Abstract
A plausible and popular rule governing the scope of truth-functional logic is shown to be indequate. The argument appeals to the existence of truth-functional paraphrases which are logically independent of their natural language counterparts. A more adequate rule is proposed.
Similar content being viewed by others
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Sherry, D. Note on the Scope of Truth-functional Logic. Journal of Philosophical Logic 28, 327–328 (1999). https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1004367312707
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1004367312707