Skip to main content
Log in

The strong proof from hypotheses and conditionals: Some theorems of deduction for relevant systems

  • I. Propositional Calculi, Their Methodology And Philosophical Applications
  • Published:
Studia Logica Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The aim of this paper is to present a modified version of the notion of strong proof from hypotheses (definition D2), and to give three deduction theorems for the relevant logicsR (theoremsT1, andT2) andE (theoremT3).

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. A.R. Anderson, N.D. Belnap,A modification of Ackermann's “rigorous implication”,The Journal of Symbolic Logic 23 (1958), pp. 457–458.

    Google Scholar 

  2. E. A. Sidorenko,On the strong proof from hypotheses,Abstracts of 6th International Congress of Logic, Methodology of Science (Sections 5,7), Hannover 1979.

  3. M.R.Diaz,Topics in the Logic of Relevance, München 1981.

  4. E. A. Sidorenko,Logičeskoe sledowanije i uslownyje wyskazywanija (in Russian), Moskva 1983.

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Sidorenko, E.A. The strong proof from hypotheses and conditionals: Some theorems of deduction for relevant systems. Stud Logica 42, 165–171 (1983). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01063836

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01063836

Keywords

Navigation