REFERENCES
Annas, D. (1978): ‘A Contextualist Theory of Epistemic Justification’, American Philosophical Quarterly 15, 213–219.
Austin, J.L. (1946): ‘Other Minds’, Proceedings of the Aristotelian Society 20(suppl.), 149–187.
Bach, K. (1994): ‘Conversational Impliciture’, in Mind and Language 9, 124–162.
Bach, K. (2000): ‘Quantification, Qualification and Context: A Reply to Stanley and Szabó’, Mind and Language 15, 262–283.
Belnap, N. and Steel, T. (1976): The Logic of Questions and Answers, New Haven: Yale University Press.
Chomsky, N. (1981): Lectures on Government and Binding, Dordrecht: Foris.
Cohen, S. (1988): ‘How to be a Fallibilist’, in Philosophical Perspectives 2, 91–123.
Cohen, S. (1999): ‘Contextualism, Skepticism, and the Structure of Reasons’, Philosophical Perspectives 13, 57–89.
DeRose, K. (1992): ‘Contextualism and Knowledge Attributions’, Philosophy and Phenomenological Research 52, 913–929.
DeRose, K. (1995): ‘Solving the Skeptical Problem’, The Philosophical Review 104, 1–52.
DeRose, K. (1999): ‘Contextualism: An Explanation and Defense’, in Greco and Sosa (eds.), The Blackwell Guide to Epistemology (pp. 187–205), Oxford: Basil Blackwell.
Dewey, J. (1938): Logic: The Theory of Inquiry, New York: Holt, Rinehart, and Winston.
Dretske, F. (1970): ‘Epistemic Operators’, The Journal of Philosophy 67, 1007–1023.
Dretske, F. (1972): ‘Contrastive Statements’, Philosophical Review 81, 411–437.
Dretske, F. (1981): ‘The Pragmatic Dimension of Knowledge’, Philosophical Studies 40, 363–378.
Fiengo, R. and May, R. (1994): Indices and Identity, Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
Goldman, A. (1976): ‘Discrimination and Perceptual Knowledge’, Journal of Philosophy 73, 771–791.
Hajicova, E., Partee, B. and Sgall, P. (1998): Topic-Focus Articulation, Tripartite Structures, and Semantic Content, Dordrecht: Kluwer.
Hale, K. and Keyser, S.J. (1993): ‘On Argument Structure and the Lexical Expression of Syntactic Relations’, in Hale and Keyser (eds.), The View from Building 20: Essays in Honor of Sylvain Bromberger (pp. 53–109), Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
Hamblin, C.L. (1958): ‘Questions’, The Australasian Journal of Philosophy 36, 159–168.
Hawthorne, J. (2003): ‘Knowledge and Lotteries’, Oxford: Oxford University Press..
Heller, M. (1999): ‘Contextualism and Anti-Luck Epistemology’, Philosophical Perspectives 13, 115–129.
Higginbotham, J. (1993): ‘Interrogatives’, in Hale and Keyser (eds.), The View from Building 20: Essays in Honor of Sylvain Bromberger (pp. 195–228), Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
Higginbotham, J. (1996): ‘The Semantics of Questions’, in Lappin (ed.), The Handbook of Contemporary Semantic Theory (pp. 361–383), Oxford: Basil Blackwell.
Hintikka, J. (1981): ‘On the Logic of an Interrogative Model of Scientific Inquiry’, Synthese 47, 69–84.
Hookway, C. (1996): ‘Questions of Context’, Proceedings of the Aristotelian Society 96, 1–16.
Kaplan, D. (1977): ‘Demonstratives’, in Almog, Perry and Wettstein (eds.), Themes from Kaplan (pp. 481–563), Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1989.
Lappin, S. (1996): ‘The Interpretation of Ellipsis’, in Lappin (ed.), The Handbook of Contemporary Semantic Theory (pp. 145–175), Oxford: Basil Blackwell.
Levinson, S. (1983): Pragmatics, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Lewis, D. (1979): ‘Scorekeeping in a Language Game’, Journal of Philosophical Logic 8, 339–359.
Lewis, D. (1996): ‘Elusive Knowledge’, The Australasian Journal of Philosophy 74, 549–567.
May, R. (1985): Logical Form: Its Structure and Derivation, Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
Neta, R. (forthcoming a): ‘S knows that p’, Nous.
Neta, R. (forthcoming b): ‘Skepticism, Contextualism, and Semantic Self-Knowledge’, Philosophy and Phenomenological Research.
Partee, B. (1989): ‘Binding Implicit Variables in Quantified Contexts’, in Proceedings of the Chicago Linguistics Society, vol. 25 (pp. 342–365), Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
Partee, B. (1991): ‘Topic, Focus, and Quantification’, in Moore and Wyner (eds.), Proceedings from SALT I (pp. 257–280), Ithaca: Cornell University Press.
Richard, M. (1990): Propositional Attitudes: An Essay on Thoughts and How We Ascribe Them, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Rooth, M. (1992): ‘A Theory of Focus Interpretation’, Natural Language Semantics 1, 75–116.
Rooth, M. (1996): ‘Focus’, in Lappin (ed.), The Handbook of Contemporary Semantic Theory (pp. 271–297), Oxford: Basil Blackwell.
Schaffer, J. (forthcoming a): ‘Skepticism, Contextualism, and Discrimination’, Philosophy and Phenomenological Research.
Schaffer, J. (forthcoming b): ‘What Shifts? Thresholds, Standards, or Alternatives?’, in Preyer and Peter (eds.), Contextualism in Philosophy, Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Schaffer, J. (ms.): ‘Contrastive Knowledge’.
Schiffer, S. (1996): ‘Contextualist Solutions to Scepticism’, Proceedings of the Aristotelian Society 96, 317–333.
Sinnot-Armstrong, W. (ms.): ‘Classy Pyrrhonism’.
Sosa, E. (1986): ‘On Knowledge and Context’, The Journal of Philosophy 83, 584–585.
Sperber, D. and Wilson, D. (1986): Relevance: Communication and Cognition, Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
Stalnaker, R. (1998): ‘On the Representation of Context’, Context and Content (1999) (pp. 96–113), Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Stalnaker, R. (this volume): ‘Comments on “From Contextualism to Contrastivism in Epistemology”’.
Stanley, J. (2000): ‘Context and Logical Form’, Linguistics and Philosophy 23, 391–434.
Stine, G.C. (1976): ‘Skepticism, Relevant Alternatives, and Deductive Closure’, Philosophical Studies 29, 249–261.
Van Fraassen, B. (1980): The Scientific Image, Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Vogel, J. (1999): ‘The New Relevant Alternatives Theory’, Philosophical Perspectives 13, 155–180.
Williams, M. (1996): Unnatural Doubts, Princeton: Princeton University Press.
Williamson, T. (2000): Knowledge and its Limits, Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Schaffer, J. From Contextualism to Contrastivism. Philosophical Studies 119, 73–103 (2004). https://doi.org/10.1023/B:PHIL.0000029351.56460.8c
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1023/B:PHIL.0000029351.56460.8c