Skip to main content
Log in

The Revival of Vivisection in the Sixteenth Century

  • Published:
Journal of the History of Biology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

In this article I examine the origins and progression of the practice of vivisection in roughly the first half of the sixteenth century, paying particular attention to the types of vivisection procedures performed, the classical sources for those procedures and the changing nature of the concerns motivating the anatomists who performed them. My goal is to reexamine a procedure typically treated as something revived by Vesalius from classical sources as a precursor to early modern discoveries by placing the practice of vivisection in its sixteenth-century context. There were a variety of reasons for employing vivisection in the sixteenth century, including exploring the differences between living and dead bodies, considering how parts of the body worked, and advocating the entirely new idea of the pulmonary transit. By exploring the discussions of Berengario, Niccolò Massa, Vesalius, Colombo and Juan Valverde I try to elaborate on these various reasons and their origins.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Amacher, M.P. 1964. “Galen’s Experiment on the Arterial Pulse.” Sudhoffs Archiv für Geschichte der Medizin 48: 177–180.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bylebyl, Jerome. 1985. “Disputation and Description in the Renaissance Pulse Controversy.” A. Wear, R.K. French and I.M. Lonie (eds.), The Medical Renaissance of the Sixteenth Century. New York: Cambridge University Press, pp. 223–245.

    Google Scholar 

  • Berengario, da Carpi. 1521. Commentaria cum amplissimis additionibus super anatomia Mundini una cum textu eiusdem in pristinum et verum nitorem redacto. Bologna.

  • Celsus. 1938. De medicina. Translated by W.G. Spencer. Boston: Loeb Classical Library.

  • Colombo, Realdo. 1559. De re anatomica libri XV. Venice.

  • Coppola, Edward D. 1957. “The Discovery of the Pulmonary Circulation: A New Approach.” Bulletin of the History of Medicine 31: 44–77.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cunningham, Andrew. 1997. The Anatomical Renaissance. The Resurrection of the Anatomical Projects of the Ancients. Brookfield, VT:Ashgate.

    Google Scholar 

  • Durling, Richard J. 1961. “A Chronological Census of Renaissance Editions and Translations of Galen.” Journal of the Warburg and Courtauld Institutes 24: 230–305.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Farrington, Benjamin. 1931. “The Last Chapter of the De Fabrica of Vesalius, Entitled ‘Some Observations on the Dissection of Living Animals’.” Transactions of the Royal Society of South Africa 20: 1–14.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fortuna, Stefania. 2005. “Galeno Latino 1490–1530.” Medicina nei Secoli 17: 469–505.

    Google Scholar 

  • French, R.K. 1985. “Berengario da Carpi and the use of commentary in anatomical teaching.” A. Wear, R.K. French and I.M. Lonie (eds.), The Medical Renaissance of the Sixteenth Century. New York: Cambridge University Press, pp. 223–245.

    Google Scholar 

  • French, R.K. 1999. Dissection and Vivisection in the European Renaissance. Brookfield, VT: Ashgate.

    Google Scholar 

  • 1979. “A Note on the Anatomical Accessus of the Middle Ages.” Medical History 23: 461–468.

  • Furley, David J. and Wilkie, J.S. 1984. Galen. On respiration and the Arteries. Princeton: Princeton University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Guenther, Johannes. 1539. Insitutionum anatomicarum. Basel.

  • Guerrini, Anita. 2003. Experimenting with Humans and Animals: From Galen to Human Rights. Baltimore: The Johns Hopkins University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Heseler, Baldassar. 1959. Andreas Vesalius’ First Public Anatomy at Bologna 1540: An Eyewitness Report by Baldassar Heseler. Ed. and translated by Roben Eriksson. Stockholm: Alqvist and Wiksells.

  • Lind, L.R. 1959. Jacopo Berengario da Carpi: A Short Introduction to Anatomy (Isagogae Breves). Chicago: The University of Chicago Press.

  • Lind, L.R. 1975. Studies in Pre-Vesalian Anatomy Biography, translations, documents. Philadelphia: The American Philosophical Society.

    Google Scholar 

  • Massa, Nicolò. 1536. Liber introductorius anathomiae. Venice.

  • May, Margaret Tallmadge. trans. 1968. Galen. On the Usefulness of the Parts of the Body. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press.

  • Manzoni, Tullio. 2008. “Cuore caldo o cervello freddo? Antiche controversie alla nascita delle neuroscienze.” Marco Piccolino (ed.), Neuroscienze controverse. Da Aristotele alla moderna scienza del linguaggio. Torino: Bollati Boringhieri, pp. 3–48.

    Google Scholar 

  • O’Malley, C.D. 1964. Andreas Vesalius of Brussels. 1514–1564. Los Angeles: University of California Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Palmer, Richard. 1981. “Niccolò Massa, his Family and his Fortune.” Medical History 25: 385–410.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Putti, Vittoro. 1937. Berengario da Carpi, Saggio Biografico e Bibliografico Seguito dalla Traduzione del “De Fractura Calvae Sive Cranei”. Bologna: L. Capelli.

    Google Scholar 

  • Richardson, William Frank and Carman, John Burd. 2009. Translation of 'De Humani Corporis Libri Septem'. Novato, CA.: Norman Publishing.

  • Shank, Michael. 1985. “From Galen’s Ureters to Harvey’s Veins.” Journal of the History of Biology 18: 331–355.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Siraisi, Nancy G. 1997. “Vesalius and the Reading of Galen’s Teleology.” Renaissance Quarterly 50: 1–37.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Singer, Charles. 1956. Galen. On Anatomical Procedures. Translation of the Surviving Books with Introduction and Notes. New York: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Valverde de Hamusco, Juan. 1588. Anatome corporis humani. Venice.

  • Vesalius, Andreas. 1538. Institutionum anatomicarum secundum Galeni sententiam ad candidatos medicinae libri quatuor. Venice.

  • 1539. Epistola, docens venam auxiliarem dextri cubiti in dolore laterali secandam & melancholicum succum ex venae portae ramis ad sedem pertinentibus, purgari. Basel.

  • Vesalius, Andreas. 1543 De humani corposis fabrica libri septem.. Basel.

  • Vesalius, Andreas. 1555 De humani corporis fabrica libri septem.. Basel.

  • Walsh, Joseph. 1926. “Galen’s Discovery and Promulgation of the Function of the Recurrent Laryngeal Nerves.” Annals of Medical History VIII: 176–184.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wilson, L.G. 1962. “The Problem of the Discovery of the Pulmonary Circulation.” Journal of the History of Medicine XVII: 229–244.

    Google Scholar 

  • Zerbi, Gabriele. 1502. Liber anathomie corporis humani. Venice.

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to R. Allen Shotwell.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Allen Shotwell, R. The Revival of Vivisection in the Sixteenth Century. J Hist Biol 46, 171–197 (2013). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10739-012-9326-8

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10739-012-9326-8

Keywords

Navigation