Hostname: page-component-76fb5796d-25wd4 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-04-25T15:28:42.064Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

The Viability of the Philosophical Novel: The Case of Simone de Beauvoir's She Came to Stay

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  25 March 2020

Abstract

This article begins by asking if the project to write a philosophical novel is not inherently flawed; it would seem that the novelist must either write an ambiguous text, which would not create a strong enough argument to count as philosophy, or she must write a text with a clear argument, which would not be ambiguous enough to count as good fiction. The only other option available would be to exemplify a preexisting abstract philosophical system in the concrete literary world. To move beyond such an impasse, this article turns to the work of Simone de Beauvoir. Beauvoir's unique aesthetic theory in “Literature and Metaphysics” envisions philosophy as an integral part of the literary text and sees the novel not as an argument but as something called a “philosophical appeal” (Beauvoir 2004b). In her first novel, She Came to Stay, such a concept of the philosophical novel allows Beauvoir to make an original contribution to the philosophical tradition—one in which Beauvoir rethinks the problem of solipsism—while still creating a stunning literary work (Beauvoir 1954). A study of the theory and the novel together thus provides a solid understanding of what philosophers stand to gain from the philosophical novel.

Type
Articles
Copyright
Copyright © 2012 by Hypatia, Inc.

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Arp, Kristana. 2001. The bonds of freedom: Simone de Beauvoir's existentialist ethics. Chicago: Open Court.Google Scholar
Barnes, Hazel E. 1961. The literature of possibility: A study in humanistic existentialism. London: Tavistock.Google Scholar
Bauer, Nancy. 2001. Simone de Beauvoir, philosophy, and feminism. New York: Columbia University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bauer, Nancy. 2004. Must we read Simone de Beauvoir? In The legacy of Simone de Beauvoir, ed. Grosholz, Emily R.Oxford: Clarendon.Google Scholar
Beauvoir, Simone de. 1943. L'invitée. Paris: Gallimard.Google Scholar
Beauvoir, Simone de. 1948. The ethics of ambiguity. Trans. Bernard Frechtman. New York: Philosophical Library.Google Scholar
Beauvoir, Simone de. 1953. The second sex. Trans. and ed. H. M. Parshley. New York: Knopf.Google Scholar
Beauvoir, Simone de. 1954. She came to stay. Trans. Yvonne Moyse and Roger Senhouse. New York: Norton.Google Scholar
Beauvoir, Simone de. 2004a. Existentialism and popular wisdom. Trans. Marybeth Timmermann. In Simone de Beauvoir: Philosophical writings, ed. Simons, Margaret A.Urbana: University of Illinois Press.Google Scholar
Beauvoir, Simone de. 2004b. Literature and metaphysics. Trans. Veronique Zaytzeff and Frederick M. Morrison. In Simone de Beauvoir: Philosophical writings, ed. Simons, Margaret A.Urbana: University of Illinois Press.Google Scholar
Beauvoir, Simone de. 2004c. Pyrrhus and Cineas. Trans. Marybeth Timmermann. In Simone de Beauvoir: Philosophical writings, ed. Simons, Margaret A.Urbana: University of Illinois Press.Google Scholar
Descartes, René. 2008. Meditations on first philosophy. Trans. Michael Moriarty. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Fullbrook, Edward. 2006. She Came to Stay and Being and Nothingness. In Simone de Beauvoir: Philosophical writings, ed. Simons, Margaret A.Urbana: University of Illinois Press.Google Scholar
Fullbrook, Kate, and Fullbrook, Edward. 1994. Simone de Beauvoir and Jean‐Paul Sartre: The remaking of a twentieth century legend. New York: Basic Books.Google Scholar
Fullbrook, Kate, and Fullbrook, Edward. 1995. Sartre's secret key. In Simone de Beauvoir: Philosophical writings, ed. Simons, Margaret A.Urbana: University of Illinois Press.Google Scholar
