Skip to main content
Log in

Biology intersects religion and morality

  • Reviews
  • Published:
Biology and Philosophy Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Michael Ruse's writings explore what sociobiology says about morality. Further, he claims that sociobiology undermines the base for Christian morality. After responding to criticisms of Ruse, especially those of Arthur Peacocke, I lay a base for meeting his challenge.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Barbour, I. G.: 1966, Issues in Science and Religion, SCM Press, London.

    Google Scholar 

  • Davies, P. C. W.: 1987, The Cosmic Blueprint, Heinemann, London.

    Google Scholar 

  • Irons, W.: 1989, ‘Where Did Morality Come From?’, presented to the Conference, ‘Evolution and Moral Norms: Interdisciplinary Perspectives on the Possibility of Ethics’, Evangelical Academy, Loccum, Germany, September 14–17, Zygon: Journal of Religion and Science.

  • Katz, S.: 1989, ‘Toward a New Concept of Global Morality’, presented to the Conference, ‘Evolution and Moral Norms: Interdisciplinary Perspectives on the Possibility of Ethics’, Evangelical Academy, Loccum, Germany, September 14–17, Zygon: Journal of Religion and Science.

  • Kaufman, G. D.: 1979, An Essay on Theological Method, Rev. Ed., American Academy of Religion Series in Religion, No. 11, Scholars Press, Missoula, Montana.

    Google Scholar 

  • Manenschijn, G.: 1988, ‘Evolution and Ethics’, in S. Anderson and A. R. Peacocke (eds.), Evolution and Creation, Aarhus University Press, Aarhus, Denmark, pp. 85–103.

    Google Scholar 

  • McFague, S.: 1982, Metaphorical Theology: Models of God in Religious Language, Fortress Press, Philadelphia.

    Google Scholar 

  • Peacocke, A. R.: 1979, Creation and the World of Science: The Bampton Lectures, 1978, Clarendon Press, Oxford.

    Google Scholar 

  • Peacocke, A. R.: 1986, God and the New Biology, Harper & Row, San Francisco.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ruse, M.: 1989, The Darwinian Paradigm: Essays on Its History, Philosophy, and Religious Implications, Routledge, London and New York.

  • Ruse, M. and Wilson, E. O.: 1985, ‘The Evolution of Ethics’, New Scientist 108 (1478) 50–52.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ruse, M. and Wilson, E. O.: 1986, ‘Moral Philosophy as Applied Science’, Philosophy 61 (236), 173–192.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sharpe, K. J.: 1984, From Science to an Adequate Mythology, Interface Press, Auckland, New Zealand.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sharpe, K. J.: 1989, David Bohm's World: New Physics and New Religion.

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Sharpe, K.J. Biology intersects religion and morality. Biol Philos 7, 77–88 (1992). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00130166

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00130166

Key words

Navigation