Summary
It is here shown that the relativistic doctrine of the relativity of simultaneity is untenable and that both the special and general theories of relativity are inconsistent. It is also shown that the theories can perhaps be made consistent, but excessively weak, through the reintroduction of absolute space and a weakening of the Lorentz transformations. Non-relativistic hypotheses for some events thought to require relativity are suggested. Finally, some conjectures are made on how so wrong a theory could have been accepted by so many for so long.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Davies, P., “Why pick on Einstein?”,New Scientist, vol. 87, 1980.
Feynman, R.,The Feynman Lecures On Physics, vol. 1, Reading (Mass.), 1963.
Golling, O., “The principle of relativity”, in Sapper, K., ed.,Kritik und Fortbildung der Relativitätstheorie, Graz, 1957.
Møller, C.,The Theory of Relativity, Oxford, 1952.
Nordenson, H.,Relativity, Time and Reality, London, 1969.
Sugar, A., “A logical requiem for relativity” (abstract),J. of Symb. Logic, vol. 36, 1971, p. 582.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Schock, R. The inconsistency of the theory of relativity. Zeitschrift für Allgemeine Wissenschaftstheorie 12, 285–296 (1981). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01801199
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01801199