Skip to main content
Log in

Physical Restraint Elimination in the Acute Care Setting: Ethical Considerations

  • Published:
HEC Forum Aims and scope Submit manuscript

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

REFERENCES

  1. Collopy BJ. The Use of Restraints in Long-Term Care: The ethical issues — White paper. Washington, DC: American Association of Homes for the Aging; 1992.

    Google Scholar 

  2. Ortiz-Pruitt J. Physical restraint of critically ill patients: A human issue. Critical Care Nursing Clinics of North America. 1995; 7(2):363–73.

    Google Scholar 

  3. Wilson EB. Physical restraint of elderly patients in critical care: Historical perspectives and new directions. Critical Care Nursing Clinics of North America. 1996; 8(1):61–70.

    Google Scholar 

  4. Mion LC, Minnick A, Palmer R. Physical restraint use in the hospital setting: Unresolved issues and directions for research. Milbank Quarterly. 1996; 74(3):411–33.

    Google Scholar 

  5. Schafer A. Restraints and the elderly: When safety and autonomy conflict. Canadian Medical Association Journal. 1985; 132:1257–60.

    Google Scholar 

  6. Strumpf NE, Evans LK. The ethical problems of physical restraint. Journal of Gerontological Nursing. 1991; 17(2):27–30.

    Google Scholar 

  7. Moss RJ, LaPuma J. The ethics of mechanical restraints. Hastings Center Report. 1991; 21(1):22–25.

    Google Scholar 

  8. Berlin I. Four essays on liberty. Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press; 1969.

    Google Scholar 

  9. Ejaz FK et al.. Restraint reduction: Can it be achieved? The Gerontologist. 1994; 34(5):694–99.

    Google Scholar 

  10. Evans LK, Strumpf NE. Tying down the elderly: A review of the literature on physical restraint. Journal of the American Geriatrics Society. 1989; 37:65–74.

    Google Scholar 

  11. Collopy BJ. Safety and independence: Rethinking some basic concepts in long-term care. In McCullough LB, Wilson N L; (eds.). Long term care decisions: Ethical and conceptual dimensions. Baltimore, MD: Johns Hopkins University Press; 1995.

    Google Scholar 

  12. Sourly JR. Intentionality: An essay in the philosophy of the mind. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press; 1983.

    Google Scholar 

  13. Mill JS. On liberty. Indianapolis, IN: Bobbs-Merrill; 1956.

    Google Scholar 

  14. Raz J. The Morality of Freedom. New York, NY: Oxford University Press; 1986.

    Google Scholar 

  15. Feinberg J. Harm to self. New York, NY: Oxford University Press; 1986.

    Google Scholar 

  16. Feinberg J. Harm to Others. New York, NY: Oxford University Press; 1984.

    Google Scholar 

  17. Feinberg J. Offense to Others. New York, NY: Oxford University Press; 1985.

    Google Scholar 

  18. Karlsson S, Gosta B, Eriksson S, Sandman PO. Physical restraints in geriatric care in Sweden: Prevalence and patient characteristics. Journal of the American Gerontological Society. 1996; 44:1348–54.

    Google Scholar 

  19. Frengley, JD. The use of physical restraints and the absence of kindness. Journal of the American Gerontological Society. 1996; 44:1125–27.

    Google Scholar 

  20. O'Keefe S, Jack CIA, Lye M. Use of restraints and bed rails in a British Hospital. Journal of the American Gerontological Society. 1996; 44:1086–88.

    Google Scholar 

  21. Molassiotis A, Newell R. Nurses' awareness of restraint use with elderly people in Greece and the UK: A cross-cultural pilot study. International Journal of Nursing Studies. 1996; 33(2):201–11.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. Kaufman SR. Old age, disease, and the discourse on risk: Geriatric assessment in U.S. health care. Medical Anthropology Quarterly. 1994; 8(4):430–47.

    Google Scholar 

  23. Muller JH, Desmond B. Ethical dilemmas in a cross-cultural context: a Chinese example. Western Journal of Medicine. 1992; 157:323–27.

    Google Scholar 

  24. Kane RA, Caplan AL. Everyday ethics: Resolving dilemmas in nursing home life. New York, NY: Springer Publishing Co., Inc.; 1990.

    Google Scholar 

  25. SUPPORT Principal Investigators. A controlled study to improve care for seriously ill hospitalized patients. The study to understand prognoses and preferences for outcomes and risks of treatments (SUPPORT). Journal of the American Medical Association. 1995; 274:1591–98.

    Google Scholar 

  26. American Psychiatric Association. APA task force report 22: Seclusion and Restraint: The psychiatric uses. Washington, D.C.: American Psychiatric Association; 1985.

    Google Scholar 

  27. Fisher WA. Restraint and seclusion: A review of the literature. American Journal of Psychiatry. 1994; 151:1584–91.

    Google Scholar 

  28. Wadeson H, Carpenter WT. Impact of the seclusion room experience. Journal of Nervous and Mental Disorders. 1976; 163:318–28.

    Google Scholar 

  29. Binder RL, McCoy SM. A study of patients' attitudes toward placement in seclusion. Hospital and Community Psychiatry. 1983; 34:1052–54.

    Google Scholar 

  30. Strumpf NE, Evans LK. Physical restraint of the hospitalized elderly: Perceptions of patients and nurses. Nursing Research. 1988; 37:132–37.

    Google Scholar 

  31. Smith SB. Restraints: Retraumatization for rape victims? Journal of Psychosocial Nursing & Mental Health Services. 1995; 33:23–8, 40–41.

    Google Scholar 

  32. Plutchik R, Karasu TB, Conte HR, Siegel B, Jerrett I. Toward a rationale for seclusion process. Journal of Nervous and Mental Disorders. 1978; 166:571–78.

    Google Scholar 

  33. Lion JR, Levenberg LB, Strange RE. Restraining the violent patient. Journal of Psychosocial Nursing and Mental Health Services. 1972; 21:9–15.

    Google Scholar 

  34. Zimmerman PG. Increased use of unlicensed assistive personnel: Pros and cons. Journal of Emergency Nursing. 1995; 21(6):541–49.

    Google Scholar 

  35. Erlen JA, Mellors MP, Koren AM. Ethical issues and the new staff mix. Orthopedic Nursing. 1996; 15(2):73–77.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Slomka, J., Agich, G.J., Stagno, S.J. et al. Physical Restraint Elimination in the Acute Care Setting: Ethical Considerations. HEC Forum 10, 244–262 (1998). https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1008844314555

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1008844314555

Keywords

Navigation