Notes
In analytic philosophy, the work of Terry Horgan and Mark Timmons has done a good deal to remind some philosophers of the significance of moral phenomenology. See, amongst other things, their (2005) and (2008). See also the special issue of Phenomenology and the Cognitive Sciences 2008 (7) and Drummond and Embree (2002).
Levinas 1986, 24.
Levinas 1986, 24.
References
Drummond, J., & Embree, L. (Eds.). (2002). Phenomenological approaches to moral philosophy: A handbook. Dordrecht: Kluwer Academic Publishers.
Horgan, T., & Timmons, M. (2005). Moral phenomenology and moral theory. Philosophical Issues, 15, 56–77.
Horgan, T., & Timmons, M. (2008). What can moral phenomenology tell us about moral objectivity? Social Philosophy and Policy, 25, 267–300.
Levinas, E. (1986). Dialogue with Levinas. In R. Cohen (Ed.), Face to face with Levinas. Albany: State University of New York Press.
Sheets-Johnstone, M. (1990). The roots of thinking. Philadelphia: Temple University Press.
Sheets-Johnstone, M. (1994). The roots of power: Animate form and gendered bodies. Chicago: Open Court Publishing.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Smith, B. Book review of Maxine Sheets-Johnstone’s The Roots of Morality . Phenom Cogn Sci 10, 419–422 (2011). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11097-011-9206-2
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11097-011-9206-2