Skip to main content
Log in

Abstract

This paper uses two recentworks as a springboard for discussing theproper contours of intellectual propertyprotection. Professor Lessig devotes much ofThe Future of Ideas to demonstrating howthe expanding scope of intellectual propertyprotection threatens the Internet as aninnovation commons. Similarly, ProfessorLitman's message in Digital Copyright isthat copyright law is both too complicated andtoo restrictive. Both authors contend that asa result of overprotecting individual rights,creativity is stifled and the vitality of theintellectual commons is in jeopardy. It isdifficult to evaluate the claims and policyprescriptions of these books without someappreciation for the moral foundations ofintellectual property. The utility and labordesert theories remain the two most prominentin the Anglo-American tradition. Afterexploring those theories, we argue for a secureregime of protection based on the Lockeanvision that property rights are justly deservedas a reward for labor that creates value. However, as Locke's famous proviso implies,even a natural property right is not absoluteand must be balanced by regard for the publicdomain. But a natural right cannot besacrificed simply to advance technologicalinnovation or to achieve marginal social andeconomic gains. While we agree with Lessig andLitman that recent legislation goes too far weconclude the essay by attempting to illustratethat some of their policy recommendations errin the opposite direction by underprotectingvalid property rights.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • A&M Records, Inc. v. Napster. 239 F. 3d, 9th Cir., 2001.

  • A&M Records, Inc. v. Napster. 114 F. Supp. 2d, 896, 2000.

  • Aristotle. Nicomachean Ethics, editor, R. McKeon. Random House, New York, 1941.

    Google Scholar 

  • F. Bar and C. Sandvig. Rules from Truth: Post-Convergence Policy for Access. Paper presented at 28th Annual Telecommunications Policy Conference, Arlington, VA, Sept. 23–25, 2000.

  • L. Becker. Deserving to Own Intellectual Property. Chicago-Kent Law Review, 68: 609, 1993.

    Google Scholar 

  • L. Becker. Property Rights: Philosophic Foundations. Routledge & Kegan Paul, 1977.

  • Y. Benkler. From Consumers to Users: Shifting the Deeper Structures of Regulation. Federal Communications Law Journal, 52: 561, 2000.

    Google Scholar 

  • J. Boyle. Shamans, Software, and Spleens: Law and the Construction of the Information Society. Harvard University Press, Cambridge, MA, 1996.

    Google Scholar 

  • D. Burk. Muddy Rules for Cyberspace. Cardozo Law Review, 21: 121, 1999.

    Google Scholar 

  • D. Burk. Proprietary Rights in Hypertext Linkages. Journal of Information Law and Technology, 2: 15, 1998.

    Google Scholar 

  • M. Castells. The Internet Galaxy. Oxford University Press, New York, 2001.

    Google Scholar 

  • J. Child. Moral Foundations of Intellectual Property. In A. Moore, editor, Intellectual Property, pages 57–80. Rowman & Littlefield, Lanham, MD, 1997.

    Google Scholar 

  • G. Cohen. The Pareto Argument for Inequality. Social Philosophy and Policy, 12: 160, 1995.

    Google Scholar 

  • S. Dogan. Infringement Once Removed: The Perils of Hyperlinking to Infringing Content. Iowa Law Review, 87: 829, 2002.

    Google Scholar 

  • F. Easterbrook. Intellectual Property is still Property. Harvard Journal of Law and Public Policy, 13: 110, 1990.

    Google Scholar 

  • J. Ginsburg. Copyright and Control over New Technologies of Dissemination. Columbia Law Review, 101: 613, 2001.

    Google Scholar 

  • P. Goldstein. Copyright's Highway. Hill & Wang, New York, 1994.

    Google Scholar 

  • W. Gordon. A Property Right in Self-Expression: Equality and Individualism in the Natural Law of Intellectual Property. Yale Law Journal, 102: 1533, 1993.

    Google Scholar 

  • W. Gordon and S. Postbrief. On Commodifying Intangibles. Yale Journal of Law and the Humanities, 10: 135, 1998.

    Google Scholar 

  • D. Halbert. Intellectual Property in the Information Age. Quorum Books, Westport, CN, 1999.

    Google Scholar 

  • M. Heidegger. Holzwege. Klostermann, Frankfurt, 1950.

    Google Scholar 

  • J. Hughes. The Philosophy of Intellectual Property. In A. Moore, editor, Intellectual Property, pages 107–177. Rowman & Littlefield, Lanham, MD, 1997.

    Google Scholar 

  • Harper & Row v. Nation Enterprises. 471 US 539, 1985.

  • P. Jaszi. On the Author Effect: Contemporary Copyright and Collective Creativity. Cardozo Arts & Entertainment, 10: 293, 1992.

    Google Scholar 

  • L. Lessig. The Future of Ideas. Random House, New York, 2001.

    Google Scholar 

  • L. Lessig. Code and Other Laws of Cyberspace. Basic Books, New York, 1999a.

    Google Scholar 

  • L. Lessig. The Law of the Horse: What Cyberlaw Might Teach. Harvard Law Review, 113: 281, 1999b.

    Google Scholar 

  • J. Litman. Digital Copyright. Prometheus Books, Amherst, NY, 2001.

    Google Scholar 

  • J. Litman. The Public Domain. Emory Law Journal, 39: 965, 1990.

    Google Scholar 

  • J. Locke. The Second Teatise of Government. Bobbs-Merrill, Indianapolis, 1952.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mazer v. Stein. 347 US 201, 1954.

  • A. Moore, Intellectual Property and Information Control. Transaction Publishers, New Brunswick, NJ, 2001.

    Google Scholar 

  • F. Nietzsche. Götzen-Dämerung. In Werke in Drei Bandën. Band 2. Carl Hanser Verlag, Munchen, 1966.

    Google Scholar 

  • K. Olivecrona. Appropriation in the State of Nature: Locke on the Origin of Property. Journal of the History of Ideas, 35: 211–235, 1974.

    Google Scholar 

  • Plaintiff's Brief, A&M Records, Inc. v. Napster, Inc. 114 F. Supp. 2d, 896, 2000.

  • R. Rotstein. Beyond Metaphor: Copyright Infringement and the Fiction of the Work. Chicago-Kent Law Review, 68: 725, 1992.

    Google Scholar 

  • P. Samuelson. The Copyright Grab. Wired, 4.01: 134, 1996.

  • R. Spinello Regulating Cyberspace: The Policies and Technologies of Control. Quorum Books, Westport, CN, 2002.

    Google Scholar 

  • P. Steidlmeier, The Moral Legitimacy of Intellectual Property Claims: American Business and Developing Country Perspectives. Journal of Business Ethics, February: 157–164, 1993.

  • M. Strasser. A New Paradigm in Intellectual Property Law? The Case Against Open Sources. Stanford Technology Law Review, 4: 200, 2001.

    Google Scholar 

  • S. Vaidhyanathan. Copyrights and Copywrongs: The Rise of Intellectual Property and How It Threatens Creativity. NYU Press, New York, 2001.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wheaton v. Peters. 33 US 591, 1834.

  • A. Yen. Restoring the Natural Law: Copyright as Labor and Possession. Ohio State Law Journal, 51: 517, 1990.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Spinello, R.A. The future of intellectual property. Ethics and Information Technology 5, 1–16 (2003). https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1024976203396

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1024976203396

Navigation