Mathematical descriptions are necessarily more refined than the physical operations that they purport to represent.
G.L. Sewell
Abstract
This paper addresses the doubts voiced by Wigner about the physical relevance of the concept of geometrical points by exploiting some facts known to all but honored by none: Almost all real numbers are transcendental; the explicit representation of any one will require an infinite amount of physical resources. An instrument devised to measure a continuous real variable will need a continuum of internal states to achieve perfect resolution. Consequently, a laboratory instrument for measuring a continuous variable in a finite time can report only a finite number of values, each of which is constrained to be a rational number. It does not matter whether the variable is classical or quantum-mechanical. Now, in von Neumann’s measurement theory (von Neumann, Mathematical Foundations of Quantum Mechanics, Princeton University Press, Princeton, [1955]), an operator A with a continuous spectrum—which has no eigenvectors—cannot be measured, but it can be approximated by operators with discrete spectra which are measurable. The measurable approximant F(A) is not canonically determined; it has to be chosen by the experimentalist. It is argued that this operator can always be chosen in such a way that Sewell’s results (Sewell in Rep. Math. Phys. 56: 271, [2005]; Sewell, Lecture given at the J.T. Lewis Memorial Conference, Dublin, [2005]) on the measurement of a hermitian operator on a finite-dimensional vector space (described in Sect. 3.2) constitute an adequate resolution of the measurement problem in this theory. From this follows our major conclusion, which is that the notion of a geometrical point is as meaningful in nonrelativistic quantum mechanics as it is in classical physics. It is necessary to be sensitive to the fact that there is a gap between theoretical and experimental physics, which reveals itself tellingly as an error inherent in the measurement of a continuous variable.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Araki, H., Yanase, M.M.: Measurement of quantum-mechanical operators. Phys. Rev. 120, 622 (1960)
Bell, J.S.: On wave-packet reduction in the Coleman–Hepp model. Helv. Phys. Acta 48, 93 (1975)
Bohr, N., Kramers, H.A., Slater, J.C.: The quantum theory of radiation. Philos. Mag. 47(281), 785 (1924). Reprinted in [21]
Emch, G.: Coarse-graining in Liouville space and master equation. Helv. Phys. Acta 37, 532 (1964)
Fraenkel, A.A., Bar-Hillel, Y., Levy, A. (in collaboration with D. van Dalen): Foundations of Set Theory, 2nd edn., North-Holland, Amsterdam (1973). Reprinted by Elsevier, Amsterdam, 2001
Hegerfeldt, G.C.: Remark on causality and particle localization. Phys. Rev. D 10, 3320 (1974)
Hepp, K.: Quantum theory of measurement and macroscopic observables. Helv. Phys. Acta 45, 237 (1972)
van Kampen, N.: Quantum statistics of irreversible processes. Physica 20, 603 (1954)
van Kampen, N.: Fundamental problems in statistical mechanics of irreversible processes. In: Cohen, E.D.G. (ed.) Fundamental Problems in Statistical Mechanics, pp. 173–203. North-Holland, Amsterdam (1962)
van Kampen, N.: Ten theorems about quantum mechanical measurements. Physica A 153, 97 (1988)
Lanford, O., Ruelle, D.: Observables at infinity and states with short-range correlations in statistical mechanics. Commun. Math. Phys. 13, 194 (1969)
London, F., Bauer, E.: La théorie de l’observation en mécanique quantique. Actualités scientifiques et industrielles: Exposés de physique générale, No. 775. Hermann, Paris (1939). English translation, including a new paragraph by F. London, pp. 217–259 of [22]
von Neumann, J.: Mathematical Foundations of Quantum Mechanics. Princeton University Press, Princeton (1955). Translated from the German by R.T. Beyer. (German original: Mathematische Grundlagen der Quantenmechanik. Springer, Berlin, 1932.)
Reed, M., Simon, B.: Methods of Modern Mathematical Physics I, Functional Analysis. Academic Press, New York (1972)
Riesz, F., Sz.-Nagy, B.: Functional Analysis. Ungar, New York (1955). Translated from the French by L.F. Boron. (French Original: Leçons d’analyse fonctionelle, 2nd edn. Akademiai Kiado, Budapest, 1953.)
Schweber, S.S.: An Introduction to Relativistic Quantum Field Theory. Harper & Row, New York (1962)
Sen, R.N.: Why is the Euclidean line the same as the real line? Found. Phys. Lett. 12, 325 (1999)
Sewell, G.L.: Quantum Mechanics and its Emergent Macrophysics. Princeton University Press, Princeton (2002)
Sewell, G.L.: On the mathematical structure of quantum measurement theory. Rep. Math. Phys. 56, 271 (2005)
Sewell, G.L.: Can the quantum measurement problem be resolved within the framework of Schrödinger dynamics? Lecture given at the J.T. Lewis Memorial Conference, Dublin, 14–17 June, 2005
van der Waerden, B.L. (ed.): Sources of Quantum Mechanics. North-Holland, Amsterdam (1967). Reprinted by Dover, New York, 2007
Wheeler, J.A., Zurek, W.H. (eds.): Quantum Theory and Measurement. Princeton University Press, Princeton (1983)
Wigner, E.P.: Die Messung quantenmechanischer Operatoren. Z. Phys. 133, 101 (1952)
Wigner, E.P.: The problem of measurement. Am. J. Phys. 31, 6 (1963). Reprinted in [25] and [22]
Wigner, E.P.: Symmetries and Reflections. MIT Press, Cambridge (1970)
Wigner, E.P.: Interpretation of Quantum Mechanics. Lectures given in the Physics Department of Princeton University during 1976, as revised for publication, 1981, pp. 260–314 of [22]
Yanase, M.: Optimal measuring apparatus. Phys. Rev. 123, 666 (1961)
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Sen, R.N. Physics and the Measurement of Continuous Variables. Found Phys 38, 301–316 (2008). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10701-007-9203-z
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10701-007-9203-z