Skip to main content
Log in

Partially Interpreted Relations and Partially Interpreted Quantifiers

  • Published:
Journal of Philosophical Logic Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Logics in which a relation R is semantically incomplete in a particular universe E, i.e. the union of the extension of R with its anti-extension does not exhaust the whole universe E, have been studied quite extensively in the last years. (Cf. van Benthem (1985), Blamey (1986), and Langholm (1988), for partial predicate logic; Muskens (1996), for the applications of partial predicates to formal semantics, and Doherty (1996) for applications to modal logic.) This is not so with semantically incomplete generalized quantifiers which constitute the subject of the present paper. The only systematic study of these quantifiers from a purely logical point of view, is, to the best of my knowledge, that by van Eijck (1995). We shall take here a different approach than that of van Eijck and mention some of the abstract properties of the resulting logic. Finally we shall prove that the two approaches are interdefinable.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

REFERENCES

  • Van Benthem, J., 1985, A Manual of Intensional Logic, CSLI Lecture Notes, vol.1, Stanford, distributed by University of Chicago Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Blamey, S., 1986, Partial Logic, inD. Gabbay and F. Guenthner (eds.) Handbook of Philosophical Logic III, pp. 1–70.

  • Blass, A.and Gurevich, Y., 1986, Henkin Quantifiers and Complete Problems, Annals of Pure and Applied Logic 32, pp. 1–16.

    Google Scholar 

  • Doherty, P. (ed.), 1996, Partiality, Modality, and Nonmonotonicity, CSLILecture Notes, 1–57586-031-7, Stanford, distributed by University of Chicago Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Van Eijck, J.,1995, Quantifiers and Partiality, in Jaap van der Does and J. van Eijck (eds.), Quantifiers, Logic and Language, Stanford University.

  • Feferman, S., 1984, Towards Useful Type-free Theories, Journal ofSymbolic Logic 49, pp. 237–288.

    Google Scholar 

  • Henkin, L., 1961, Some Remarks on Infinitely LongFormulas, Infinitistic Methods, Pergamon Press, Oxford and PAN, Warsaw, pp. 167–183.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kripke, S., 1975, Outline of a Theory of Truth, Journal of Philosophy 72, pp. 690–715.

    Google Scholar 

  • Langholm, T., 1988, Partiality, Truth and Persistence, CSLI Lecture Notes, vol. 15, Stanford, distributed by University of Chicago Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Muskens, R., Meaning and Partiality, CSLI LectureNotes, 1–8881526-80-1, Stanford, distributed by University of Chicago Press.

  • Sandu, G.,Partially Interpreted Generalized Quantifiers, forthcoming in Studia Logica.

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Sandu, G. Partially Interpreted Relations and Partially Interpreted Quantifiers. Journal of Philosophical Logic 27, 587–601 (1998). https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1004368325267

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1004368325267

Navigation