Skip to main content
Log in

Calculating self-referential statements, I: Explicit calculations

  • Published:
Studia Logica Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The proof of the Second Incompleteness Theorem consists essentially of proving the uniqueness and explicit definability of the sentence asserting its own unprovability. This turns out to be a rather general phenomenon: Every instance of self-reference describable in the modal logic of the standard proof predicate obeys a similar uniqueness and explicit definability law. The efficient determination of the explicit definitions of formulae satisfying a given instance of self-reference reduces to a simple algebraic problem-that of solving the corresponding fixed-point equation in the modal logic. We survey techniques for the efficient calculation of such fixed-points.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. C. Bernardi, The fixed-point theorem for diagonalizable algebras, Studia Logica 34 (1975), pp. 239–251.

    Google Scholar 

  2. C. Bernardi, On the equational class of diagonalizable algebras, Studia Logica 34 (1975), pp. 322–331.

    Google Scholar 

  3. C. Bernardi, The uniqueness of the fixed-point in every diagonalizable algebra, Studia Logica 35 (1976), pp. 335–343.

    Google Scholar 

  4. C. Bernardi and F. Montagna, Solution of problem 35 of H. Friedman, to appear.

  5. G. Boolos, Friedman's 35th problem has an affirmative solution, Notices AMS 22 (1975), p. A-646.

    Google Scholar 

  6. G. Boolos, On deciding the truth of certain statements involving the notion of consistency, The Journal of Symbolic Logic 41 (1976), pp. 779–781.

    Google Scholar 

  7. D. M. Gabbay, A survey of decidability results for modal, tense and intermediate logics, in: P. Suppes, L. Henkin, A. Joja and G. C. Moisil, eds., Logic, Methodology and Philosophy of Science, IV (North-Holland, Amsterdam), 1973.

    Google Scholar 

  8. D. M. Gabbay, Investigations in Modal and Tense Logics with Applications to Problems in Philosophy and Linguistics (Reidel, Dordrecht), 1976.

    Google Scholar 

  9. K. Gödel, Über formal unentscheidbare Sätze der Principia Mathematica und verwandter Systeme, I, Monatshefte für Mathematik und Physik 38 (1931), pp. 173–198.

    Google Scholar 

  10. K. Gödel, Eine Interpretation des intuitionistischen Aussagenkalküls, Ergenisse eines math. Kolloq. 4 (1931/1932), pp. 39–40.

    Google Scholar 

  11. M. H. Löb, Solution of a problem of Leon Henkin, The Journal of Symbolic Logic 20 (1955), pp. 115–118.

    Google Scholar 

  12. A. Macintyre and H. Simons, Gödel's diagonalization technique and related properties of theories, Colloquium Mathematicum 28 (1973), pp. 165–180.

    Google Scholar 

  13. E. Magari, The diagonalinable algebras, Bolletino della Unione Matematica Italiana 12 (1975), pp. 117–125 (suppl. fasc. 3).

    Google Scholar 

  14. R. Montague, Syntactical treatments of modality, with corollaries on reflexion principles and finite axiomatizability, Acta Philosophica Fennica 16 (1963), pp. 153–167.

    Google Scholar 

  15. G. Sambin, Un estensione del theorema di Löb, Rendiconti del Seminario Matematico dell' Universitá di Padova 52 (1974), pp. 193–199.

    Google Scholar 

  16. G. Sambin, An effective fixed-point theorem in intuitionistic diagonaligable algebras, Studia Logica 35 (1976), pp. 345–361.

    Google Scholar 

  17. H. Simmons, Topological aspects of suitable theories, Proceedings of the Edinburgh Mathematical Society 19 (2) (1974/1975), pp. 383–391.

    Google Scholar 

  18. C. Smorynski, Consistency and related metamathematical properties, Univ. of Amsterdam, Mathematics Institute Technical Report 75-02, (1975).

  19. C. Smorynski, The incompleteness theorems, in: K. J. Barwise, ed., Handbook of Mathematical Logic (North-Holland, Amsterdam), 1977.

    Google Scholar 

  20. C. Smorynski, Beth's theorem and self-referential sentences, in: A. Macintyre, L. Pacholski, and J. Paris, eds., Logic Colloquium'77 (North-Holland, Amsterdam).

  21. R. M. Solovay, Provability interpretations of modal logic, Israel Journal of Mathematics 25 (1976), pp. 287–304.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Smorynski, C. Calculating self-referential statements, I: Explicit calculations. Stud Logica 38, 17–36 (1979). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00493670

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00493670

Keywords

Navigation