Skip to main content
Log in

Does Hindsight Bias Change Perceptions of Business Ethics?

  • Published:
Journal of Business Ethics Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Ethical decision theory may not be sufficiently well developed to furnish reliable guidelines to people involved in complex decision making that involves conflict between ethical considerations and business imperatives such as making a profit. In conditions of ethical uncertainty hindsight bias may occur, and this study reports on an exploration of hindsight bias effects among participants in continuing education in business programmes. Perceptions of business ethics were found to differ among groups within the sample depending on what they thought had been the outcome of the ethical decision concerned.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Arkes, H. R., R. C. Wortmann, P. D. Savill and A. R. Harkness: 1981, 'Hindsight Bias Among Physicians Weighing the Likelihood of Diagnosis', Journal of Applied Psychology 66, 252-254.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bukszar, E and T. Connolly: 1988, 'Hindsight Bias and Strategic Choice: Some Problems in Learning from Experience', Academy of Management Journal 31, 628-641.

    Google Scholar 

  • Detmer, D. E., D. G. Fryback and K. Gassner: 1978,' Heuristics and Biases in Medical Decision Making', Journal of Medical Education 53, 682-683.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dubinsky, A. J. and B. Loken: 1989, 'Analyzing Ethical Decision Making in Marketing', Journal of Business Research 19(2), 83-107.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ferrell, O. C. and L. G. Gresham: 1985, 'A Contingency Framework for Understanding Ethical Decision Making in Marketing', Journal of Marketing 49(3), 87-96.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fischhoff, B.: 1975, 'Hindsight óForesight: The Effect of Outcome Knowledge on Judgment under Uncertainty', Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance 1, 288-299.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fischhoff, B.: 1977, 'Perceived Informativeness of Facts', Journal of Experimental Psychology 3, 349-358.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fritzche, D. J.: 1991, 'A Model of Decision-Making Incorporating Ethical Values', Journal of Business Ethics 10, 841-852.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jennings, B.: 1991, 'The Regulation of Virtue: Crosscurrents in Professional Ethics', Journal of Business Ethics 10, 561-568.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jones, T. M.: 1991, 'Ethical Decision Making by Individuals in Organizations: An Issue-Contingent Model', Academy of Management Review 16, 366-395.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kipnis, K.: 1991, 'Ethics and the Professional Responsibility of Lawyers', Journal of Business Ethics 10, 569-576.

    Google Scholar 

  • Knouse, S. B. and R. A. Giacalone: 1992, 'Ethical Decision-Making in Business: Behavioral Issues and Concerns', Journal of Business Ethics 11, 369-377.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lammers, S. E.: 1991, 'Are Physicians a “Delinquent Community?” Issues in Professional Competence, Conduct and Self-Regulation: Commentary', Journal of Business Ethics 10, 591-594.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mitchell, T. R. and L. S. Kalb: 1982, 'Effects of Job Experience on Supervisor Attributions for a Subordinate's Poor Performance', Journal of Applied Psychology 67, 181-188.

    Google Scholar 

  • Porter, L. W. and E. E. Lawler: 1968, Managerial Attitudes and Work Motivation(Irwin, Homewood, Il)

  • Schmidt, W. H. and B. Z. Posner: 1983, Managerial Values in Perspective: An AMA Survey Report(American Management Association, New York). Cited in Fritzche, 1991.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sligo, F. X.: 1991, Organisational Behaviour: Case Studies and Commentaries(Dunmore Press, Palmerston North).

    Google Scholar 

  • Stead, W. E., D. L. Worrell and J. G. Stead: 1990, 'An Integrative Model for Understanding and Managing Ethical Behavior in Business Organizations', Journal of Business Ethics 9, 233-242.

    Google Scholar 

  • Strong, K. C. and G. D. Meyer: 1992, 'An Integrative Descriptive Model of Ethical Decision Making', Journal of Business Ethics 11, 89-94.

    Google Scholar 

  • Swazey, J. P.: 1991, 'Professional Competence, Conduct and Self-Regulation', Journal of Business Ethics 10, 581-590.

    Google Scholar 

  • Trevino, L. K.: 1986, 'Ethical Decision Making in Organizations: A Person-Situation Interactionist Model', Academy of Management Review 11, 601-617.

    Google Scholar 

  • Vitell, S. J., M. Y. A. Rawwas and T. A. Festervand: 1991, 'The Business Ethics of Pharmacists: Conflicts Practices and Beliefs', Journal of Business Ethics 10, 295-301.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wong, A. and E. Beckman: 1992, 'An Applied Ethical Analysis System in Business', Journal of Business Ethics 11, 173-178.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wood, G.: 1978, 'The Knew-It-All-Along Effect', Journal of Experimental Psychology 4, 345-353.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Sligo, F., Stirton, N. Does Hindsight Bias Change Perceptions of Business Ethics?. Journal of Business Ethics 17, 111–124 (1998). https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1017946415414

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1017946415414

Keywords

Navigation