Abstract
A variety of ideas arising in decoherence theory, and in the ongoing debate over Everett's relative-state theory, can be linked to issues in relativity theory and the philosophy of time, specifically the relational theory of tense and of identity over time. These have been systematically presented in companion papers (Saunders 1995; 1996a); in what follows we shall consider the same circle of ideas, but specifically in relation to the interpretation of probability, and its identification with relations in the Hilbert Space norm. The familiar objection that Everett's approach yields probabilities different from quantum mechanics is easily dealt with. The more fundamental question is how to interpret these probabilities consistent with the relational theory of change, and the relational theory of identity over time. I shall show that the relational theory needs nothing more than the physical, minimal criterion of identity as defined by Everett's theory, and that this can be transparently interpreted in terms of the ordinary notion of the chance occurrence of an event, as witnessed in the present. It is in this sense that the theory has empirical content.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Similar content being viewed by others
REFERENCES
Albert, D. and B. Loewer: 1988, ‘Interpreting the Many-Worlds Interpretation’, Synthese 77, 195–213.
Birkhoff, G. D.: 1931, ‘Proof of the Ergodic Theorem’, Proceedings of the National Academy of Science 17, 656–700.
Deutsch, D.: 1985, ‘Quantum Theory as a Universal Physical Theory’, International Journal of Theoretical Physics 24, 1–41.
DeWitt, B.: 1970, Physics Today 23(9), reprinted in DeWitt and Graham, 1973, pp. 155–67.
DeWitt, B. and N. Graham: 1973, The Many-Worlds Interpretation of Quantum Mechanics, Princeton University Press, Princeton.
Dowker, F. and A. Kent: 1996, ‘On the Consistent Histories Approach to Quantum Mechanics’, Journal of Statistical Physics 82, 1575–646.
Einstein, A.: 1903, ‘Eine Theorie der Grundlagen der Thermodynamik’, Annalen der Physik 11, 170–187; translated in The Collected Papers of Albert Einstein, Vol. 2, J. Stachel (ed.), Princeton University Press, Princeton, 1989.
Einstein, A.: 1905, ‘Zur Elektrodynamik bewegter Körper’, Annalen der Physik 17, 891–921; translated in The Collected Papers of Albert Einstein, Vol. 2, J. Stachel (ed.), Princeton University Press, Princeton, 1989.
Everett, H.: 1957, ‘Relative State Formulation of Quantum Mechanics’, Reviews of Modern Physics 29, 454–62, reprinted in DeWitt and Graham (1973).
Everett, H.: 1973, ‘The Theory of the Universal Wave Function’, Ph.D. Thesis, 1957; published in DeWitt and Graham (1973).
Fahri, E., J. Goldstone and S. Gutman: 1989, ‘How Probability Arises in Quantum Mechanics’, Annals of Physics 192, 368–82.
Finkelstein, D.: 1963, ‘The Logic of Quantum Physics’, Transactions of the New York Academy of Science 25, 621–37.
Gleason, A.: 1957, ‘Measures on the Closed Subspaces of a Hilbert Space’, Journal of Mathematics and Mechanics 6, 885–93.
Gödel, K.: 1949, ‘A Remark About the Relationship Between Relativity Theory and Idealistic Philosophy’, in A. Schilpp (ed.), Albert Einstein, Philosopher-Scientist, Open Court, La Salle.
Graham, N.: 1973, ‘The Measurement of Relative Frequency’, in B. De Witt and N. Graham (eds.), The Many-Worlds Interpretation of Quantum Mechanics, Princeton University Press, Princeton.
Halliwell, J. J.: 1994, ‘Aspects of the Decoherent Histories Approach to Quantum Mechanics’, in L. Diósi (ed.), Stochastic Evolution of Quantum States in Open Systems and in Measurement Processes, World Scientific, Singapore, pp. 54–68.
Hemmo, M.: 1996, Quantum Mechanics Without Collapse: Modal Interpretations, Histories, and Many Worlds, Ph.D. Thesis, University of Cambridge, Cambridge.
Lewis, D.: 1983a, ‘Survival and Identity’, in Philosophical Papers, Vol. I, Oxford University Press, Oxford.
Lewis, D.: 1983b, ‘A Subjectivist's Guide to Objective Chance’, in Philosophical Papers, Vol. II, Oxford University Press, Oxford.
Lockwood, M.: 1989, Mind, Brain, and The Quantum, Basil Blackwell, Oxford.
Lockwood, M.: 1996, British Journal for the Philosophy of Science 47, 229–32.
Loewer, B.: 1996, ‘Comment on Lockwood’, British Journal for the Philosophy of Science 47, 229–32.
Maudlin, T.: 1994, Quantum Non-Locality and Relativity, Blackwell, Oxford.
Maxwell, N.: 1985, ‘Are Probabilism and Special Relativity Incompatible?’, Philosophy of Science 52, 23–43.
McTaggart, J.: 1927, The Nature of Existence, Vol. 2, C. D. Broad (ed.), Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.
Pais, A.: 1982, Subtle is the Lord; the Science and the Life of Albert Einstein, Oxford University Press, Oxford.
Parfit, D.: 1984, Reasons and Persons, Oxford University Press, Oxford.
Plato, J. von: 1994, Creating Modern Probability, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.
Saunders, S.: 1993, ‘Decoherence and Evolutionary Adaptation’, Physics Letters A 184, 1–5.
Saunders, S.: 1995, ‘Time, Quantum Mechanics, and Decoherence’, Synthese 102, 235–66.
Saunders, S.: 1996a, ‘Time, Quantum Mechanics, and Tense’, Synthese 107, 19–53.
Saunders, S.: 1996b, ‘Relativism’, in R. Clifton (ed.), Perspectives on Quantum Reality, Kluwer, Dordrecht.
Saunders, S.: 1996c, ‘Comment on Lockwood’, British Journal of Philosophy of Science 47, 241–48.
Savitt, S.: 1994, ‘The Replacement of Time’, Australasian Journal of Philosophy 72, 463–74.
Sklar, L.: 1993, Physics and Chance, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.
Tappenden, P.: 1998, Cerebral Content and the World, Ph.D. Thesis, University of London, London.
Weyl, H.: 1949, Philosophy of Mathematics and Natural Science, Princeton University Press, Princeton.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Saunders, S. Time, Quantum Mechanics, and Probability. Synthese 114, 373–404 (1998). https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1005079904008
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1005079904008