Notes
This is letter 4153 in the Darwin Correspondence Project, dated May 11, 1863.
An overview of this literature is given by Waters (2003).
Barlow (1958), pp. 118–119.
Of course, many of Darwin’s readers embraced common descent but rejected natural selection. Did Darwin underestimate the independent strength of his arguments for common descent? Perhaps. But it would be wrong to think that those who rejected natural selection did not have mechanistic convictions of their own. For instance, the inheritance of acquired characters and orthogenetic evolution were live alternatives (Bowler 1988).
The electronic version was downloaded from Amazon.com in December 2011.
References
Barlow N (1958) The autobiography of Charles Darwin, 1809–1882. Collins, London
Bowler PJ (1988) The non-darwinian revolution. Johns Hopkins University Press, Baltimore
Darwin C (1859) The origin of species. John Murray, London
Darwin C (1871) The descent of man, and selection in relation to sex. John Murray, London
Lewontin RC, Dunn LC (1960) The evolutionary dynamics of a polymorphism in the house mouse. Genetics 45:705–722
Sober E (2008) Evidence and evolution: the logic behind the science. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge
Sober E (2009) Did Darwin write the origin backwards? Proc Natl Acad Sci 106:10048–10055
Sober E, Wilson DS (1999) Unto others: the evolution and psychology of unselfish behavior. Harvard University Press, Cambridge (MA)
Waters CK (2003) The arguments in the origin of species. In: Hodge J, Radick G (eds) The Cambridge companion to Darwin. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, pp 116–139
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Scholl, R. Elliott Sober: Did Darwin Write the Origin Backwards? Philosophical Essays on Darwin’s Theory. Acta Biotheor 60, 323–328 (2012). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10441-012-9151-7
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10441-012-9151-7