Abstract
Perhaps the commonest reasons for the keeping of pets are companionship and as a conduit for affection. Pets are, therefore, being “used” for human ends in much the same way as laboratory or farm animals. So shouldn’t the same arguments apply to the use of pets as to those used in other ways? In accepting the “rights” of farm animals to fully express their natural behavior, one must also accept the “right” of pets to express their intrinsic natural behavior. Dogs kept in houses for most of the day are being kept in an unnatural environment. So are rabbits kept in hutches, and guinea-pigs or birds in cages. These conditions infringe the animals’ telos. Dogs are naturally pack animals, so is a dog in isolation being denied its telos? Other actions more deliberately infringe telos and autonomy. Enforced shampooing – or even exercise; hair-cutting of poodles; putting animals in clothes; and tail-docking. If de-beaking of chickens is considered wrong, then the same must be true for tail-docking of dogs. One should also question the ethics of specialist breeding – especially when that results in physiological disadvantages (boxers with breathing troubles). There would appear to be no advantage to the animals in having such health problems and when these are the direct result of the breeders’ desire for specific cosmetic traits, we should question the ethics of the practice at least as much as when animals are bred for specific agricultural traits.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
S. Aerts D. Lips S. Spencer E. Decuypere J. Tavernier ParticleDe (2006) ArticleTitle“A New Framework for the Assessment of Animal Welfare: Integrating Existing Knowledge from A Practical Ethics Perspective.” Journal for Agricultural and Environmental Ethics 19 IssueID1 67–76
Berdoy, M. (2002), “The Laboratory Rat: A Natural History,” http://www.ratlife.org.
F. W. R. Brambell (1965) Report of the Technical Committee to Enquire into the Welfare of Animals kept under Intensive Livestock Husbandry Systems HMSO London
A. M. Beck A. H. Katcher (1996) Between Pets & People: The Importance of Animal Companionship Purdue University Press West Lafayette, IN
J. P. Broida L. Tingley R. Kimball J. Miele (1993) ArticleTitle“Personality Differences between Pro and Anti Vivisectionists” Society and Animals 1 129–144
T. Hardy (1985) The Mayor of Casterbridge Penguin Classics Edition London
A. M. Hills (1993) ArticleTitle“The Motivational Bases of Attitudes toward Animals” Society & Animals 1 111–128
Jensen, P. (2005), “Domestication and Animal Behaviour,” in From Darwin to Dawkins: The Science and Implications of Animal Sentience, London: Compassion in World Farming.
Littlefair, P. (2005), “Why China is Waking Up to Animal Welfare,” in From Darwin to Dawkins: The Science and Implications of Animal Sentience, London: Compassion in World Farming (Abstract).
H. G. Parker L. V. Kim N. B Sutter S. Carlson T. D. Lorentzen T. B. Malek G. S. Johnson H. B. DeFrance E. A. Ostrander L. Kruglyak (2004) ArticleTitle“Genetic Structure of the Purebred Domestic Dog” Science 304 1160–1164 Occurrence Handle10.1126/science.1097406
Regan, T. (2005), “Do Sentient Beings Have an Inherent Value?” in From Darwin to Dawkins: The Science and Implications of Animal Sentience. London: Compassion in World Farming (Abstract).
J. A. Serpell (1986) In the Company of Animals Cambridge University Press Cambridge
J. Webster (1995) Animal Welfare: A Cool Eye Towards Eden Blackwell Science Oxford
Webster, J. (2005), “Ideals and Realities: What do We Owe to Farm Animals?” in From Darwin to Dawkins: The Science and Implications of Animal Sentience, London: Compassion in World Farming (Abstract).
F. Wemelsfelder (1997) “Investigating the Animals’ Point of View. An Inquiry into a Subject-based Method of Measurement in the Field of Animal Welfare” M. Dol S. Kasanmoetalib S. Lijmbach E. Rivas R. Bos Particlevan den (Eds) Animal Consciousness and Animal Ethics Van Gorcum Assen 73–89
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Spencer, S., Decuypere, E., Aerts, S. et al. History and Ethics of Keeping Pets: Comparison with Farm Animals. J Agric Environ Ethics 19, 17–25 (2006). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10806-005-4379-8
Accepted:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10806-005-4379-8