Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Ethical Consumption and New Business Models in the Food Industry. Evidence from the Eataly Case

  • Published:
Journal of Business Ethics Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Individual and collective ethical stances regarding ethical consumption and related outcomes are usually seen as both a form of concern about extant market offerings and as opportunities to develop new offerings. In this sense, demand and supply are traditionally portrayed as interacting dialectically on the basis of extant business models. In general, this perspective implicitly assumes the juxtaposition of demand side ethical stances and supply side corporate initiatives. The Eataly story describes, however, a different approach to market transformation; in this case a company and a social movement (Slow Food) have negotiated and collaborated prior to initiating a new business model. This collaboration process and its outcomes are described, focusing specifically on ordinary Eataly customers’ and Slow Food members’ reactions. Given that Eataly can be regarded as a case of mainstreaming, ordinary customers seem satisfied with the new offering and the Slow Food support for the initiative; the more purist members of the Slow Food movement had critical concerns, however, as happened in similar conditions, according to literature, with regard to Fair Trade. The Slow Food endorsement of the new venture has also been observed from the attitude–behaviour gap perspective, as it contributed to addressing the factors affecting the gap between attitudes and actual behaviours. Extensive qualitative data were collected and analysed over a 3-year period. The main study implications refer to the ways in which companies and social movements could interact to co-design new business models, as well as outlining consumers’ attitudes and behaviours towards such new offerings.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

Notes

  1. The Kilometri Zero philosophy means preferring goods locally produced and fresh and seasonal produce. This prevents goods travelling far from the points of sale, since their transport and handling cause pollution and environmental damage.

References

  • Adams, C. A., & Zutshi, A. (2005). Corporate disclosure and auditing. In R. Harrison, T. Newholm, & D. Shaw (Eds.), The ethical consumer (pp. 207–217). London: Sage.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Alexander, A., & Nicholls, A. (2006). Rediscovering consumer-producer involvement: A network perspective on fair trade marketing. European Journal of Marketing, 40(11), 1236–1253.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Arnould, E. J., & Price, L. L. (2000). Authenticating acts and authoritative performances: Questing for self and community. In D. G. Mick, S. Ratneshwar, & C. Huffman (Eds.), The why of consumption: Contemporary perspectives on consumer motives, goals and desires (pp. 140–163). London: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Auger, P., & Devinney, T. (2007). ‘Do what consumers say matter? The misalignment of preferences with unconstrained ethical intentions’. Journal of Business Ethics, 76(4), 361–383.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ballantine, P. W., & Creery, S. (2010). The consumption and disposition behaviour of voluntary simplifiers. Journal of Consumer Behaviour, 9(1), 45–56.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Barnett, C., Cafaro, P., & Newholm, T. (2005). Philosophy and ethical consumption. In R. Harrison, T. Newholm, & D. Shaw (Eds.), The ethical consumer (pp. 11–24). London: Sage.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Bekin, C., Carrigan, M., & Szmigin, I. (2005). Defying marketing sovereignty: Voluntary simplicity at new consumption communities. Qualitative Market Research: An International Journal, 8(4), 413–429.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Belk, R. W., Devinney, T., & Eckhardt, G. (2005). Consumer ethics across cultures. Consumption, Markets & Culture, 8(3), 275–289.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bezençon, V., & Blili, S. (2009). Fair trade managerial practices: Strategy, organisation and engagement. Journal of Business Ethics, 90(1), 95–113.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bezençon, V., & Blili, S. (2010). Ethical products and consumer involvement: What’s new? European Journal of Marketing, 44(9–10), 1305–1321.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Boulstridge, E., & Carrigan, M. (2000). ‘Do consumers really care about corporate responsibility? Highlighting the attitude-behaviour gap’. Journal of Communication Management, 4(4), 355–368.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bray, J., Johns, N., & Kilburn, D. (2011). An exploratory study into the factors impeding ethical consumption. Journal of Business Ethics, 98(4), 597–608.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Buechler, S. M. (2010). Understanding social movements: Theories from the classical era to the present. Boulder, CO: Paradigm Publishers.

