Hostname: page-component-8448b6f56d-cfpbc Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-04-25T01:15:06.577Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

A Functional Approach to the Spousal Evidentiary Privileges

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  03 January 2012

Edward Stein
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Most U.S. jurisdictions deem testimony regarding what one spouse tells the other in private inadmissible in most circumstances and most do not allow a person to be compelled to testify against his or her spouse. Although confidential communications and what a spouse knows about the other are both relevant and quite probative, triers of fact do not get to consider them. The scope, character, and very existence of these exceptions to the general principle of admitting everything into evidence have been questioned by legal commentators for centuries, but they remain in force in most U.S. jurisdictions. This paper reviews the justifications for the spousal evidentiary privileges and argues for recasting the spousal evidentiary privileges in functional terms.

Type
Research Article
Information
Episteme , Volume 5 , Issue 3 , October 2008 , pp. 374 - 387
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 2008

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

Bentham, Jeremy. 1827. Rationale of Judicial Evidence. Vol. 5. London: Hunt and Clarke.Google Scholar
Conley, Dalton. 2007. “Spread the Wealth of Spousal Rights.” New York Times. May 20.Google Scholar
Koppelman, Andrew. 2006. Same Sex, Different States: When Same-Sex Marriages Cross State Lines. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.Google Scholar
Krattenmaker, Thomas. 1976. “Interspousal Testimonial Privileges under the Federal Rules of Evidence: A Suggested Approach.” Georgetown Law Journal 64(3): 613–68.Google Scholar
Levinson, Sanford. 1984. “Testimonial Privileges and the Preferences of Friendship.” Duke Law Journal 1984(4): 631–62.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
McCormick, Charles. 1954. Handbook of the Law of Evidence. St. Paul, MN: West Publishing.Google Scholar
Reutlinger, Mark. 1973. “Policy, Privacy, and Prerogatives: A Critical Examination of the Proposed Federal Rules of Evidence as They Affect Marital Privilege.” California Law Review 61(6): 1353–93.Google Scholar
Stein, Edward. Forthcoming. “Spousal Secrets.” In Sarat, A. et al. (eds.), Secrets of Law. Stanford: Stanford University Press.Google Scholar
Wigmore, John Henry. 1923. A Treatise on the Anglo-American System of Evidence in Trials at Common Law. 2nd ed. Boston: Little, Brown.Google Scholar