Abstract
This paper recognizes that quantum theory is not satisfactorily formulated; in spite of its empirical success, we may wish to consider the possibility to find more intuitively acceptable foundations. It is emphasized that the difference between classical physics and quantum theory lies in the fact that the latter depends in an essential way on classical descriptions of the observations from preparation to recording. In addition, only statistical predictions are possible. We discuss the case of entangled quantum systems. Performing an experiment on one subsystem, we move a realized prediction to be a precondition for subsequent observations. The quantum features presented do not fit into a unified interpretation, they are found to be incompletely defined but pragmatically applied. No uniquely well defined interpretation is adequate for all cases.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Feyerabend, P.: Against Method. Verso, London (1978)
Searle, J.R.: Construction of Social Reality. Penguin, Baltimore (1995)
Wigner, E.: In: Meystre, P., Scully, M.O. (eds.) Quantum Optics, Experimental Gravitation and Measurement Theory, p. 43. Plenum Press, New York (1983)
Zou, X.Y., Wang, L.J., Mandel, L.: Phys. Rev. Lett. 67, 318 (1991)
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Stenholm, S. The Construction of Quantum Reality. Found Phys 42, 86–97 (2012). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10701-010-9519-y
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10701-010-9519-y