Abstract
Solidarity as a social phenomenon means a sharing of feelings, interests, risks and responsibilities. The Western-European Welfare State can be seen as an organized system of solidarity, historically grown from group solidarity among workers, later between workers and employers, moving towards solidarity between larger social groups: between healthy people and the sick, between the young and the elderly, between the employed and the unemployed. This sharing of risks at a societal level however, has revealed the risks of sharing. In the postwar development of the welfare state, solidarity has been organized mainly in administrative forms, run by anonymous bureaucracies and giving way to free riders and calculative citizens. This article describes this development and provides arguments for a reorientation of the welfare state and for the re-allocation of rights, risks and responsibilities.
Similar content being viewed by others
REFERENCES
Dahrendorf, R., Law and Order. London: Stevens, 1985.
Dahrendorf, R., The Modern Social Conflict.London: Routledge, 1988.
Gilbert, N., Welfare Justice, restoring social equity.London: Yale University Press, 1995.
Johnson, W., Muddling towards Frugality.San Francisco: Sierra Club Books, 1978.
Nozick, R., Anarchy, State and Utopia.London: Blackwell, 1983.
Schuyt, K., Law, Order and Civil Disobedience. Rotterdam: Rotterdam University Press, 1972.
Walzer, M., Spheres of Justice.Oxford: Martin Robertson, 1983.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Schuyt, K. The Sharing of Risks and the Risks of Sharing: Solidarity and Social Justice in the Welfare State. Ethical Theory and Moral Practice 1, 297–311 (1998). https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1009907329351
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1009907329351