    Google Scholar 

  • Carrigan, M., & Attalla, A. (2001). The myth of the ethical consumer—Do ethics matter in purchase behaviour? Journal of Consumer Marketing, 18(7), 560–577.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Carrigan, M., Moraes, C., & Leek, S. (2011). Fostering responsible communities: A community social marketing approach to sustainable living. Journal of Business Ethics, 100(3), 515–534.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Carrigan, M., Szmigin, I., & Wright, J. (2004). ‘Shopping for a better world? An interpretive study of the potential for ethical consumption within the older market’. Journal of Consumer Marketing, 21(6), 401–417.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Carrington, M., Neville, B., & Whitwell, G. (2010). Why ethical consumers don’t walk their talk: Towards a framework for understanding the gap between the ethical purchase intentions and actual buying behaviour of ethically minded consumers. Journal of Business Ethics, 97(1), 139–158.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Castaldo, S., Perrini, F., Misani, N., & Tencati, A. (2009). The missing link between corporate social responsibility and consumer trust: The case of fair trade products. Journal of Business Ethics, 84(1), 1–15.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cherrier, H. (2005). Modelling consumer decision making in fair trade. In R. Harrison, T. Newholm, & D. Shaw (Eds.), The ethical consumer (pp. 137–154). London: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cherrier, H. (2009). Disposal and simple living: Exploring the circulation of goods and the development of sacred consumption. Journal of Consumer Behaviour, 8(6), 327–339.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Clouder, S., & Harrison, R. (2005). The effectiveness of ethical consumer behaviour. In R. Harrison, T. Newholm, & D. Shaw (Eds.), The ethical consumer (pp. 89–106). London: Sage.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Connolly, J., & Shaw, D. (2006). Identifying fair trade in consumption choice. Journal of Strategic Marketing, 14(4), 353–368.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cova, B., Kozinets, R. V., & Shankar, A. (Eds.). (2007). Consumer tribes. Oxford and Burlington, MA: Butterworth-Heinemann.

    Google Scholar 

  • Crane, A. (2001). Unpacking the ethical product. Journal of Business Ethics, 30(4), 361–373.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Crane, A. (2005). Meeting the ethical gaze: Challenges for orienting to the ethical market. In R. Harrison, T. Newholm, & D. Shaw (Eds.), The ethical consumer (pp. 219–232). London: Sage.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Dalli, D., & Corciolani, M. (2008). Collective forms of resistance: The transformative power of moderate communities. International Journal of Market Research, 50(6), 757–775.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Davies, I., & Ryals, L. (2010). The role of social capital in the success of fair trade. Journal of Business Ethics, 96(2), 317–338.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Davis, D. F., Golicic, S. L., & Boerstler, C. N. (2011). Benefits and challenges of conducting multiple methods research in marketing. Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, 39(3), 467–479.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • de Bakker, F. G. A., & den Hond, F. (2007). Activist groups tactics to influence companies. In C. Wankel (Ed.), 21st century management: A reference handbook (pp. 927–937). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • De Pelsmacker, P., Driesen, L., & Rayp, G. (2005). Do consumers care about ethics? Willingness to pay for fair-trade coffee. Journal of Consumer Affairs, 39(2), 363–385.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • den Hond, F., & de Bakker, F. G. A. (2007). Ideologically motivated activism: How activist groups influence corporate social change activities. Academy of Management Review, 32(3), 901–924.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Denegri-Knott, J., Zwick, D., & Schroeder, J. E. (2006). Mapping consumer power: An integrative framework for marketing and consumer research. European Journal of Marketing, 40(9–10), 950–971.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Desmond, J., McDonald, P., & O’Donohoe, S. (2000). Counter-culture and consumer society. Consumption, Markets & Culture, 4(3), 241–279.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Devinney, T. M., Auger, P., & Eckhardt, G. M. (2010). The myth of ethical consumer (p. 240). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dickinson, R. A., & Carsky, M. L. (2005). In R. Harrison, T. Newholm, & D. Shaw (Eds.), The consumer as economic voter (pp. 25–36). London: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Durrer, V., & Miles, S. (2009). New perspectives on the role of cultural intermediaries in social inclusion in the UK. Consumption, Markets & Culture, 12(3), 225–241.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Farinetti, O. (2009). Coccodè. Milano: Giunti.