Fullbrook, Kate, and Fullbrook, Edward. 1999. The absence of Beauvoir. In Feminist interpretations of Jean‐Paul Sartre, ed. Murphy, Julien S.University Park: Pennsylvania State University Press.Google Scholar
Fullbrook, Kate, and Fullbrook, Edward. 2001. Beauvoir and Plato: The clinic and the cave. In The existential phenomenology of Simone de Beauvoir, ed. O'Brien, Wendy and Embree, Lester. Dordrecht: Kluwer Academic.Google Scholar
Gothlin, Eva. 2006. Beauvoir and Sartre on appeal, desire, and ambiguity. In The philosophy of Simone de Beauvoir: Critical essays, ed. Simons, Margaret A.Bloomington: Indiana University Press.Google Scholar
Gothlin, Eva.See also Lundgren‐Gothlin, Eva.Google Scholar
Heinämaa, Sara. 2003. Toward a phenomenology of sexual difference: Husserl, Merleau‐Ponty, Beauvoir. New York: Rowman and Littlefield.Google Scholar
Holveck, Eleanore. 2002. Simone de Beauvoir's philosophy of lived experience: Literature and metaphysics. Lanham, Md.: Rowman and Littlefield.Google Scholar
Kleppner, Amy M. 1964. Philosophy and the literary medium: The existentialist predicament. Journal of Aesthetics and Art Criticism 23(2): 207–17.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kruks, Sonia. 1995. Simone de Beauvoir: Teaching Sartre about freedom. In Feminist interpretations of Simone de Beauvoir, ed. Simons, Margaret A.University Park: Pennsylvania State University Press.Google Scholar
Le Dœuff, Michèle. 2007. Hipparchia's choice: An essay concerning women, philosophy, etc. Trans. Trista Selous. New York: Columbia University Press.Google Scholar
Lundgren‐Gothlin, Eva. 1996. Sex and existence: Simone de Beauvoir's The Second Sex. Trans. Linda Schenck. Hanover, N.H.: Wesleyan University Press.Google Scholar
Lundgren‐Gothlin, Eva.See also Gothlin, Eva.Google Scholar
Merleau‐Ponty, Maurice. 1964. Metaphysics and the novel. In Sense and non‐sense. Trans. Hubert L. Dreyfus and Patricia Allen Dreyfus. Chicago: Northwestern University Press.Google Scholar
Moi, Toril. 2008. Simone de Beauvoir: The making of an intellectual woman. 2nd ed. Oxford: Blackwell.Google Scholar
O'Brien, Wendy, and Embree, Lester, eds. 2001. The existential phenomenology of Simone de Beauvoir. Dordrecht: Kluwer Academic.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sartre, Jean‐Paul. 1947. Morts sans sepulture. Paris: Gallimard.Google Scholar
Sartre, Jean‐Paul. 1956. Being and nothingness. Trans. Hazel E. Barnes. New York: Gramercy Books.Google Scholar
Sartre, Jean‐Paul. 1965. Contribution to Que peut la littérature? In Que peut la littérature?, ed. Buin, Yves. Paris: Union Générale d'Éditions.Google Scholar
Sartre, Jean‐Paul. 1988. What is Literature? In “What is Literature?” and other essays, trans. Bernard Frechtman. Cambridge, Mass.: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Simons, Margaret A. 2001. The beginnings of Beauvoir's existential phenomenology. In The existential phenomenology of Simone de Beauvoir, ed. O'Brien, Wendy and Embree, Lester. Dordrecht: Kluwer Academic.Google Scholar
Simons, Margaret A. 2003. Bergson's influence on Beauvoir's philosophical methodology. In The Cambridge companion to Simone de Beauvoir, ed. Card, Claudia. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Simons, Margaret A. 2008. Du solipsisme à la solidarité: La philosophie de guerre de Beauvoir. In (Re)découvrir l'œuvre de Simone de Beauvoir: Du “Deuxième sexe”à“La cérémonie des adieux,” ed. Kristeva, Juliaet al. Paris: Le bord de l'eau.Google Scholar
Sirridge, Mary. 2003. Philosophy in Beauvoir's fiction. In The Cambridge companion to Simone de Beauvoir, ed. Card, Claudia. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Sokolowski, Robert. 2000. Introduction to phenomenology. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Suleiman, Susan Rubin. 1983. Authoritarian fictions: The ideological novel as a literary genre. Princeton: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Weiss, Gail. 2006. Challenging choices: An ethic of oppression. In The philosophy of Simone de Beauvoir: Critical essays, ed. Simons, Margaret. Bloomington: Indiana University Press.Google Scholar