Skip to main content
Log in

Propositional attitude psychology as an ideal type

  • Published:
Topoi Aims and scope Submit manuscript

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

References

  • Anderson, John R.: 1978, ‘Arguments concerning representations for mental imagery’,Psychological Reviews 85, 249–77.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Baylor, G. W.: 1971, ‘Programs and protocol analysis on a mental imagery task’,First Joint International Conference on Artificial Intelligence. n.p.

  • Burge, Tyler: 1979, ‘Individualism and the mental’, inMidwest Studies in Philosophy IV,Studies in Metaphysics, ed. Peter A. French, Thedor E. Uehling, Jr., and Howard K. Wettstein, University of Minnesota Press, Minneapolis, pp. 73–122.

    Google Scholar 

  • Churchland, Patricia S.: 1980, ‘A perspective on mind-brain research’,Journal of Philosophy 77, 185–207.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Churchland, Patricia S.: 1986,Neurophilosophy, MIT Press, Cambridge, Mass.

    Google Scholar 

  • Churchland, Patricia S.: 1987, ‘Epistemology in the age of neuroscience’,Journal of Philosophy 84, 544–552.

    Google Scholar 

  • Churchland, Paul M.: 1989,A Neurocomputational Perspective, MIT Press, Cambridge, Mass.

    Google Scholar 

  • Churchland, Paul M. and Churchland, Patricia S.: 1983, ‘Stalking the wild epistemic engine’,Noûs 17, 5–18.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Davidson, Donald: 1980,Essays on Actions and Events, Clarendon Press, Oxford.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dennett, Daniel: 1969,Content and Consciousness, Routledge and Kegan Paul, London.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dennett, Daniel: 1978,Brainstorms, Bradford Books, Cambridge, Mass.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dennett, Daniel: 1987,The Intentional Stance, MIT Press, Cambridge, Mass.

    Google Scholar 

  • Farah, M. J.: 1984, ‘The neurological basis of mental imagery: A computational analysis’,Cognition 18, 243–61.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Field, Hartry: 1973, ‘Theory change and the indeterminacy of reference’,Journal of Philosophy 70, 462–81.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Field, Hartry: 1981, ‘Mental representation’, inReadings in Philosophy of Psychology, Vol. 2, ed. Ned Block, Harvard University Press, Cambridge, Mass., pp. 78–114.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fodor, Jerry A.: 1975,The Language of Thought, Thomas Crowell, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fodor, Jerry A.: 1981a,Representations: Philosophical Essays on the Foundations of Cognitive Science, MIT Press, Cambridge, Mass.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fodor, Jerry A.: 1981b, ‘Imagistic representation’, inImagery, ed. Ned Block, MIT Press, Cambridge Mass., pp. 63–86.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fodor, Jerry A.: 1987,Psychosemantics, MIT Press, Cambridge, Mass.

    Google Scholar 

  • Forbus, K. D.: 1983, ‘Qualitative reasoning about space and motion’, inMental Models, ed. D. Genter and A. L. Stevens, Lawrence Erlbaum, Hillsdale, N.J., pp. 53–74.

    Google Scholar 

  • Friedman, Milton: 1979, ‘The methodology of positive economics’, inPhilosophy and Economic Theory, ed. Frank Hahn and Martin Hollis, Oxford University Press, Oxford, pp. 18–35.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gardner, Howard: 1985,The Mind's New Science: A History of the Cognitive Revolution, Basic Books, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Goodman, Nelson: 1972,Problems and Projects, Hackett, Indianapolis.

    Google Scholar 

  • Grandy, Richard C.: 1973, ‘Reference, meaning, and belief’,Journal of Philosophy 70.

  • Harman, Gilbert: 1973,Thought, Princeton University Press, Princeton.

    Google Scholar 

  • Haugeland, John: 1981, ‘The nature and plausibility of cognitivism’, inMind Design, ed. John Haugeland, MIT Press, Cambridge, Mass., pp. 243–81.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hills, David: 1981, ‘Mental representation and languages of thought’, inReadings in Philosophy of Psychology, Vol. 2, ed. Ned Block, Harvard University Press, Cambridge, Mass., pp. 11–20.

    Google Scholar 

  • Johnson-Laird, Philip N.: 1983,Mental Models, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Johnson-Laird, Philip N.: 1988,The Computer and the Mind: An Introduction to Cognitive Science, Harvard University Press, Cambridge, Mass.

    Google Scholar 

  • Johnson-Laird, P. N. and Wason, P. C. (ed.): 1977,Thinking: Readings in Cognitive Science, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kitcher, Patricia: 1984, ‘In defense of intentional psychology’,Journal of Philosophy 81, 89–106.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kosslyn, Stephen Michael: 1980,Image and Mind, Harvard University Press, Cambridge, Mass.

    Google Scholar 

  • Loar, Brian: 1981,Mind and Meaning, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, Mass.

    Google Scholar 

  • Neisser, Ulrich: 1967,Cognitive Psychology, Appleton Century Croft, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nisbett, Richard and Ross, Lee: 1980,Human Inference, Prentice-Hall, Englewood Cliffs.

    Google Scholar 

  • Putnam, Hilary: 1975,Mind, Language, and Reality: Philosophical Papers, Vol. 2, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pylyshyn, Z. W.: 1973, ‘What the mind's eye tells the brain: A critique of mental imagery’,Psychological Bulletin 80, 1–24.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pylyshyn, Z. W.: 1981, ‘The imagery debate: Analog media versus tacit knowledge’, inImagery, ed. Ned Block, MIT Press, Cambridge, Mass., pp. 151–206.

    Google Scholar 

  • Quine, W. V. O.: 1960,Word and Object, MIT Press, Cambridge, Mass.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rips, Lance: 1986, ‘Mental muddles’, inThe Representation of Knowledge and Belief, ed. Myles Brand and Robert M. Hamish, University of Arizona Press, Tucson, pp. 258–286.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schwartz, Justin: forthcoming, ‘Who's afraid of multiple realizability?’, inClosing the Gap: Symbolic vs Subsymbolic Processing, ed. John Dinsmore, Lawrence Erlbaum, Hillsdale, N.J.

  • Shepard, R. N. and Metzler, J.: 1977, ‘Mental rotation of three-dimensional objects’, in Johnson-Laird and Wason, 1977, pp. 532–35.

  • Sterelny, Kim: 1990,The Representational Theory of Mind, Basil Blackwell, Oxford.

    Google Scholar 

  • Stich, Stephen P.: 1983,From Folk Psychology to Cognitive Science: The Case Against Belief, MIT Press, Cambridge, Mass.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wittgenstein, Ludwig: 1958,Philosphical Investigations, 3rd ed., transl. by G. E. M. Anscombe, MacMillan, New York.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Schwartz, J. Propositional attitude psychology as an ideal type. Topoi 11, 5–26 (1992). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00768296

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00768296

Keywords

Navigation