Abstract
It is commonly argued that the rules of language, as distinct from its semantic features, are the characteristics which most clearly distinguish language from the communication systems of other species. A number of linguists (e.g., Chomsky 1972, 1980; Pinker 1994) have suggested that the universal features of grammar (UG) are unique human adaptations showing no evolutionary continuities with any other species. However, recent summaries of the substantive features of UG are quite remarkable in the very general nature of the features proposed. While the syntax of any given language can be quite complex, the specific rules vary so much between languages that the truly universal (i.e. innate) aspects of grammar are not complex at all. In fact, these features most closely resemble a set of general descriptions of our richly complex semantic cognition, and not a list of specific rules. General principles of the evolutionary process suggest that syntax is more properly understood as an emergent characteristic of the explosion of semantic complexity that occurred during hominid evolution. It is argued that grammatical rules used in given languages are likely to be simply conventionalized, invented features of language, and not the result of an innate, grammar-specific module. The grammatical and syntactic regularities that are found across languages occur simply because all languages attempt to communicate the same sorts of semantic information.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Bates, E. (1992), ‘Language development’, Current Opinion in Neurobiology 2, pp. 180–185.
Bates, E. and MacWhinney, B. (1990), ‘Welcome to functionalism’, Behavioural and Brain Sciences 13, pp. 727–728.
Bates, E., Thal, D. and Marchman, V. (1991), ‘Symbols and syntax: A Darwinian approach to language development’, in N. Krasnegor, D. Rumbaugh, R. Schiefelbusch and M. Studdert-Kennedy, eds., Biological and Behavioural Determinants of Language Development, Hillsdale, New Jersey: Erlbaum, pp. 29–65.
Bever, T. G. (1970), ‘The cognitive basis for linguistic structures’,, in J. R. Hayes, ed., Cognition and the Development of Language, New York: Wiley & Sons, pp. 279–362.
Bickerton, D. (1990), Language & Species. Chicago, University of Chicago Press.
Bowerman, M. (1988), ‘The no negative evidence’ problem: How do children avoid constructing an overly general grammar?’, in J. A. Hawkins, ed., Explaining Language Universals, New York: Basil Blackwell Inc., pp. 73–101.
Brown, R. and Hanlon, C. (1970), ‘Derivational complexity and order of acquisition of syntax’, in J. R. Hayes, ed., Cognition and the Development of Language, New York; Wiley, pp. 11–53.
Carroll, J. B. (1979), ‘Psychometric approaches to the study of language abilities’, Individual Differences in Language Ability and Language Behavior. C. J. Fillmore, D. Kempler and W. S.-Y. Wang. New York: Academic Press, pp. 13–31.
Cartmill, M. (1990), ‘Human uniqueness and theoretical content in paleoanthropology’. International Journal of Primatology (3), pp. 173–192.
Chomsky, N. (1972). Language and Mind, New York: Harcourt Brace Jovanovich, Inc.
Chomsky, N. (1980), ‘Rules and representations’, Behavioral and Brain Sciences 3, pp 1–61.
Chomsky, N. (1981), Lectures on Government and Binding, Dordrecht: Foris Publications.
Christianson, G. E. (1978), This Wild Abyss: The Story of the Men Who Made Modern Astronomy, New York: Free Press.
Crain, S. (1991), ‘Language acquisition in the absence of experience’, Behavioral and Brain Sciences 14, pp. 597–650.
Curtiss, S. (1977), Genie: A Psycholinguistic Study of a Modern-Day ‘Wild Child’, New York: Academic Press.
Damasio, A. R. and Damasio, H. (1992), ‘Brain and language’, Scientific American 267(3), pp. 89–95.
Darwin, C. (1859), The Origin of Species by Means of Natural Selection, London: John Murray.
Darwin, C. (1868), The Variation of Animals and Plants Under Domestication.
Dawkins, R. (1982), The Extended Phenotype: The Gene as the Unit of Selection, New York: Oxford University Press.
Dawkins, R. (1986), The Blind Watchmaker, New York: W. W. Norton & Company, Inc.
Deacon, T. W. (1997), The Symbolic Species: The Co-evolution of Language and the Brain, New York: W.W. Norton.
Ebbesson, S. O. E. (1984), ‘Evolution and ontogeny of neural circuits’, Behavioural and Brain Sciences 7, pp. 321–366.
Falk, D. (1987), ‘Hominid Paleoneurology’, Annual Review of Anthropology 16, pp. 13–30.
