Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Complementarity and Scientific Rationality

  • Published:
Foundations of Physics Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Bohr’s interpretation of quantum mechanics has been criticized as incoherent and opportunistic, and based on doubtful philosophical premises. If so Bohr’s influence, in the pre-war period of 1927–1939, is the harder to explain, and the acceptance of his approach to quantum mechanics over de Broglie’s had no reasonable foundation. But Bohr’s interpretation changed little from the time of its first appearance, and stood independent of any philosophical presuppositions. The principle of complementarity is itself best read as a conjecture of unusually wide scope, on the nature and future course of explanations in the sciences (and not only the physical sciences). If it must be judged a failure today, it is not because of any internal inconsistency.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. J. Faye, Niels Bohr: His Heritage and Legacy. An Anti-Realist View of Quantum Mechanics. Science and Philosophy, Vol. 6, N. Nersessian, ed. (Kluwer, Dordrecht, 1991).

  2. D. Murdoch (1987) Neils Bohr’s Philosophy of Physics Cambridge University Press Cambridge

    Google Scholar 

  3. J. Cushing (1993) Quantum Mechanics: Historical Contingency and the Copenhagen Hegemony University of Chicago Press Chicago

    Google Scholar 

  4. M. Beller (1999) Quantum Dialogue: The Making of a Revolution University of Chicago Press Chicago

    Google Scholar 

  5. A. Valentini, On The Pilot-Wave Theory of Classical, Quantum, and Subquantum Physics, PhD thesis (International School for Advanced Studies, Trieste, 1992).

  6. S. Saunders (1999) “The ‘beables’ of relativistic pilot-wave theory” J. Butterfield C. Pagonis (Eds) From Physicsto Philosophy Cambridge University Press Cambridge

    Google Scholar 

  7. L. Broglie Particlede (1951) ArticleTitle“Remarques sur la theorie de l’onde pilote C. R. Acad. Sci 233 641–642

    Google Scholar 

  8. L. Broglie Particlede (1990) Heisenberg’s Uncertainties and the Probabilistic Interpretation of Wave Mechanics Kluwer Dordrecht

    Google Scholar 

  9. H. Brown and D. Wallace, “Solving the measurement problem: de Broglie–Bohm loses out to Everett”, Found. Phys., this volume. Available on-line at http://xxx.lanl.gov/quant-ph/0403094.

  10. D. Howard (1994) “What makes a classical concept classical? Toward a reconstruction of Niels Bohr’s philosophy of physics” J. Faye H. Folse (Eds) Niels Bohr and Contemporary Philosophy Kluwer Boston

    Google Scholar 

  11. N. Bohr (1931) Atomtheorie und Naturbeschreibung Springer Berlin

    Google Scholar 

  12. N. Bohr (1935) ArticleTitle“Can quantum-mechanical description of physical reality be considered complete?” Phys. Rev. 48 696

    Google Scholar 

  13. N. Bohr (1949) “Discussion with Einstein on epistemological problems in atomic physics” P. Schilpp (Eds) Albert Einstein: Philosopher-Scientist Open Court La Salle, IL

    Google Scholar 

  14. N. Bohr (1958) “Quantum physics and philosophy: causality and complementarity” R. Klibansky (Eds) Philosophy at Mid-Century: A Survey La Nuova Italia Editrice Florence

    Google Scholar 

  15. N. Bohr (1939) “The causality problem in atomic physics”, in New Theories in Physics International Institute of Intellectual Co-operation Paris

    Google Scholar 

  16. W. Heisenberg (1927) ArticleTitle“Überden anschaulicken Inhalt der quantentheoretischen Kinematik und Mechanik” Z. fur Physik 43 172

    Google Scholar 

  17. N. Bohr, Collected Works, Vol. VI, J. Kalckar, ed. (North Holland, Amsterdam, 1985).

  18. A. Einstein B. Podolsky Rosen (1935) ArticleTitle“Can quantum-mechanical description of physical reality be considered complete?” Phys. Rev. 47 777 Occurrence Handle10.1103/PhysRev.47.777 Occurrence Handle0012.04201

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  19. L. Rosenfeld (1983) “Bohr’s reply” J. Wheeler W. Zurek (Eds) Quantum Theory and Measurement Princeton University Press Princeton

    Google Scholar 

  20. N. Bohr (1935) ArticleTitle“Quantum mechanics and physical reality” Nature 136 65

    Google Scholar 

  21. L. Diósi, “On hybrid dynamics of the Copenhagen dichotomic world”, available on-line at http://xxx.lanl.gov/quant-ph/9903088.

