Skip to main content
Log in

The necessity and the value of placebo

  • Published:
Science and Engineering Ethics Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The use of placebo in clinical trials has been repeatedly challenged as being unacceptable from an ethical point of view. The present paper responds to this criticism by taking up the issue in the light of the pertinent provisions of the Helsinki Declaration. Examples from different therapeutic areas are given that highlight the importance of placebo in situations in which its use is acceptable according to the Declaration. Particular emphasis is given to the question of active control trials, which, under conditions of low assay sensitivity, may become an ethically less acceptable approach than the use of a placebo control.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Rothman KJ and Michels, KB (1994) The continuing unethical use of placebo controls, New England Journal of Medicine 331: 394–398.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. World Medical Association Declaration of Helsinki. Ethical principles for medical research involving human subjects. Available at: http://www.wma.net/e/policy

  3. Vastag B (2000) Helsinki discord? A controversial declaration, Journal of the American Medical Association 284: 2983–2985

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Forster HP, Emanuel E and Grady C (2001) The 2000 revision of the Declaration of Helsinki: a step forward or more confusion?, Lancet 358: 1449–1453.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Echt DS., Liebson PR, Mitchell LB, Peters RW, Obias-Manno D, Barker AH, Arensberg D, Baker A, Friedman L and Greene HL (1991) Mortality and morbidity in patients receiving encainide, flecainide, or placebo. The Cardiae Arrhythmia Suppression Trial, New England Journal of Medicine 324: 781–788.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. McCloskey RV, Straube RC, Sanders C, Smith SM and Smith CR (1994) Treatment of septic shock with human monoclonal antibody HA-1A. A randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial. CHESS Trial Study Group, Annals of Internal Medicine 121: 1–5.

    Google Scholar 

  7. Eisenberger MA, Blumenstein BA, Crawford ED, Miller G, McLeod DG, Loehrer PJ, Wilding G, Sears K, Culkin DJ, Thompson IM Jr, Bueschen AJ and Lowe BA (1998) Bilateral orchiectomy with or without flutamide for metastatic prostate cancer, New England Journal of Medicine 339: 1036–1042.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. European Agency for the Evaluation of Medicinal Products. European Public Assessment Report (EPAR) on Azomyr (desloratadine). Available at: http://www.emea.eu.int.

  9. Schoenen J and Sawyer J (1997) Zolmitriptan (Zomig, 311C90), a novel dual central and peripheral 5HT1B/1D agonist: an overview of efficacy, Cephalagia 17 (Suppl. 18): 28–40.

    Google Scholar 

  10. Leber PD (1989) Hazards of inference: the active control investigation, Epilepsia 30 Suppl. 1: S57-S63.

    Google Scholar 

  11. Emanuel EJ and Miiler FG (2001) The ethics of placebo-controlled trials — a middle ground, New England Journal of Medicine 345: 915–919.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Ernst A. Singer.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Singer, E.A. The necessity and the value of placebo. SCI ENG ETHICS 10, 51–56 (2004). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11948-004-0062-0

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11948-004-0062-0

Keywords

Navigation