19. See e.g.: Veatch RM. The Patient-Physician Relation. The Patient as Partner, Part 2. Bloomington and Indianapolis: Indiana University Press, 1991.

  20. May WF. Code, covenant, contract, or philanthropy. Hastings Center Report 1975; 5: (Dec) 29–38.

  21. Loewy EH. Advance Directives: a question of autonomy. Cambridge Quarterly of Healthcare Ethics 1994; 3: 405–410.

    Google Scholar 

  22. Schneider CE. From consumer choice to consumer welfare. Hastings Center Report 1995; 25: (Nov-Dec) (Special Supplement), S25–8.

    Google Scholar 

  23. Wetle T. Individual preferences and advance directives. Hastings Center Report 1994; 24: (Nov-Dec) (Special Supplement), S5–8.

    Google Scholar 

  24. Engelhardt HT. The Foundations of Bioethics, 1986. New York: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  25. Ibid. p. 385.

  26. Blake DC. State interests in terminating medical treatment. Hastings Center Report 1989; 19: (May-Jun) 5–13.

    Google Scholar 

  27. Callahan D. Necessity, futility, and the good society. Journal of the American Geriatrics Society 1994; 42: 866–867.

    Google Scholar 

  28. Jonsen AR. American moralism and the origin of bioethics in the United States. The Journal of Medicine and Philosophy 1991; 16: 113–130.

    Google Scholar 

  29. Agich GJ. Reassessing autonomy in long-term care. Hastings Center Report 1990; 20: (Nov-Dec) 12–17.

    Google Scholar 

  30. Katz J. On touching “The Happy Isles”: Reflections about past, future, and present. Law, Medicine & Health Care 1989; 17: 110–113.

    Google Scholar 

  31. An excellent analysis of the conceptual presuppositions of Mediterranean bioethics can be seen in: Gracia D. The intellectual basis of bioethics in Southern European Countries. Bioethics 1993; 7: 97–107.

    Google Scholar 

  32. Laín P. La relación médico-enfermo. Madrid: Alianza Editorial, 1983 (1aEd. 1964)

    Google Scholar 

  33. In the field of poetry, we can point out to: Coplas por la Muerte de su Padre, escritas por Jorge Mantrique (1440–1479) in: Jorge Manrique: Cancionero, Cortina A , ed.Madrid: Espasa-Calpe, 1975.

  34. Cf.: Zambrano M. “La cuestión del estoicismo español”, in: Pensamiento y poesía en la vida española, Madrid, Ediciones Endymion, 1987 (1a Ed. Mexico 1939). And: Zambrano M. Séneca, Madrid, Ediciones Siruela, 1994.

  35. Veatch RM. The Patient-Physician Relation, op. cit.

  36. Thomasma DC. The philosophy of medicine in Europe: Challenges for the future. Theoretical Medicine 1985; 6: 115–123.

    Google Scholar 

  37. Aristotle, Nichomaquean Ethics, 1129b18, and 1130a9.

  38. Some peculiarities of the assistance to patients in persistent vegetative state in France can be seen in: Tassaeau F, Boucand MH, Le Gall JR, Verspieren P. Etats vegetatifs chroniques: Répercussions humaines; Aspectsmedicaux, juridiques etéthiques. Paris: Editions Ecole Nationale de la Santé Publique, 1991.

  39. Miles SH. Informed demand for non beneficial medical treatment. N Engl J Med 1991; 325: 512–515.

    Google Scholar 

  40. Paris JJ et al. Physicians' refusal of requested treatment: The case of Baby L. N Engl J Med 1990; 322: 1012–1015.

    Google Scholar 

  41. Schwartz R. Grubb A. Why Britain can't afford informed consent. Hastings Center Report 1985; 15: (Aug.) 19–25.

  42. Childress JF. The place of autonomy in bioethics. Hastings Center Report 1990; 20: (Jan-Feb) 12–17.

  43. Pellegrino ED and Thomasma DC. For the Patient's Good. The Restoration of Beneficence in Health Care. New York: Oxford University Press, 1988.

  44. Garcia D. Fundamentos de Bioética. Madrid: Eudema, 1989.

    Google Scholar 

  45. Roper WL. Effectiveness in health care: An initiative to evaluate and improve medical practice. N Engl J Med 1988; 319: 1197–1202.

    Google Scholar 

  46. Ellwood PM. Outcomes management: A technology of patient; “Experience”. N Engl J Med 1988; 318: 1549–1556.

    Google Scholar 

  47. Mariner, WK. Outcomes assessment in health care reform: Promise and limitations. Am J Law Med 1994; 20: 37–57.

    Google Scholar 

  48. Murphy, DJ. Life-sustaining therapy: A model for appropriate use. JAMA 1990; 264: 2103–2108.

    Google Scholar 

  49. Miller FG. The concept of medically indicated treatment. The Journal of Medicine and Philosophy 1993; 18: 91–98.

    Google Scholar 

  50. Council on Ethical and Judicial Affairs. Decision near the end of life. JAMA 1992; 267: 2229–2233.

    Google Scholar 

  51. Gregory DR. VA network futility guidelines: A resource of decision about withholding and withdrawing treatment. Cambridge Quarterly of Healthcare Ethics 1995; 4: 546- 548.

    Google Scholar 

  52. Jennings B. A grassroots movement in bioethics. Hastings Center Report 1988; 18: (Jun-Jul) (Special Supplement).

  53. Jennings B. et al. Grassroots bioethics revisited: Health care priorities and community values. Hastings Center Report 1990; 20: (Sep-Oct) 16–23.

    Google Scholar 

  54. Emanuel LL and Emanuel EJ. Decision at the end of life guided by communities of patients, Hastings Center Report 1993; 23: (Sep-Oct) 6–14.

    Google Scholar 

  55. Murphy DJ. Can we set futile care policies? Institutional and systemic challenges. J Am Ger Soc 1994; 42: 890–893.

    Google Scholar 

  56. White LJ. Clinical uncertainty, medical futility and practice guidelines. J Am Ger Soc 1994; 42: 899–901.

    Google Scholar 

  57. Brennan T. Ethics committees and decisions to limit care. JAMA 1988; 260: 803–807.

    Google Scholar 

  58. Dubler NN. The doctor-proxy relationship: The neglected connection. Kennedy Institute of Ethics Journal 1995; 5: 289–306.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Department of History of Medicine. School of Medicine, Complutense University of Madrid, Ciudad Universitaria s/n, 28040, Madrid, Spain

    Miguel a. Sanchez-Conzalez

Authors
  1. Miguel a. Sanchez-Conzalez
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Sanchez-Conzalez, M.a. Advance Directives Outside the USA: Are They the Best Solution Everywhere?. Theor Med Bioeth 18, 283–301 (1997). https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1005765528043

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1005765528043

Search

Navigation