Skip to main content
Log in

Confucianism, Democracy, and the Virtue of Deference

  • Published:
Dao Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Some democratic theorists have argued that contemporary people should practice only a civility that recognizes others as equal persons, and eschew any form of deference to authority as a feudalistic cultural holdover that ought to be abandoned in the modern era. Against such views, this essay engages early Confucian views of ethics and society, including their analyses of different sorts of authority and status, in order to argue that, properly understood, deference is indeed a virtue of considerable importance for contemporary democratic societies and the citizens who constitute them.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Ackerly, Brooke A. 2005. “Is Liberalism the Only Way Toward Democracy? Confucianism and Democracy.” Political Theory 33.4: 547–576.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Angle, Stephen C. 2002. Human Rights and Chinese Thought: A Cross-Cultural Inquiry. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • _____. 2009. Sagehood: The Contemporary Significance of Neo-Confucian Philosophy. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • _____. 2012. Contemporary Confucian Political Philosophy. Malden, MA: Polity Press.

  • Berlin, Isaiah. 1998. The Proper Study of Mankind: An Anthology of Essays. New York: Farrar, Straus and Giroux.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bourdieu, Pierre. 1977. Outline of a Theory of Practice. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Csikszentmihalyi, Mark. 2004. Material Virtue: Ethics and the Body in Early China. Sinica Leidensia, vol. 66. Leiden: Brill.

  • Darwall, Stephen L. 1977. “Two Kinds of Respect.” Ethics 88.1 (Oct.): 36–49.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Estlund, David M. 2008. “Why Not an Epistocracy of the Educated?” In Democratic Authority: A Philosophical Framework, 206–222. Princeton: Princeton University Press.

  • Hahm, Chaihark. 2003. “Constitutionalism, Confucian Civic Virtue, and Ritual Propriety.” In Confucianism for the Modern World, edited by Daniel Bell and Chaibong Hahm, 31–53. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ing, Michael. 2012. The Dysfunction of Ritual in Early Confucianism. New York: Oxford University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Ivanhoe, Philip J. 2007. “Heaven as a Source for Ethical Warrant in Early Confucianism.” Dao: A Journal of Comparative Philosophy 6.3: 211–220.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kupperman, Joel J. 2010. “Confucian Civility.” Dao: A Journal of Comparative Philosophy 9.1: 11–23.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Laborde, Cécile, and John Maynor, eds. 2008. Republicanism and Political Theory. Malden, MA: Blackwell.

  • Lau, D. C., ed. 1995a. A Concordance to the Mengzi. Hong Kong: Chinese University of Hong Kong, Institute of Chinese Studies, Ancient Chinese Text Concordance Series.

  • _____.1995b. A Concordance to the Lunyu. Hong Kong: Chinese University of Hong Kong, Institute of Chinese Studies, Ancient Chinese Text Concordance Series.

  • _____.1996. A Concordance to the Xunzi. Hong Kong: Chinese University of Hong Kong, Institute of Chinese Studies, Ancient Chinese Text Concordance Series.

  • McGrath, Sarah. 2011. “Skepticism about Moral Expertise as a Puzzle for Moral Realism.” Journal of Philosophy 108.3 (March): 111–137.

    Google Scholar 

  • Puett, Michael. 2008. “Human and Divine Kingship in Early China: Comparative Reflections.” In Religion and Power: Divine Kingship in the Ancient World and Beyond, edited by Nicole Brisch, 199–212. Chicago: The Oriental Institute of the University of Chicago.

    Google Scholar 

  • _____. 2010. “The Haunted World of Humanity: Ritual Theory from Early China.” In Rethinking the Human, edited by Michelle J. Molina and Donald K. Swearer, with Susan Lloyd McGarry, 95–111. Cambridge, MA: Center for the Study of World Religions.

  • Rawls, John. 1971. A Theory of Justice. Cambridge, MA: Belknap Press.

  • Rosemont, Henry, Jr. 1991. A Chinese Mirror: Moral Reflections on Political Economy and Society. La Salle, IL: Open Court.

  • _____. 1998. “Human Rights: A Bill of Worries.” In Confucianism and Human Rights, edited by W. Theodore De Bary and Tu Weiming, 54–66. New York: Columbia University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Seligman, Adam, Robert Weller, Michael Puett, and Bennett Simon. 2008. Ritual and Its Consequences: An Essay on the Limits of Sincerity. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

  • Shklar, Judith. 1984. Ordinary Vices. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.

  • Stalnaker, Aaron. 2005. “Comparative Religious Ethics and the Problem of ‘Human Nature.’” Journal of Religious Ethics 33.2: 187–224.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • _____. 2006. Overcoming Our Evil: Human Nature and Spiritual Exercises in Xunzi and Augustine. Washington, DC: Georgetown University Press, 2006.

  • _____. 2010. “Virtue as Mastery in Early Confucianism.” Journal of Religious Ethics 38.3 (September): 404–428.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Stout, Jeffrey. 2004. Democracy and Tradition. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.

  • Tan, Sor-hoon. 2010. “Authoritative Master Kong (Confucius) in an Authoritarian Age.” Dao 9.2 (June): 137-149

  • Van Norden, Bryan. 2007. Virtue Ethics and Consequentialism in Early Chinese Philosophy. New York: Cambridge University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Woodruff, Paul. 2002. Reverence: Renewing a Forgotten Virtue. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Aaron Stalnaker.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Stalnaker, A. Confucianism, Democracy, and the Virtue of Deference. Dao 12, 441–459 (2013). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11712-013-9344-z

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11712-013-9344-z

Keywords

Navigation