Skip to main content
Log in

An axiomatic basis for distributional equality in utilitarianism

  • Published:
Erkenntnis Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

An axiomatic basis for a social preference ordering with interval-scaled utility levels satisfying the principles of anonymity and pareto superiority is elaborated. The ordering is required to be sensitive to distributional equality: Redistribution of utility income from poor to rich persons without changing their social rank should lead to a superior evaluation. The axiom of separability is weakened in order to make it compatible with distributional equality. We prove that every continuous ordering satisfying the upper axioms can be represented by a utility function which is positively linear on the convex cone of rank-ordered utility vectors. A modified unnormalized Gini coefficient is one possible choice, but it contradicts, as well as related proposals, the principle of adequacy of means for some distribution problems.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Arrow, K. J.General Competetive Analysis, Holden-Day, San Francisco.

  2. Fishburn, P. C.: 1966, ‘A Note on Recent Developments in Additive Utility Theories for Multiple-Factor Situations’,Operations Research 14, 1143–1148.

    Google Scholar 

  3. Kern, L.: 1977, ‘Comparative Distributive Ethics’, in: Gottinger, H. W. and Leinfeller, W. (eds.),Decision Theory and Social Ethics, Issues in Social Choice, Dordecht, pp. 187–200.

    Google Scholar 

  4. Mendola, J.: 1990, ‘An Ordinal Modification of Classical Utilitarianism’,Erkenntnis 33, 73–88.

    Google Scholar 

  5. Sen, Amartya K.: 1973,On Economic Inequality, Clarendon Press, Oxford.

    Google Scholar 

  6. Sen, Amartya K.: 1973, ‘On Ignorance and Equal Distribution’,The American Economic Review 63(5), 1022–1024.

    Google Scholar 

  7. Suppes, P.: 1977, ‘The Distributive Justice of Income Inequality’, in: Gottinger, H. W. and Leinfeller, W. (eds.),Decision Theory and Social Ethics, Issues in Social Choice, Dordrecht, pp. 303–320.

    Google Scholar 

  8. Trapp, R. W.: 1990, ‘Utilitarianism Incorporating Justice’ — A Decentralized Model of Ethical Decision Making’,Erkenntnis 32, 341–381.

    Google Scholar 

  9. Trapp, R. W. and A. Schäfer: 1989, ‘Distributional Equality in Non-Classical Utilitarism — A Proof of Lerner's Theorem for “Utilitarism Incorporating Justice”’,Theory and Decision 26(2), 157–173.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Schoch, D. An axiomatic basis for distributional equality in utilitarianism. Erkenntnis 40, 121–132 (1994). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01128718

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01128718

Keywords

Navigation