Abstract
Function and teleology can be naturalized either by reference to systems with a particular type of organization (organizational views) or by reference to a particular kind of history (etiological views). As functions are generally ascribed to states or traits according to their current role and regardless of their origin, etiological accounts are inappropriate. Here, I offer a systems-theoretical interpretation as a new version of an organizational account of functionality, which is more comprehensive than traditional cybernetic views and provides explicit criteria for empirically testable function ascriptions. I propose, that functional states, traits or items are those components of a complex system, which are under certain circumstances necessary for their self-re-production. I show, how this notion can be applied in intra- and trans-generational function ascriptions in biology, how it can deal with the problems of multifunctionality and functional equivalents, and how it relates to concepts like fitness and adaptation. Finally, I argue that most intentional explanations can be treated as functional explanations
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Similar content being viewed by others
REFERENCES
Amundson, R. and G. V. Lauder: 1994, ‘Function without Purpose: The Uses of Causal Role Function in Evolutionary Biology’, Biology and Philosophy 9, 443–469.
Ayala, F.: 1977, ‘Teleological Explanations’, reprinted in: M. Ruse (ed.), 1989, Philosophy of Biology, Macmillan, New York, pp. 187–192. (Orig.: 1977).
Bekoff, M. and C. Allen: 1995, ‘Teleology, Function, Design and the Evolution of Animal Behaviour’, Trends in Ecology and Evolution 10, 253–255.
Bigelow, J. and R. Pargetter: 1987, ‘Functions’, Journal of Philosophy 84, 181–196.
Bock, W. J.: 1980, ‘The Definition and Recognition of Biological Adaptation’, American Zoologist 20, 217–227.
Bock, W. J. and G. von Wahlert: 1965, ‘Adaptation and the Form-Function Complex’ Evolution 19, 269–299.
Boorse, C.: 1976, ‘Wright on Functions’, The Philosophical Review 85, 70–86.
Braithwaite, R.: 1960, Scientific Explanation, Harper, New York.
Chambon, P.: 1993, ‘The Molecular and Genetic Dissection of the Retinoid Signalling Pathway’, Gene 135, 223–228.
Christensen, W.: 1996, ‘A Complex Systems Theory of Teleology’, Biology and Philosophy 11, 301–320.
Coveney, P. and R. Highfield: 1995, Frontiers of Complexity, Fawcett Columbine, New York.
Cummins, R.: 1975, ‘Functional Analysis’, Journal of Philosophy 72, 741–765.
Cummins, R.: 1983, The Nature of Psychological Explanation, MIT Press, Cambridge.
Ehring, D.: 1985, ‘Dispositions and Functions: Cummins on Functional Analysis’, Erkenntnis 23, 243–249.
Eigen, M., W. Gardiner, P. Schuster and R. Winkler-Oswatitsch: 1981, ‘The Origin of Genetic Information’, Scientific American 244/4, 88–118.
Fietz, M. J., J.-P. Concordet, R. Barbosa, R. Johnson, S. Krauss, A. P. McMahon, C. Tabin and P. W. Ingham: 1994, ‘The Hedgehog Gene Family in Drosophila and Vertebrate Development’, Development 1994Suppl. 43–51.
Godfrey-Smith, P.: 1994, ‘A Modern History Theory of Functions’, Nous 28, 355–362.
Goldstein, L. J.: 1962, ‘Recurrent Structures and Teleology’, Inquiry 5, 5–11.
Gould, S. J.: 1980, ‘Is a New and General Theory of Evolution Emerging?’, Paleobiology 6, 119–130.
Gould, S. J. and R. C. Lewontin: 1979, ‘The Spandrels of San Marco and the Panglossian Paradigm’, Proceedings of the Royal Society London B 205 (1979), 581–589.
Gould, S. J. and E. S. Vrba: 1982, ‘Exaptation — A Missing Term in the Science of Form’, Paleobiology 8, 4–15.
Griffiths, P. E.: 1993, ‘Functional Analysis and Proper Functions’, British Journal for the Philosophy of Science 44, 409–422.
Hausman, D. B.: 1985, ‘The Explanation of Goal-Directed Behavior’, Synthese 65, 327–346.
Hempel, C. G.: 1959, ‘Functional Analysis’, reprinted in: C. G. Hempel, 1965, Aspects of Scientific Explanation and Other Essays in the Philosophy of Science, The Free Press, New York, 279–330.
