Skip to main content
Log in

Machiavellianism, Profit, and the Dimensions of Ethical Judgment: A Study of Impact

Journal of Business Ethics Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Research by Reidenbach and Robin (1990) provides a means to study the differential impact of three dimensions of attitude toward ethics: moral equity, relativism, and contractualism. It is hypothesized that moral equity will be the most significant predictor of ethical judgment and intent to act. It is also hypothesized that Machiavellianism and profit will affect relativism and contractualism dimensions, but not moral equity. Additionally, it is hypothesized that Machiavellianism will interact with profit to affect intent to act. Moral equity was found to be the only predictor of ethical judgment, and moral equity and contractualism were predictors of intent to act. Machiavellianism impacted contractualism, but not relativism. Corporate profit did not affect either ethical judgment or intent to act, and did not interact with Machiavellianism. Implications for business ethics education and training are discussed.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Ajzen, I.: 2001, 'Nature and Operation of Attitudes', in S. T. Fiske, D. L. Schacter and C. Zahn-Waxler (eds.), Annual Review of Psychology: V. 52 (Annual Reviews: Stanford, CA.), pp. 27-58.

    Google Scholar 

  • Anderson, D. R., D. J. Sweeney and T. A. Williams: 1993, Statistics for Business and Economics (5th ed.), (West Publishing, Minneapolis/St. Paul, MN).

    Google Scholar 

  • Christie, R., and F.L. Geis: 1970. Studies in Machiavellianism. (New York: Academic Press).

    Google Scholar 

  • Chang, K. and C. G. Ding: 1995. 'The Influence of Culture on Industrial Buying Selection Criteria in Taiwan and Mainland China', Industrial Marketing Management 24, 277-284.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cox, D. R. and E. J. Snell: 1989, The Analysis of Binary Data, 2nd ed. (Chapman and Hall, London).

    Google Scholar 

  • Dubinsky, A. J. and B. Loken: 1989, 'Analyzing Ethical Decision Making in Marketing', Journal of Business Research 19, 83-107.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dukerich, J. M., F. J. Milliken and D. A. Cowan: 1990, 'In-Basket Exercises as a Methodology for Studying Information Processing', Simulation and Gaming 21(4), 397-410.

    Google Scholar 

  • Etzioni, A.: 2002, 'When it Comes to Ethics, B-schools get an F', The Washington Post (August 4), B4.

  • Ferrell, O. C. and L. G. Gresham: 1985, 'A Contingency Framework for Understanding Ethical Decision Making in Marketing', Journal of Marketing 49(3), 87-96.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fishbein, M. and I. Ajzen: 1975, Belief, Attitude, Intentions and Behavior: An Introduction to Theory and Research (Addison-Wesley, Boston).

    Google Scholar 

  • Flory, S. M., T. J. Phillips, Jr., R. E. Reidenbach and D. P. Robin: 1992, 'A Multidimensional Analysis of Selected Ethical Issues in Accounting', The Accounting Review 67(2), 284-302.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hegarty, W. H. and H. P. Sims, Jr.: 1978, 'Some Determinants of Unethical Decision Behavior', Journal of Applied Psychology 63, 451-457.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hegarty, W. H. and H. P. Sims, Jr.: 1979, 'Organization Philosophy, Policies, and Objectives Related to Unethical Decision Behavior: A Laboratory Experiment', Journal of Applied Psychology 64, 331-338.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hofstede, G.: 2001, Culture's Consequences: Comparing Values, Behaviors, Institutions, and Organizations Across Nations, 2nd ed. (Sage Publications, Thousand Oaks, CA).

    Google Scholar 

  • Hunt, S. D. and S. J. Vitell: 1986, 'A General Theory of Marketing Ethics', Journal of Macromarketing 6(1), 5-16.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jones, T. M.: 1991, 'Ethical Decision Making by Individuals in Organizations: An Issue-Contingent Model', Academy of Management Review 16, 366-395.

    Google Scholar 

  • LaTour, M. S. and T. L. Henthorne: 1994, 'Ethical Judgments of Sexual Appeals in Print Advertising', Journal of Advertising XXIII(3), 81-90.

    Google Scholar 

  • Reidenbach, R. E. and D. P. Robin: 1988, 'Some Initial Steps Toward Improving The Measurement of Ethical Evaluations of Marketing Activities', Journal of Business Ethics 7, 871-879.

    Google Scholar 

  • Reidenbach, R. E. and D. P. Robin: 1990, 'Toward the Development of a Multidimensional Scale for Improving Evaluations of Business Ethics', Journal of Business Ethics 9, 639-653.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rest, J. R.: 1986, Moral Development: Advances in Theory and Research (Praeger, New York).

    Google Scholar 

  • Robinson, D. C. and W. T. Ross, Jr.: 1995, 'Decision-Making Processes on Ethical Issues: The Impact of a Social Contract Perspective', Business Ethics Quarterly 5, 213-240.

    Google Scholar 

  • Robinson, J. P. and P R. Shaver: 1973, Measures of Social Psychological Attitudes (Institute for Social Research, Ann Arbor, MI).

    Google Scholar 

  • Simpson, P. M., B. Brown and R. E. Widing: 1998, 'The Association of Ethical Judgment of Advertising and Selected Advertising Effectiveness Response Variables', Journal of Business Ethics 17, 125-136.

    Google Scholar 

  • Singhapakdi, A.: 1993, 'Ethical Perceptions of Marketers: The Interaction Effects of Machiavellianism and Organizational Ethical Culture', Journal of Business Ethics 12, 407-418.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tansey, R., M. R. Hyman and G. Brown: 1992, 'Ethical Judgments about Wartime Ads Depicting Combat', Journal of Advertising XXI(3), 57-74.

    Google Scholar 

  • Trevino, L. K.: 1986, 'Ethical Decision Making in Organizations: A Person-Situationist Model', Academy of Management Review 11, 601-617.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Schepers, D.H. Machiavellianism, Profit, and the Dimensions of Ethical Judgment: A Study of Impact. Journal of Business Ethics 42, 339–352 (2003). https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1022552610368

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1022552610368

Navigation