Hostname: page-component-8448b6f56d-gtxcr Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-04-18T04:11:56.242Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Return of the Great Pumpkin

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  10 January 2014

KYLE SCOTT
KYLE SCOTT*
Affiliation:
Department of Philosophy, University of Edinburgh, Edinburgh, EH8 9AD, UK e-mail: kyle.scott@ed.ac.uk
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

According to Alvin Plantinga there is no good reason to think that there is anything unacceptable about religious belief even if the believer cannot present evidence or arguments in support of her beliefs. One important challenge to this claim is the ‘Great Pumpkin’ objection. This objection is that Plantinga's arguments could be used to defend very strange beliefs such as belief in the Great Pumpkin. I describe this objection in more detail and then offer a solution to the problem by considering how the historical and social environment might provide favouring evidence for Christian beliefs.

Type
Articles
Information
Religious Studies , Volume 50 , Issue 3 , September 2014 , pp. 297 - 308
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 2014 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

DeRose, Keith (unpublished manuscript) ‘Voodoo epistemology’, <http://www.calvin.edu/academic/philosophy/virtual_library/articles/derose_keith/voodoo_epistemology.pdf>..>Google Scholar
Plantinga, Alvin (1983) ‘Reason and belief in God’, in Plantinga, Alvin & Wolterstorff, Nicholas (eds) Faith and Rationality (Notre Dame IN: University of Notre Dame Press), 16–93.Google Scholar
Plantinga, Alvin (2000) Warranted Christian Belief (Oxford: Oxford University Press).Google Scholar
Plantinga, Alvin (2002) ‘Reply’, Philosophical Books, 2, 124–135.Google Scholar
Pritchard, Duncan (2010) ‘Relevant alternatives, perceptual knowledge and discrimination’, Nous, 44, 245–268.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Zagzebski, Linda (2002) ‘Plantinga's warranted Christian belief and the Aquinas/Calvin Model’, Philosophical Books, 2, 117–123.Google Scholar