Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

The Magic Bullet Criticism of Agricultural Biotechnology

  • Published:
Journal of Agricultural and Environmental Ethics Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

One common method of criticizing genetically modified organisms (GMOs) is to label them as “magic bullets.” However, this criticism, like many in the debate over GMOs, is not very clear. What exactly is the “magic bullet criticism”? What are its origins? What flaw is it pointing out in GM crops and agricultural biotechnology? What is the scope of the criticism? Does it apply to all GMOs, or just some? Does it point to a fatal flaw, or something that can be fixed? The goal of this paper is to answer these questions and clarify the magic bullet criticism of agricultural biotechnology. It is hoped that the results of this exercise will be helpful in advancing deliberation over the role GMOs and agricultural biotechnology should play in 21st century agriculture.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • M. Alteiri (2000) Food First Special Report No. 1. Genetic Engineering in Agriculture: The Myths, Environmental Risks, and Alternatives Food First/Institute for Food and Development Policy Oakland CA

    Google Scholar 

  • Benbrock, C., “Do GM crops mean less pesticide use?” Pesticide Outlook. October 2001.

  • D. Charles (2001) Lords of the Harvest: Biotech, Big Money, and the Future of Food Perseus Publishing Cambridge, MA

    Google Scholar 

  • R. Dubos (1993) Mirage of Health: Utopias, Progress, and Biological Change Rutgers University Press Rutgers, NJ

    Google Scholar 

  • S. Krimsky R. Wrubel (1996) Agricultural Biotechnology and the Environment University of Illinois Press Urbana, IL

    Google Scholar 

  • T. Kuhn (1970) The Structure of Scientific Revolutions, Second Edition University of Chicago Press Chicago

    Google Scholar 

  • L. Nordenfelt I. Lindhal (1984) Health, Disease, and Causal Explanation in Medicine D. Reidel Publishing Co Boston

    Google Scholar 

  • S. Norell (1984) “Models of Causation in Epidemiology” L. Nordenfelt I. Lindahls (Eds) Health, Disease, and Causal Explanation in Medicine D. Reidel Publishing Co Boston

    Google Scholar 

  • Schuman, A. J., “A Concise History of Antimicrobial Therapy.” Contemporary Pediatrics (October 2003), 65–85.

  • P. Thompson (1995) The Spirit of the Soil: Agriculture and Environmental Ethics Routledge London

    Google Scholar 

  • University of California, integrated pest management. Web site: http://www.ipm.usdavis.edu/ (accessed 1/15/04).

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Dane Scott.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Scott, D. The Magic Bullet Criticism of Agricultural Biotechnology. J Agric Environ Ethics 18, 259–267 (2005). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10806-005-0632-4

Download citation

  • Accepted:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10806-005-0632-4

Keywords

Navigation