    Google Scholar 

  • Freestone, O., & McGoldrick, P. (2008). Motivations of the ethical consumer. Journal of Business Ethics, 79(4), 445–467.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fridell, G. (2009). The co-operative and the corporation: Competing visions of the future of fair trade. Journal of Business Ethics, 86, 81–95.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Frostenson, M., Helin, S., & Sandstrom, J. (2011). Organising corporate responsibility communication through filtration: A study of web communication patterns in Swedish retail. Journal of Business Ethics, 100(1), 31–43.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gendron, C., Bisaillon, V., & Rance, A. I. O. (2009). The institutionalization of fair trade: More than just a degraded form of social action. Journal of Business Ethics, 86, 63–79.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Harrison, R., Newholm, T., & Shaw, D. (Eds.). (2005). The ethical consumer. London: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hiatt, S. R., Sine, W. D., & Tolbert, P. S. (2009). From Pabst to Pepsi: The deinstitutionalization of social practices and the creation of entrepreneurial opportunities. Administrative Science Quarterly, 54(4), 635–667.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hira, A., & Ferrie, J. (2006). Fair trade: Three key challenges for reaching the mainstream. Journal of Business Ethics, 63(2), 107–118.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Holzer, B. (2006). Political consumerism between individual choice and collective action: Social movements, role mobilization and signalling. International Journal of Consumer Studies, 30(5), 405–415.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Honkanen, P., Verplanken, B., & Olsen, S. O. (2006). Ethical values and motives driving organic food choice. Journal of Consumer Behaviour, 5(5), 420–430.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Huneke, M. E. (2005). The face of the un-consumer: An empirical examination of the practice of voluntary simplicity in the United States. Psychology & Marketing, 22(7), 527–550.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Huybrechts, B., & Reed, D. (2010). Introduction: Fair trade in different national contexts. Journal of Business Ethics, 92, 147–150.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hye-Jin, P., & Nelson, M. R. (2009). To buy or not to buy: Determinants of socially responsible consumer behavior and consumer reactions to cause-related and boycotting ads. Journal of Current Issues & Research in Advertising, 31(2), 75–90.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Izberk-Bilgin, E. (2010). An interdisciplinary review of resistance to consumption, some marketing interpretations, and future research suggestions. Consumption, Markets and Culture, 13(3), 299–323.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jaffee, D. (2010). Fair trade standards, corporate participation, and social movement responses in the United States. Journal of Business Ethics, 92, 267–285.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kim, G., Lee, G., & Park, K. (2010). A cross-national investigation on how ethical consumers build loyalty toward fair trade brands. Journal of Business Ethics, 96(4), 589–611.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kniazeva, M., & Venkatesh, A. (2007). Food for thought: A study of food consumption in postmodern US culture. Journal of Consumer Behaviour, 6(6), 419–435.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kozinets, R. V., & Handelman, J. M. (2004). Adversaries of consumption: Consumer movements, activism, and ideology. Journal of Consumer Research, 31(3), 691–704.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kozinets, R. V., Handelman, J. M., & Lee, M. S. W. (2010). Don’t read this; or, who cares what the hell anti-consumption is, anyways? Consumption, Markets & Culture, 13(3), 225–233.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lang, T., & Gabriel, Y. (2005). A brief history of consumer activism. In R. Harrison, T. Newholm, & D. Shaw (Eds.), The ethical consumer (pp. 39–54). London: Sage.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Lavine, M. (2010). From scholarly dialogue to social movement: Considerations and implications for peace through commerce. Journal of Business Ethics, 89, 603–614.