Hostname: page-component-8448b6f56d-c47g7 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-04-23T07:05:46.178Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Alexander on Soul - P. Accattino, P. Donini (edd.): Alessandro di Afrodisia: ĽAnima: traduzione, introduzione e commento. (Biblioteca Universale Laterza, 447.) Pp. xxxvi + 324. Rome, Bari: Laterza, 1996. Paper, L. 58,000. ISBN: 88-420-4843-7.

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  16 February 2009

R. W. Sharples
R. W. Sharples*
Affiliation:
University College London
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

An abstract is not available for this content so a preview has been provided. Please use the Get access link above for information on how to access this content.
Image of the first page of this content. For PDF version, please use the ‘Save PDF’ preceeding this image.'
Type
Book Review
Information
The Classical Review , Volume 47 , Issue 2 , October 1997 , pp. 294 - 295
Copyright
Copyright © The Classical Association 1997

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

1 Moraux, Paul, Alexandre ď Aphrodise: Exégète de la noëtique ď Aristote (Liége and Paris, 1942).Google Scholar

2 Schroeder, F. M. and Todd, R. B., Two Aristotelian Greek Commentators on the Intellect (Toronto, 1990) p. 30.Google Scholar

3 cf. Schroeder-Todd, op. cit., p. 27.

4 Williams, B., ‘Hylomorphism’, Oxford Studies in Ancient Philosophy 4 (1986), 189–199.Google Scholar

5 Charles, D., ‘Matter and Form: Unity, Persistence and Identity’, in Scaltsas, T., Charles, D., and Gill, M. L. (eds.), Unity, Identity and Explanation in Aristotle's Metaphysics (Oxford, 1994), 75–105, at l00ff.Google Scholar

6 Caston, V., ‘Epiphenomenalisms, Ancient and Modern’, Philosophical Review 106 (1997).CrossRefGoogle Scholar

7 They also show (pp. 115–17) that he says nothing about the generation of form that conflicts with Aristotle, Metaph. Z 8 1033b5ff., provided that text is correctly interpreted.