Skip to main content
Log in

The Duty of Fair Dealing: Board Judgment in Management Led Buyouts

  • Published:
Journal of Business Ethics Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

This paper investigates board judgment in response to management led buyouts (MLBs). Board response is suggested to be guided by the business judgment rule and its dual duties of care and loyalty. The duty of loyalty is seen to be evolving into a specification of fair dealing. With this trend, the current interpretation of the business judgment rule emphasizes the role of care and relies on the market to insure fairness. Possible failures in the MLB market which limit its effectiveness in assuring fairness are discussed. Recommendations to counteract these failures are suggested.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Allen, W. T.: 1990, ‘Independent Directors in MBO Transactions: Are They Fact or Fantasy?’, The Business Lawyer 45, 2055–2063.

    Google Scholar 

  • American Law Institute (ALI): 1992, Principles of Corporate Governance: Analysis and Recommendations (Philadelphia, PA: The American Law Institute).

    Google Scholar 

  • Beveridge, N. P. Jr.: 1992, ‘The Corporate Director's Fiduciary Duy of Loyalty: Understanding the Self-Interested Director Transaction’, DePaul Law Review 41, 655–688.

    Google Scholar 

  • Borden, A.: 1974, ‘Going Private - Old Tort, New Tort or No Tort?’, New York University Law Review 49(6), 987–1042.

    Google Scholar 

  • Branson, D. M.: 1993, Corporate Governance (Charlottesville, VA: The Michie Company).

    Google Scholar 

  • Bratton, W. W.: 1993, ‘Self Regulation, Normative Choice, and the Structure of Corporate Fiduciary Law’, The George Washington Law Review 61(4), 1084–1129.

    Google Scholar 

  • Brudney, V.: 1992, ‘Going-Private Regulation in an Era of “Round Trip” Transactions: A Commentary’, Washington University Law Quarterly 70, 613–616.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bruner, R. E. and L. S. Paine: 1988, ‘Management Buyout and Managerial Ethics’, California Management Review 30(4), 89–106.

    Google Scholar 

  • Davis, J. and K. Lehn: 1992, ‘Information Asymmetries, Rule 13e-3, and Premiums in Going-Private Transactions’, Washington Univresity Law Quarterly 70, 587–611.

    Google Scholar 

  • DeAngelo, H. and L. DeAngelo: 1987, ‘Management Buyouts of Publicly Traded Corporations’, Financial Analysts JournalMay/June, 38–48.

  • Fox, I. and A. Macrus: 1992, ‘The Causes and Consequences of Leveraged Management Buyouts’, Academy of Management Review 17(1), 62–85.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gilson, R. J.: 1989, ‘Market Review of Interested Transactions: The American Law Institute Proposal on Management Buyouts’, in Y. Amihud (ed.), Leveraged Management Buyouts. (Homewood, IL: Dow Jones-Irwin) 10, 217–239.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gilson, R. J. and R. Kraakman: 1991, ‘Reinventing The Outside Director: An Agenda For Institutional Investors’, Stanford Law Review 43, 863–906.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hazen, T. L.: 1990, ‘Management Buyouts and Corporate Governance Paradigms’, Wake Forest Law Review 25(1), 1–13.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hinnant, W.: 1988, ‘Fiduciary Duties of Directors: How Far Do They Go?’, Wake Forrest Law Review 23, 163–180.

    Google Scholar 

  • Houston, D. A. and J. S. Howe: 1987, ‘The Ethics of Going Private’, Journal of Business Ethics 6, 519–525.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jones, T. M. and R. O. Hunt III: 1991, ‘The Ethics of Leveraged Management Buyout Revisited’, Journal of Business Ethics 10, 833–840.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kesner, I. F. and D. R. Dalton: 1986, ‘Boards of Directors and the Checks and (Im)balances of Corporate Governance’, Business Horizons 29(5), 17–23.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lehn, K.: 1990, ‘Public Policy Toward Corporate Restructuring’, Business Economics 25(2), 26–31.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lipton, M. and A. R. Brownstein: 1985, ‘Takeover Responses and Directors' Responsibilities - An Update’, The Business Lawyer 40, 1403–1430.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lowenstein, M. J.: 1985, ‘Management Buyouts’, Columbia Law Review 85, 730–784.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lowenstein, M. J.: 1994, ‘The SEC and the Future of Corporate Governance’, Alabama Law Review 45(3), 783–815.

    Google Scholar 

  • O'Connor, M. A.: 1993, ‘How should We Talk About Fiduciary Duty? Directors' Conflict-of-Interest Transactions and the ALI's Principles of Corporate Governance’, The George Washington Law Review 61(4), 954–983.

    Google Scholar 

  • Shaw, B.: 1990, ‘Resolving the Conflict of Interest in Management Buyouts’, Hofstra Law Review 19, 143–170.

    Google Scholar 

  • Simpson, D. B.: 1993, ‘The Management Buyout: An Idea Whose Time May Have Passed’, Seton Hall Legislative Journal 17, 137–199.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sommer, A. A., Jr.: 1992, ‘“Going Private” Seventeen Years Late’, Washington University Law Quarterly 70, 571–582.

    Google Scholar 

  • Weidenbaum, M.: 1992, ‘Lessons of an Outside Director’, Washington University Law Quarterly 70, 563–569.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Sebora, T.C., Rubach, M.J. The Duty of Fair Dealing: Board Judgment in Management Led Buyouts. Journal of Business Ethics 17, 7–13 (1998). https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1005705626695

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1005705626695

Keywords

Navigation