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lee, M. S. W., & Fernandez, K. V. (2009). Anti-consumption: An overview and research agenda. Journal of Business Research, 62(2), 145–147.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lockie, S., Lyons, K., Lawrence, G., & Grice, J. (2004). Choosing organics: A path analysis of factors underlying the selection of organic food among Australian consumers. Appetite, 43(2), 135–146.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Low, W., & Davenport, E. (2005). Has the medium (roast) become the message? The ethics of marketing fair trade in the mainstream. International Marketing Review, 22(5), 494–511.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Low, W., & Davenport, E. (2006). Mainstreaming fair trade: Adoption, assimilation, appropriation. Journal of Strategic Marketing, 14(4), 315–327.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Low, W., & Davenport, E. (2009). Organizational leadership, ethics and the challenges of marketing fair and ethical trade. Journal of Business Ethics, 86, 97–108.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lyon, S. (2006). Evaluating fair trade consumption: Politics, defetishization and producer participation. International Journal of Consumer Studies, 30(5), 452–464.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Maon, F., Lindgreen, A., & Swaen, V. (2009). Designing and implementing corporate social responsibility: An integrative framework grounded in theory and practice. Journal of Business Ethics, 87, 71–89.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Martin, D. M., & Schouten, J. W. (2009). Engineering a mainstream market for sustainability: Insights from Wal-Mart’s perfect storm. In J. F. J. Sherry & E. Fisher (Eds.), Explorations in consumer culture theory (pp. 150–168). London: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • McDonald, S., Oates, C. J., Young, C. W., & Hwang, K. (2006). Toward sustainable consumption: Researching voluntary simplifiers. Psychology & Marketing, 23(6), 515–534.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Micheletti, M. (2003). Political virtue and shopping: Individuals, consumerism, and collective action. Basingstoke, UK: Palgrave MacMillan.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Moore, O. (2006). Understanding postorganic fresh fruit and vegetable consumers at participatory farmers’ markets in Ireland: Reflexivity, trust and social movements. International Journal of Consumer Studies, 30(5), 416–426.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Moraes, C., Szmigin, I., & Carrigan, M. (2010). Living production-engaged alternatives: An examination of new consumption communities. Consumption, Markets & Culture, 13(3), 273–298.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Neilson, L. A. (2010). ‘Boycott or buycott? Understanding political consumerism’. Journal of Consumer Behaviour, 9(3), 214–227.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Nelson, M. R., Rademacher, M. A., & Paek, H. (2007). ‘Downshifting consumer = upshifting citizen? An examination of a local freecycle community’. Annals of the American Academy of Political and Social Science, 611, 141–156.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Newholm, T., & Shaw, D. (2007). Studying the ethical consumer: A review of research. Journal of Consumer Behaviour, 6(5), 253–270.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Nicholls, A. (2010). Fair trade: Towards an economics of virtue. Journal of Business Ethics, 92, 241–255.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Nicholls, A., & Lee, N. (2006). Purchase decision-making in fair trade and the ethical purchase ‘gap’: Is there a fair trade twix? Journal of Strategic Marketing, 14(4), 369–386.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Özçağlar-Toulouse, N., Béji-Bécheur, A., & Murphy, P. (2009). Fair trade in France: From individual innovators to contemporary networks. Journal of Business Ethics, 90, 589–606.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Özçağlar-Toulouse, N., Shiu, E., & Shaw, D. (2006). In search of fair trade: Ethical consumer decision making in France. International Journal of Consumer Studies, 30(5), 502–514.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Parkins, W., & Craig, G. (2006). Slow living. Oxford; New York: Berg.

    Google Scholar 

  • Patton, M. Q. (1990). Qualitative evaluation and research methods. Newbury Park, CA: Sage Publications.

