Abstract
Applied mathematics often operates by way of shakily rationalizedexpedients that can neither be understood in a deductive-nomological nor in an anti-realist setting.Rather do these complexities, so a recent paper of Mark Wilson argues, indicate some element in ourmathematical descriptions that is alien to the physical world. In this vein the ‘mathematical opportunist’openly seeks or engineers appropriate conditions for mathematics to get hold on a given problem.Honest ‘mathematical optimists’, instead, try to liberalize mathematical ontology so as to include all physicalsolutions. Following John von Neumann, the present paper argues that the axiomatization of a scientifictheory can be performed in a rather opportunistic fashion, such that optimism and opportunism appear as twomodes of a single strategy whose relative weight is determined by the status of the field to beinvestigated. Wilson's promising approach may thus be reformulated so as to avoid precarious talk about a physicalworld that is void of mathematical structure. This also makes the appraisal of the axiomatic method inapplied matthematics less dependent upon foundationalist issues.
Similar content being viewed by others
REFERENCES
Carnap, Rudolf: 1950, ‘Empiricism, Semantics and Ontology’, Revue internationale de philosophie 4, 20–40.
Corry, Leo: 1997, ‘David Hilbert and the Axiomatization of Physics (1894-1905)’, Archive for History of Exact Sciences 51, 83–198.
Gray, Jeremy J.: 2000, The Hilbert Challenge, Oxford University Press, Oxford.
Hilbert, David: 1900, ‘Mathematical Problems’, Bulletin of the American Mathematical Society 8 (1902), 437–479 (reprinted in the new series 37 (2000), 407-436); originally in Nachrichten von der Königl. Ges. d. Wiss. zu Göttingen. Math.-Phys. Klasse 1900, pp. 253-297.
Majer, Ulrich: 2001, ‘Hilbert's Axiomatic Method and the Foundations of Science: Historical Roots of Mathematical Physics in Göttingen (1900-1930)’, in Miklós Rédei and Michael Stöltzner (eds.), John von Neumann and the Foundations of Quantum Physics, Kluwer, Dordrecht, pp. 11–33.
Malament, David B.: 1995, ‘Is Newtonian Cosmology Really Inconsistent?’, Philosophy of Science 62, 489–510.
Rédei, Miklós: 1996, ‘Why von Neumann Did Not Like the Hilbert Space Formalism of Quantum Mechanics (and What he Liked Instead)’, Studies in History and Philosophy of Modern Physics 27, 493–510.
Rédei, Miklós and Michael Stöltzner (eds.): 2001, John von Neumann and the Foundations of Quantum Physics, Kluwer, Dordrecht.
Schlick, Moritz: 1920, ‘Naturphilosophische Betrachtungen über das Kausalprinzip’, Die Naturwissenschaften 8, 461–473.
Sneed, Joseph D.: 1979, The Logical Structure of Mathematical Physics, Reidel, Dordrecht.
Stöltzner, Michael: 2001, ‘How Metaphysical is 'Deepening the Foundations'?-Hahn and Frank on Hilbert's Axiomatic Method’, in Michael Heidelberger and Friedrich Stadler (eds.), History of Philosophy of Science-New Trends and Perspectives, Kluwer, Dordrecht, pp. 245–262.
Stöltzner, Michael: 2002, ‘Bell, Bohm, and von Neumann: Some Philosophical Inequalities Concerning No-go Theorems and the Axiomatic Method’, in Tomasz Placek and Jeremy Butterfield (eds.), Non-locality and Modality, Kluwer, Dordrecht, pp. 37–58.
Thiele, Rüdiger: 1997, ‘Ñber die Variationsrechnung in Hilberts Werken zur Analysis’, NTM 5, 23–42.
von Neumann, Johann: 1932, Mathematische Grundlagen der Quantenmechanik, Julius Springer, Berlin. English translation by Robert T. Beyer, Princeton University Press, Princeton, 1955.
von Neumann, John: 1947, ‘The Mathematician’, in Abraham H. Taub (ed.), Collected Works, Vol. 1, Pergamon Press, Oxford, 1961, pp. 1–9; originally in R. B. Heywood (ed.), The Works of the Mind, University of Chicago Press, Chicago, 1947, pp. 180-196.
von Neumann, John: 1954, ‘The Role of Mathematics in the Sciences and in Society’, Collected Works, Vol. 6, pp. 477–490; originally in Princeton Graduate Alumni, June 1954, pp. 16-29.
von Neumann, John: 1955, ‘Method in the Physical Sciences’, Collected Works, Vol. 6, pp. 491–498; originally in L. Leary (ed.), The Unity of Knowledge, Doubleday, New York, pp. 157-164.
von Neumann, John and Oskar Morgenstern: 1947, Theory of Games and Economic Behavior, 2nd edn, Princeton University Press, Princeton.
Wigner, Eugene P.: 1960, ‘The Unreasonable Effectiveness of Mathematics in the Natural Sciences’, Communications in Pure and Applied Mathematics 13, 1–14.
Wilson, Mark: 1995, ‘There's a Hole and a Bucket, Dear Leibniz’, Midwest Studies in Philosophy 18, 202–241.
Wilson, Mark: 2000a, ‘The Unreasonable Uncooperativeness of Mathematics in the Natural Sciences’, The Monist 83, 296–314.
Wilson, Mark: 2000b, ‘Inference and Correlational Truth’, in André Chapuis and Anil Gupta (eds.), Circularity, Definition and Truth, Indian Council of Philosophical Research, New Delhi, pp. 371–395.
Wilson, Mark: 2000c, ‘On the Mathematics of Spilt Milk’, in Emily Grosholz and Herbert Breger (eds.), The Growth of Mathematical Knowledge, Kluwer, Dordrecht, pp. 143–152.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Stöltzner, M. On Optimism and Opportunism in Applied Mathematics:. Erkenntnis 60, 121–145 (2004). https://doi.org/10.1023/B:ERKE.0000005144.79761.02
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1023/B:ERKE.0000005144.79761.02