Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Nested Algorithms and ``The Original Imitation Game Test'': A Reply to James Moor

  • Published:
Minds and Machines Aims and scope Submit manuscript

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

References

  • Moor, James H. (2001), 'The Status and Future of the Turing Test', Minds and Machines 11, pp. 77–93.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sterrett, Susan G. (2000), 'Turing's Two Tests for Intelligence', Minds and Machines 10, pp. 541-559.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sterrett, Susan G. (2002, forthcoming) 'Too Many Instincts: Contrasting Philosophical Views on Intelligence in Humans and Non-Humans', JETAI.

  • Turing, A. M. (1950),'Computing Machinery and Intelligence', Mind 59, pp. 443–460.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Department of Philosophy, Duke University, 201C West Duke Building, Durham, NC, 27708, USA

    Susan G. Sterrett

Authors
  1. Susan G. Sterrett
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Sterrett, S.G. Nested Algorithms and ``The Original Imitation Game Test'': A Reply to James Moor. Minds and Machines 12, 131–136 (2002). https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1013741418638

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1013741418638

Keywords

Search

Navigation