Ferguson, A. (1767), An Essay on the History of Civil Society. London.
Fetzer, J. H. (1988), ‘Signs and minds: An introduction to the theory of semiotic systems’, in J. H. Fetzer, ed., Aspects of Artificial Intelligence, Dordrecht, The Netherlands: Kluwer Academic Publishers, pp. 133–161.
Fodor, J. A. (1975), The Language of Thought, New York: Crowell.
Gardner, H. (1974), The Shattered Mind, New York: Vintage.
Gardner, R. A. and Gardner, B. T. (1984), ‘A vocabulary test for chimpanzee (Pan troglodytes)’, Journal of Comparative Psychology 98, pp. 381–404.
Gold, E.M. (1967), ‘Language identification in the limit?’, Information and Control 10, pp. 447–474.
Gopnik, M. and Crago, M. B. (1991), ‘Familial aggregation of a developmental language disorder’, Cognition 39, pp. 1–50.
Gordon, P. (1986), ‘Level-ordering in lexical development’, Cognition 21, pp. 73–93.
Haiman, J. (1985a), Natural Syntax: Iconicity and Erosion, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Haiman, J., ed. (1985b), Iconicity in Syntax, Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
Hayek, F. A. (1973), Law, Legislation and Liberty, Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
Herrnstein, R. J. (1979), ‘Acquisition, generalization, and discrimination reversal of a natural concept’, Journal of Experimental Psychology 5, pp. 116–129.
Hopper, P. (1987), ‘Emergent Grammar’, Proceedings of the Berkeley Linguistics Society 13, pp. 139–157.
Hopper, P. J. and Traugott, E. C. (1993), Grammaticalization, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Jacob, F. (1977), ‘Evolution and tinkering’, Science 196, pp. 1161–1166.
Jerison, H. J. (1973), Evolution of the Brain and Intelligence, New York: Academic Press.
Jerison, H. J. (1985), ‘Animal intelligence as encephalization’, Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society of London, Series B 308, 21–35.
Karmiloff-Smith, A., Tyler, L. K., Voice, K., Sims, K., Udwin, O., Howlin, P. and Davies, M. (1998), ‘Linguistic dissociations in Williams syndrome: evaluating receptive syntax in on-line and offline tasks’, Neuropsychologia 36(4), 343–51.
Kiparsky, P. (1982), ‘Lexical phonology and morphology’, in I. S. Yang, ed., Linguistics in the Morning Calm, Seoul: Hansin.
Langacker, R. W. (1987), Foundations of Cognitive Grammar, Stanford: Stanford University Press.
Lashley, K. S. (1951), ‘The problem of serial order in behavior’, Cerebral Mechanisms in Behavior. L. A. Jeffress. New York: John Wiley and Sons, Inc., pp. 112–136.
Lenneberg, E. H. (1967), Biological Foundations of Language, New York: John Wiley & Sons, Inc.
Lieberman, P. (1984), The Biology and Evolution of Language, Cambridge, Massachusetts: Harvard University Press.
Lovejoy, C. O. (1988), ‘Evolution of Human Walking’, Scientific American (November): 118–125.
Markman, E. M. (1987), ‘How children constrain the possible meanings of words?’ in U. Neisser, ed., Concepts and Conceptual Development: Ecological and Intellectual Factors in Categorization, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Mayr, E. (1978), ‘Evolution’, Scientific American 239, pp. 47–55.
McNeill, D. (1966), ‘Developmental psycholinguistics’, in F. Smith and G. Miller, eds., The Genesis of Language: A Psycholinguistic Approach, Cambridge, MA: MIT Press, pp. 15–84.
Miller, G. A. and Gildea, P. M. (1991), ‘How children learn words’, in The Emergence of Language: Development and Evolution. W. S.-Y. Wang, ed., New York: W. H. Freeman, pp. 150–158.
O'Grady, W. (1987), Principles of Grammar & Learning, Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
Ogura, M. (1993), ‘The development of periphrastic do in English: A case of lexical diffusion in syntax’, Diachronica 10(1), pp. 51–85.
Pepperberg, I. M. (1990), ‘Conceptual abilities of some nonprimate species, with an emphasis on an African Grey parrot’, in S.T. Parker and K.R. Gibson, eds., ‘Language’ and Intelligence in Monkeys and Apes: Comparative Developmental Perspectives, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, pp. 469–507.
Pinker, S. (1994), The Language Instinct: How the Mind Creates Language, New York: Harper Collins Publishers, Inc.