Horan, B. L.: 1989, ‘Functional Explanations in Sociobiology’, Biology and Philosophy 4, 131–234.
Kitcher, P.: 1993, ‘Function and Design’, in: P. A. French, T. E. Uehling, Jr. and H. K. Wettstein (eds.), Midwest Studies in Philosophy 18, University of Notre Dame Press, Notre Dame, pp. 379–397.
Lauder, G. V., A. M. Levoi and M. R. Rose: 1993, ‘Adaptations and History’, Trends in Ecology and Evolution 8, 294–297.
Lewontin, R. C.: 1978, ‘Adaptation’, Scientific American 239/3, 212–230.
Manning, R. N.: 1997, ‘Biological Function, Selection, and Reduction’, British Journal for the Philosophy of Science 48, 69–82.
Maynard Smith, J.: 1983, ‘Evolution and Development’, in: B. C. Goodwin, N. Holder and L. C. Wylie (eds.): Development and Evolution, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, p. 33–45.
Mayr, E.: 1988, Toward a New Philosophy of Biology, Harvard University Press, Cambridge.
Millikan, R. G.: 1984, Language, Thought and Other Biological Categories, MIT Press, Cambridge.
Millikan, R G.: 1989, ‘In Defense of Proper Functions’, Philosophy of Science 56, 288–302.
Mitchell, S. D.: 1995, ‘Function, Fitness and Disposition’, Biology and Philosophy 10, 39–54.
Nagel, E.: 1961, The Structure of Science. Problems in the Logic of Scientific Explanation, Routledge and Kegan Paul, London.
Nagel, E.: 1979, ‘Teleology Revisited’, Journal of Philosophy 74, 261–301.
Neander, K.: 1991a, ‘Functions as Selected Affects: The Conceptual Analyst's Defense’, Philosophy of Sciences 8, 168–184.
Neander, K.: 1991b, ‘The Teleological Notion of Function’, Australasian Journal of Philosophy 69, 454–468.
Pettit, P.: 1996, ‘Functional Explanation and Virtual Selection’, British Journal for the Philosophy of Science 47, 291–302.
Reeve, H. K. and P. W. Sherman: 1993, ‘Adaptation and the Goals of Evolutionary Research’, The Quarterly Review of Biology 68, 1–32.
Ridley, M.: 1993, Evolution, Blackwell Scientific Publications, Boston.
Rosenberg, A.: 1985, The Structure of Biological Science, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.
Rosenblueth, A., N. Wiener and J. Bigelow: 1943, ‘Behavior, Purpose and Teleology’, Philosophy of Science 10, 18–24.
Ruse, M.: 1973, The Philosophy of Biology, Hutchinson, London.
Schaffner, K. F.: 1993, Discovery and Explanation in Biology and Medicine, University of Chicago Press, Chicago.
Schlosser, G.: 1993, Einheit der Welt und Einheitswissenschaft. Grundlegung einer Allgemeinen Systemtheorie, Vieweg, Braunschweig/Wiesbaden.
Schlosser, G.: 1996, ‘Der Organismus — eine Fiktion?’, in: H. J. Rheinberger and M. Weingarten (eds.), Jahrbuch für Geschichte und Theorie der Biologie III, Verlag für Wissenschaft und Bildung, Berlin, pp. 75–92.
Sober, E.: 1984, The Nature of Selection, MIT Press, Cambridge.
Sober, E.: 1993, Philosophy of Biology, Oxford University Press, Oxford.
Stegmüller, W.: 1969, Wissenschaftliche Erklärung und Begründung. Probleme und Resultate der Wissenschaftstheorie und analytischen Philosophie 1, Springer, Berlin.
Tautz, D.: 1992, ‘Redundancies, Development and the Flow of Information’, BioEssays 14, 263–266.
Sommerhoff, G.: 1950, Analytical Biology, Oxford University Press, London.
Walsh, D. M.: 1996, ‘Fitness and Function’, British Journal for the Philosophy of Science 47, 553–574.
Wimsatt, W. C.: 1972, ‘Teleology and the Logical Structure of Function Statements’, Studies in the History and Philosophy of Science 3, 1–80.
Wright, L.: 1972, ‘Explanation and Teleology’, Philosophy of Science 39, 204–218.
Wright, L.: 1976, Teleological Explanations, University of California Press, Berkeley.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Schlosser, G. Self-re-Production and Functionality. Synthese 116, 303–354 (1998). https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1005073307193
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1005073307193