Skip to main content
Log in

Physics and the Measurement of Continuous Variables

  • Published:
Foundations of Physics Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Mathematical descriptions are necessarily more refined than the physical operations that they purport to represent.

G.L. Sewell

Abstract

This paper addresses the doubts voiced by Wigner about the physical relevance of the concept of geometrical points by exploiting some facts known to all but honored by none: Almost all real numbers are transcendental; the explicit representation of any one will require an infinite amount of physical resources. An instrument devised to measure a continuous real variable will need a continuum of internal states to achieve perfect resolution. Consequently, a laboratory instrument for measuring a continuous variable in a finite time can report only a finite number of values, each of which is constrained to be a rational number. It does not matter whether the variable is classical or quantum-mechanical. Now, in von Neumann’s measurement theory (von Neumann, Mathematical Foundations of Quantum Mechanics, Princeton University Press, Princeton, [1955]), an operator A with a continuous spectrum—which has no eigenvectors—cannot be measured, but it can be approximated by operators with discrete spectra which are measurable. The measurable approximant F(A) is not canonically determined; it has to be chosen by the experimentalist. It is argued that this operator can always be chosen in such a way that Sewell’s results (Sewell in Rep. Math. Phys. 56: 271, [2005]; Sewell, Lecture given at the J.T. Lewis Memorial Conference, Dublin, [2005]) on the measurement of a hermitian operator on a finite-dimensional vector space (described in Sect. 3.2) constitute an adequate resolution of the measurement problem in this theory. From this follows our major conclusion, which is that the notion of a geometrical point is as meaningful in nonrelativistic quantum mechanics as it is in classical physics. It is necessary to be sensitive to the fact that there is a gap between theoretical and experimental physics, which reveals itself tellingly as an error inherent in the measurement of a continuous variable.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Araki, H., Yanase, M.M.: Measurement of quantum-mechanical operators. Phys. Rev. 120, 622 (1960)

    Article  MATH  ADS  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  2. Bell, J.S.: On wave-packet reduction in the Coleman–Hepp model. Helv. Phys. Acta 48, 93 (1975)

    MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  3. Bohr, N., Kramers, H.A., Slater, J.C.: The quantum theory of radiation. Philos. Mag. 47(281), 785 (1924). Reprinted in [21]

    Google Scholar 

  4. Emch, G.: Coarse-graining in Liouville space and master equation. Helv. Phys. Acta 37, 532 (1964)

    MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  5. Fraenkel, A.A., Bar-Hillel, Y., Levy, A. (in collaboration with D. van Dalen): Foundations of Set Theory, 2nd edn., North-Holland, Amsterdam (1973). Reprinted by Elsevier, Amsterdam, 2001

  6. Hegerfeldt, G.C.: Remark on causality and particle localization. Phys. Rev. D 10, 3320 (1974)

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  7. Hepp, K.: Quantum theory of measurement and macroscopic observables. Helv. Phys. Acta 45, 237 (1972)

    Google Scholar 

  8. van Kampen, N.: Quantum statistics of irreversible processes. Physica 20, 603 (1954)

    Article  MATH  ADS  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  9. van Kampen, N.: Fundamental problems in statistical mechanics of irreversible processes. In: Cohen, E.D.G. (ed.) Fundamental Problems in Statistical Mechanics, pp. 173–203. North-Holland, Amsterdam (1962)

    Google Scholar 

  10. van Kampen, N.: Ten theorems about quantum mechanical measurements. Physica A 153, 97 (1988)

    Article  ADS  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  11. Lanford, O., Ruelle, D.: Observables at infinity and states with short-range correlations in statistical mechanics. Commun. Math. Phys. 13, 194 (1969)

    Article  ADS  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  12. London, F., Bauer, E.: La théorie de l’observation en mécanique quantique. Actualités scientifiques et industrielles: Exposés de physique générale, No. 775. Hermann, Paris (1939). English translation, including a new paragraph by F. London, pp. 217–259 of [22]

    Google Scholar 

  13. von Neumann, J.: Mathematical Foundations of Quantum Mechanics. Princeton University Press, Princeton (1955). Translated from the German by R.T. Beyer. (German original: Mathematische Grundlagen der Quantenmechanik. Springer, Berlin, 1932.)

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  14. Reed, M., Simon, B.: Methods of Modern Mathematical Physics I, Functional Analysis. Academic Press, New York (1972)

    Google Scholar 

  15. Riesz, F., Sz.-Nagy, B.: Functional Analysis. Ungar, New York (1955). Translated from the French by L.F. Boron. (French Original: Leçons d’analyse fonctionelle, 2nd edn. Akademiai Kiado, Budapest, 1953.)

    Google Scholar 

  16. Schweber, S.S.: An Introduction to Relativistic Quantum Field Theory. Harper & Row, New York (1962)

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  17. Sen, R.N.: Why is the Euclidean line the same as the real line? Found. Phys. Lett. 12, 325 (1999)

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  18. Sewell, G.L.: Quantum Mechanics and its Emergent Macrophysics. Princeton University Press, Princeton (2002)

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  19. Sewell, G.L.: On the mathematical structure of quantum measurement theory. Rep. Math. Phys. 56, 271 (2005)

    Article  MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  20. Sewell, G.L.: Can the quantum measurement problem be resolved within the framework of Schrödinger dynamics? Lecture given at the J.T. Lewis Memorial Conference, Dublin, 14–17 June, 2005

  21. van der Waerden, B.L. (ed.): Sources of Quantum Mechanics. North-Holland, Amsterdam (1967). Reprinted by Dover, New York, 2007

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  22. Wheeler, J.A., Zurek, W.H. (eds.): Quantum Theory and Measurement. Princeton University Press, Princeton (1983)

    Google Scholar 

  23. Wigner, E.P.: Die Messung quantenmechanischer Operatoren. Z. Phys. 133, 101 (1952)

    Article  MATH  ADS  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  24. Wigner, E.P.: The problem of measurement. Am. J. Phys. 31, 6 (1963). Reprinted in [25] and [22]

    Article  MATH  ADS  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  25. Wigner, E.P.: Symmetries and Reflections. MIT Press, Cambridge (1970)

    Google Scholar 

  26. Wigner, E.P.: Interpretation of Quantum Mechanics. Lectures given in the Physics Department of Princeton University during 1976, as revised for publication, 1981, pp. 260–314 of [22]

  27. Yanase, M.: Optimal measuring apparatus. Phys. Rev. 123, 666 (1961)

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to R. N. Sen.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Sen, R.N. Physics and the Measurement of Continuous Variables. Found Phys 38, 301–316 (2008). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10701-007-9203-z

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10701-007-9203-z

Keywords

Navigation