Pinker, S. and P. Bloom (1990), ‘Natural language and natural selection’, Behavioral and Brain Sciences 13(4), pp. 707–784.
Premack, A. J. and Premack, D. (1972), ‘Teaching language to an ape’, Scientific American (October), pp. 92–99.
Regier, T. (1996), The Human Semantic Potential: Spatial Language and Constrained Connectionism, Cambridge, Massachusetts: MIT Press.
Ringo, J. L. (1991), ‘Neuronal interconnection as a function of brain size’, Brain Behavior and Evolution 38, pp. 1–6.
Ross, J. R. (1979), ‘Where's English?’, in C. J. Fillmore, D. Kempler and W. S.-Y. Wang, eds., Individual Differences in Language Ability and Language Behavior, New York: Academic Press, pp. 127–163.
Sampson, G. (1978), ‘Linguistic universals as evidence for empiricism’, Journal of Linguistics 14, pp. 183–206.
Sampson, G. (1979), ‘A non-nativist account of language universals’, Linguistics and Philosophy 3, pp. 99–104.
Sampson, G. (1980), Making Sense, Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Sampson, G. (1997), Educating Eve: The ‘Language Instinct’ Debate, London: Cassell.
Savage-Rumbaugh, S. (1988), ‘A new look at ape language: Comprehension of vocal speech and syntax’, in D.W. Leger, ed., Comparative Perspectives in Modern Psychology, Lincoln: University of Nebraska Press, pp. 201–255.
Savage-Rumbaugh, E. S., Murphy, J., Sevcik, R. A., Brakke, K. E., Williams, S. L. and Rumbaugh, D. M. (1993), ‘Language comprehension in ape and child’, Monographs of the Society for Research in Child Develonment 58(3–4), pp. 1–222.
Savage-Rumbaugh, E. S. and Rumbaugh, D. M. (1993), ‘The emergence of language’, in K.R. Gibson and T. Ingold, eds., Tools, Language and Cognition in Human Evolution, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, pp. 86–108.
Schoenemann, P. T. (1997), An MRI Study of the Relationship Between Human Neuroanatomy and Behavioral Ability, Unpublished dissertation. University of California, Berkeley.
Schoenemann, P. T. and Wang, W. S.-Y. (1996), ‘Evolutionary principles and the emergence of syntax’, Behavioral and Brain Sciences 19(4), pp. 646–647.
Seyfarth, R. M., Cheney, D. L. and Marler, P. (1980), ‘Vervet monkey alarm calls: Semantic communication in a free-ranging primate’, Animal Behavior 28, pp. 1070–1094.
Simon, H. (1962), ‘The architecture of complexity’, Proceedings of the American Philosophical Society 106, pp. 467–482.
Smith, B. H. (1990), ‘The cost of a large brain’, Behavioral and Brain Sciences 13, pp. 365–366.
Snowdon, C. T. (1990), ‘Language capacities of nonhuman animals’, Yearbook of Physical Anthropology 33, pp. 215–243.
Steele, S. (1978), ‘Word order variation: A typological study’, in J.H. Greenberg, ed., Universals of Human Language: Syntax, Stanford: Stanford University Press, pp. 585–623.
Traugott. E. C. (1972), A History of English Syntax, New York: Holt, Rinehart and Winston.
Vargha-Khadem, F., Watkins, K., Alcock, K., Fletcher, P. and Passingham, R. (1995), ‘Praxic and nonverbal cognitive deficits in a large family with a genetically transmitted speech and language disorder’, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences. U.S.A. 92, pp. 930–933.
Visalberghi, E. and Fragaszy, D.M. (1990), ‘Do monkeys ape?’, in S. T. Parker and K. R. Gibson, ed., ‘Language’ and Intelligence in Monkeys and Apes: Comparative Developmental Perspectives, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, pp. 247–273.
Wang, W. S.-Y. (1984), ‘Organum ex machina?’, Behavioral and Brain Sciences 7(2), pp. 210–211.
Wang, W. S.-Y. (1991a), ‘Language prefabs and habitual thought’, in W. S.-Y. Wang, ed., Explorations in Language, Taipei, Taiwan: Pyramid Press, pp. 397–412
Wang, W. S.-Y. (1991b), Explorations in Language, Taipei: Pyramid Press.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Thomas Schoenemann, P. Syntax as an Emergent Characteristic of the Evolution of Semantic Complexity. Minds and Machines 9, 309–346 (1999). https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1008360020568
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1008360020568