Hostname: page-component-8448b6f56d-t5pn6 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-04-18T20:30:48.553Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Economic Methodology

Rhetoric or Epistemology?

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  05 December 2008

Steven Rappaport
Steven Rappaport
Affiliation:
De Anza College
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

An abstract is not available for this content so a preview has been provided. Please use the Get access link above for information on how to access this content.
Image of the first page of this content. For PDF version, please use the ‘Save PDF’ preceeding this image.'
Type
Symposium
Information
Economics & Philosophy , Volume 4 , Issue 1 , April 1988 , pp. 110 - 128
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 1988

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

Aristotle, . 1954. Rhetoric. In The Rhetoric and Poetics of Aristotle. Translated by Roberts, W.. New York: The Modern Library.Google Scholar
Austin, J. L. 1965. How to Do Things With Words. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Ayer, A. J. 1968. The Origins of Pragmatism. London: Macmillan.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bernstein, Richard. 1985. Beyond Objectivism and Relativism: Science, Hermeneutics, and Praxis. Philadelphia: University of Pennsylvania Press.Google Scholar
Bonjour, Laurence. 1985. The Structure of Empirical Knowledge. Cambridge, Mass.: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Booth, Wayne. 1974. Modern Dogma and the Rhetoric of Assent. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Friedman, Milton. 1953. “The Methodology of Positive Economics.” In Essays in Positive Economics, pp. 3–43. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Hausman, Daniel. 1980. “How to Do Philosophy of Economics.” In PSA 1980 Vol. 1, edited by Asquith, P. and Giere, R., pp. 353–62. East Lansing, Mich.: Philosophy of Science Association.Google Scholar
Hollis, M. 1985. “The Emperor's Newest Clothes.” Economics and Philosophy 1:128–33.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Klamer, A. 1984. Conversations with Economists. Totowa, N.J.: Rowman and Allanheld.Google Scholar
Laudan, Larry. 1981. Science and Hypothesis. Dordrecht: Reidel.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
McCarthy, Thomas. 1978. The Critical Theory of Jurgen Habermas. Cambridge, Mass.: The MIT Press.Google Scholar
McCloskey, Donald. 1983. “The Rhetoric of Economics.” Journal of Economic Literature 21:481–517.Google Scholar
McCloskey, Donald. 1984. “Reply to Caldwell and Coats.” Journal of Economic Literature 22:579–80.Google Scholar
McCloskey, Donald. 1985. The Rhetoric of Economics. Madison, Wis.: University of Wisconsin Press.Google Scholar
Quine, W. V. 1963. From a Logical Point of View. New York: Harper & Row.Google Scholar
Rosenberg, Alexander. 1987. “Weintraub's Aims: A Brief Rejoinder.” Economics and Philosophy 3:143–44.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rudner, R. 1966. Philosophy of Social Science. Englewood Cliffs, N.J.: Prentice-Hall.Google Scholar