    Google Scholar 

  • Perrini, F., Castaldo, S., Misani, N., & Tencati, A. (2010). The impact of corporate social responsibility associations on trust in organic products marketed by mainstream retailers: A study of Italian consumers. Business Strategy and the Environment, 19(8), 512–526.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Petrini, C. (2005). Buono, pulito e giusto: Principi di nuova gastronomia. Torino: Einaudi.

    Google Scholar 

  • Petrini, C., & Padovani, G. (2006). Slow food revolution: A new culture for eating and living. New York: Rizzoli.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pietrykowski, B. (2004). You are what you eat: The social economy of the slow food movement. Review of Social Economy, 62(3), 307–321.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rao, H., Morrill, C., & Zald, M. N. (2000). Power plays: How social movements and collective action create new organizational forms. Research in Organizational Behavior, 22, 237.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sartorio, A. (2008). Il mercante di utopie. Milano: Sperling & Kupfer.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sassatelli, R., & Davolio, F. (2010). Consumption, pleasure and politics: Slow food and the politico-aesthetic problematization of food. Journal of Consumer Culture, 10(2), 202–232.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Shaw, D., & Moraes, C. (2009). Voluntary simplicity: An exploration of market interactions. International Journal of Consumer Studies, 33(2), 215–223.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Shaw, D., & Newholm, T. (2002). Voluntary simplicity and the ethics of consumption. Psychology & Marketing, 19(2), 167–185.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Shaw, D., Newholm, T., & Dickinson, R. (2006). Consumption as voting: An exploration of consumer empowerment. European Journal of Marketing, 40(9–10), 1049–1067.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Shaw, D., & Shiu, E. (2002). The role of ethical obligation and self-identity in ethical consumer choice. International Journal of Consumer Studies, 26(2), 109.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Spiggle, S. (1994). Analysis and interpretation of qualitative data in consumer research. Journal of Consumer Research, 21(3), 491–503.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tencati, A., & Zslonai, L. (2012). Collaborative enterprise and sustainability: The case of slow food. Journal of Business Ethics. doi:10.1007/s10551-011-1178-1.

  • Thogersen, J. (2010). Country differences in sustainable consumption: The case of organic food. Journal of Macromarketing, 30(2), 171–185.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Thompson, C. J., & Arsel, Z. (2004). The Starbucks brandscape and consumers’ (anticorporate) experiences of glocalization. Journal of Consumer Research, 31(3), 631–642.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Thompson, C. J., & Coskuner-Balli, G. (2007). Countervailing market responses to corporate co-optation and the ideological recruitment of consumption communities. Journal of Consumer Research, 34(2), 135–152.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Venkatesh, A., & Meamber, L. A. (2006). Arts and aesthetics: Marketing and cultural production. Marketing Theory, 6(1), 11–39.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Vermeir, I., & Verbeke, W. (2006). Sustainable food consumption: Exploring the consumer “attitude-behavioral intention” gap. Journal of Agricultural and Environmental Ethics, 19(2), 169–194.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Vermeir, I., & Verbeke, W. (2008). Sustainable food consumption among young adults in Belgium: Theory of planned behaviour and the role of confidence and values. Ecological Economics, 64(3), 542–553.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Vitell, S. J. (2003). Consumer ethics research: Review, synthesis and suggestions for the future. Journal of Business Ethics, 43(1), 33–47.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. SeGeSTa (Department of Management), Università Cattolica del Sacro Cuore, Via Necchi 7, 20123, Milan, Italy

    Roberta Sebastiani & Francesca Montagnini

  2. Dipartimento di Economia Aziendale, University of Pisa, Via Ridolfi 10, 56124, Pisa, Italy

    Daniele Dalli

Authors
  1. Roberta Sebastiani
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Francesca Montagnini
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Daniele Dalli
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Roberta Sebastiani.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Sebastiani, R., Montagnini, F. & Dalli, D. Ethical Consumption and New Business Models in the Food Industry. Evidence from the Eataly Case. J Bus Ethics 114, 473–488 (2013). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10551-012-1343-1

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10551-012-1343-1

Keywords

Search

Navigation