  22. M. Dickson, “A view from nowhere: quantum reference frames and uncertainty”, Stud. Hist. Phil. Mod. Phys. forthcoming. Available on line at http://www.mdickson.com/pubs/Quantum\_Reference\_Frames.pdf.

  23. L. Rosenfeld (1967) “Niels Bohr in the thirties” S. Rozental (Eds) Niels Bohr---His Life and Work North Holland Amsterdam

    Google Scholar 

  24. M. Dickson (2001) “The EPR experiment: a prelude to Bohr’s reply to EPR” M. Heidelberger F. Stadler (Eds) History and Philosophy of Science---New Trends and Perspectives Kluwer Dordrecht

    Google Scholar 

  25. N. Bohr, “Chemistry and the quantum theory of atomic constitution”, J. Chem. Soc. 349 (1932).

  26. E. Scheibe (1973) The Logical Analysis of Quantum Mechanics Pergamon Press Oxford

    Google Scholar 

  27. C. Rovelli, “Relational quantum mechanics”, in Quo Vadis Quantum Mechanics, C. Avshalom, S. Dolev, and N. Kolenda, eds. (Springer, Berlin, forthcoming).

  28. C. Fuchs, “Quantum foundations in the light of quantum information”, available on-line at http://xxx.lanl.gov/quant-ph/0106166.

  29. A. Zeilinger (1999) ArticleTitle“A foundational principle for quantum mechanics” Found. Phys. 29 631

    Google Scholar 

  30. N. Bohr and L. Rosenfeld, “Zur Frage der Messbarkeit der elektromagnetischen Feldgrössen”, Mat.-fys. Medd. Dan. Vid. Selsk., 12 (1933). Translated as “On the question of the measurability of electromagnetic field equations”, in Selected Papers of Léon Rosenfeld, R. Cohen and J. Stachel, eds. (Reidel, Dordrecht, 1979).

  31. N. Bohr L. Rosenfeld (1950) ArticleTitle“Field and charge measurements in quantum electrodynamics” Phys. Rev. 78 794

    Google Scholar 

  32. N. Bohr (1963) “Light and life revisited”, in Essays 1958–1962 on Atomic Physics and Human Knowledge Ox Bow Press Woodbridge

    Google Scholar 

  33. S. Saunders (1993) “To what physics corresponds” S. French H. Kaminga (Eds) Correspondence, Invariance, and Heuristics; Essays in Honour of Heinz Post Kluwer Amsterdam

    Google Scholar 

  34. Electrons et Photons–-Rapports et Discussions du Cinquième Conseil de Physique tenu à Bruxelles du 24 au 29 Octobre 1927 sous les Auspices de l’Institut International de Physique Solvay (Gauthier-Villars, Paris, 1928). Translated as Electrons and Photons–-Proceedings of the 5th Solvay Conference, G. Bacciagaluppi and A. Valentini, eds. (Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, forthcoming).

  35. H. Brown C. Dewdney G. Horton (1995) ArticleTitle“Bohm particles and their detection in the light of neutron interferometry” Found. Phys. 25 329

    Google Scholar 

  36. N. Bohr (1939) ArticleTitle“Natural philosophy and human culture” Nature 143 268

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Faculty of Philosophy, University of Oxford, 10 Merton St., Oxford, OX1 4JJ, UK

    Simon Saunders

Authors
  1. Simon Saunders
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Simon Saunders.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Saunders, S. Complementarity and Scientific Rationality. Found Phys 35, 417–447 (2005). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10701-004-1982-x

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10701-004-1982-x

Keywords

Search

Navigation