Skip to main content
Log in

A metaphysical approach to the mind

  • Published:
Phenomenology and the Cognitive Sciences Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

It is argued that, based on Kant's descriptive metaphysics, one can prescribe the necessary metaphysical underpinnings for the possibility of conscious experience in an artificial system. This project is developed by giving an account of the a priori concepts of the understanding in such a system. A specification and implementation of the nomological conditions for a conscious system allows one to know a priori that any system possessing this structure will be conscious; thus enabling us to avoid possible false-indicators of consciousness like that offered in a behaviouristic analysis. This is an alternative approach to the bottom-up or top-down approaches adopted by, for example CYC (Lenat and Feigenbaum 1992) and COG (Brooks 1994; Brooks and Stein 1993), neither of which, alone, or in some hybrid form, have proved productive.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Aleksander, I. 1996. Impossible Minds. London: Imperial College Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Angle, C. 1989. Genghis, a six-legged autonomous walking robot. S.B. Thesis in Electrical Engineering and Computer Science, MIT.

  • Aristotle. 1963. Categories and On Interpretation, trans. J. L. Ackrill. Oxford: Clarendon Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Aristotle. 1986. De Anima, trans. H. Lawson-Tancred. London: Penguin Classics.

    Google Scholar 

  • BermÚdez, J. L., Marcel, A., and Eilan, N. (eds). 1995. The Body and the Self. Cambridge, MA and London: MIT Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Brook, A. 1994. Kant and the Mind. Cambridge, England: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Brooks, R. A. and Flynn, A. 1989. Fast, cheap and out of control, M. I. T. AI Memo 1182: 11-12.

    Google Scholar 

  • Brooks, R. A. 1991a. Intelligence without representation. Artificial Intelligence 47: 139-169.

    Google Scholar 

  • Brooks, R. A. 1991b. Intelligence without reason. Proceedings of the 12th International Joint Conference on Artificial Intelligence. Morgan Kauffman.

  • Brooks, R. and Stern, L. 1993. Building brains from bodies. Memo 1439, Artificial Intelligence Laboratory. Cambridge, MA: MIT.

    Google Scholar 

  • Brooks, R. 1994. Coherent behavior from many adaptive processes. In: D. Cliff et al. (eds), From Animals to Animats 3. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Campbell, J. 1995. In: J.-L. BermÚdez et al. (eds), The Body Image and Self-Consciousness, pp. 29-42.

  • Clark, A. 1996. Happy couplings: emergence and explanatory interlock. In: M. Boden (ed). The Philosophy of Artificial Life, pp. 262-281. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cliff, D. et al. (eds). 1994. From Animals to Animats 3. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Davis, H. 1989. Theoretical note on the moral development of rats (Rattus norvegicus). Journal of Computational Psychology 103: 88-90.

    Google Scholar 

  • DeGrazia, D. 1996. Taking Animals Seriously: Mental Life and Moral Status. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dobbyn, C. and Stuart, S. (eds). 2002. The self as an embedded agent. Minds and Machines 13 (2): 187-201.

  • Griffin, D. 1984. Animal Thinking. Cambridge, MA and London: Harvard University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Griffin, D. 1994. Animal Minds. Chicago and London: The University of Chicago Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kant, I. 1891. Prolegomena and Metaphysical Foundations of Natural Science, trans. Ernest Belfort Bax. London: George Bell & Sons.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kant, I. 1929. The Critique of Pure Reason A edition 1781 + B edition 1787, trans N. K. Smith. London: Macmillan Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lenat, D. B. and Feigenbaum, E. A. 1991. On the thresholds of knowledge. Artificial Intelligence 47: 185-250.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lenat, D. B. and Guha, R. V. 1990.Building Large Knowledge-Based Systems: Representation and Inference in the CYC Project. Reading, MA: Addison-Wesley.

    Google Scholar 

  • Levy, S. 1992. Artificial Life: The Quest for a New Creation. London: Jonathan Cape.

    Google Scholar 

  • Natsoulas, T. 1978. Consciousness. American Psychologist 33: 906-914.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pilleri, G. 1983. Ingenious tool use by the Canadian beaver (Castor canadensis) in captivity, Investigations on Beavers, Vol. 1, Berne: Brain Anatomy Institute.

    Google Scholar 

  • Strawson, P. F. 1959. Individuals: An Essay in Descriptive Metaphysics. London: Methuen.

    Google Scholar 

  • Strawson, P. F. 1966. The Bounds of Sense. London: Methuen.

    Google Scholar 

  • Stuart, S. 2002. A radical notion of embeddedness: a logically necessary precondition for agency and self-awareness. Journal of Metaphilosophy 33 (1/2): 98-109.

    Google Scholar 

  • Stuart, S. and Dobbyn, C. 2002. A Kantian prescription for artificial conscious experience. Leonardo 35 (4): 407-411.

    Google Scholar 

  • van Gelder, T. J. 1998. The dynamical hypothesis in cognitive science. Behavioral and Brain Sciences 21: 1-14.

    Google Scholar 

  • Waxman, W. 1991. Kant's Model of the Mind: A New Interpretation of Transcendental Idealism. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Stuart, S. A metaphysical approach to the mind. Phenomenology and the Cognitive Sciences 2, 223–237 (2003). https://doi.org/10.1023/B:PHEN.0000004926.05506.ef

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1023/B:PHEN.0000004926.05506.ef

Keywords

Navigation